LA Kings Under

[wolvesguy89]

In the world of sports betting, there are no certainties. There are no 'sure things' but right now taking the Kings under has gotta be one of the safest bets in sports. Its just ridiculous how a team with that much talent struggles so much to score. After watching 2 periods of tonights game, this team just can not find a way to bury. I think them hiring Darryl Sutter is what might be attributing to the low scoring games, he must be implementing a Defense first kind of attitude. At any rate, I hope this stinginess continues, easy money!!

[Rone247]

Showing Wagers 1 - 1 of 1
Ticket Accepted Date Risk To Win Status Wager
109698619-1 2/18/12 9:17pm $750.00 $500.00 Pending 2/18/12 10:05pm NHL Hockey 65 Calgary Flames/Los Angeles Kings Under 5 -150*
Totals: $750.00 $500.00
Showing Wagers 1 - 1 of 1

[Les_Nuts]

No1 rule in Hockey betting:

- Always take LA King games under and LAK TT under, no matter what the juice

[wolvesguy89]

Rone247: nice!!
Les_Nuts: I couldn't agree more haha

[hancocks]

I have two parlays that include the under including CGY ML woopwoop

[wolvesguy89]

Then hopefully this 1-0 game stands my friend!

[wolvesguy89]

Today I parlayed Blues ML with Kings Under. Bet 73, win 100. Literally the easiest $100 I've ever made

[lunchbawks]

Today I parlayed Blues ML with Kings Under. Bet 73, win 100. Literally the easiest $100 I've ever made

nice. if only all nights in hockey were so predictable. this league is CRAZY and you can't forget it.

[wolvesguy89]

Also, besides with Kings Under, betting against the Wild when they are on the road is a great play. If they are playing a legit playoff caliber team, they have no chance. Trust me, I'm from Minnesota, the wild are horseshit on the road. And in general for that matter

[hancocks]

today was super predictable chi win, only thing that kept me on edge was the pen phili game, that game was crazyyy

[Les_Nuts]

Today I parlayed Blues ML with Kings Under. Bet 73, win 100. Literally the easiest $100 I've ever made

I parlayed Blues under and Kings under, little more shaky than yours but usually those are my two 'go to' under teams

[Rone247]

thx wolves

[wolvesguy89]

If you had a Blues/Kings matchup in LA, the O/U would have to be set at 4.5

[lunchbawks]

If you had a Blues/Kings matchup in LA, the O/U would have to be set at 4.5

No chance. no 4.5 in hockey, it's unthinkable

[Les_Nuts]

I think under 4.5 is feasible. In this LAK game today, under 4.5 was around evens so a STL/LAK in LA would probably be around 1.9 for under 4.5 and 1.58 for under 5

[wolvesguy89]

It would take some balls to go Under on a 4.5, I would definitely avoid it. I wish betting NBA over unders was as predictable as NHL

[Les_Nuts]

In LA, I would take Under 4.5 at 1.91 all day. Wouldn't surprise me if STL won 1-0 in shootout with LAK missing every shot in the S/O then Quick finally lets one in

[Les_Nuts]

Out of interest, when was the last O/U 6.0 goals in the NHL? I haven't seen one in a while..

[Meyefull]

I love when LA plays at home I always take the under. Today i took calgary to win. and then took under in that game too. cashed both plays. Woot woot!!

[wolvesguy89]

No idea man, boy I kinda feel bad for Jonathan Quick if he was on the Penguins or red wings he'd have a shit ton of wins this year

[BMaddz]

No chance. no 4.5 in hockey, it's unthinkable

sure you get 4.5 my book had the flames/kings set at 4.5 for a while with the over juiced..was something like -145 over, 125 under