WOW! Boston/Blues Game

[Axis]

Is anyone else watching this!?!?

3 goals in a 1:03 for Boston
St.Louis get one with 2 minutes left
Then scores w/ no time left batting it out of mid air!

*under review right now*

pending score is 4-4

["Sic"]

Yea I saw...This is unlike Boston

[Bluehorseshoe]

I'm watching it. I'm ready to throw up.

That was over the cross bar. Such BS.

["Sic"]

yup it was obvious too..They just dont want to call it

[pocketlint]

If this ends badly for Bruins ....mayhem in the Boston Tube !!

I can see this coming from a mile !!!

["Sic"]

If I could bet live Id take Blues right now

[Bluehorseshoe]

yup it was obvious too..They just dont want to call it

The fact that you can see the puck hitting the stick is evidence from the angle they were showing.

["Sic"]

My guess is shootout win for Blues

["Sic"]

I know ...They played it over and over Im watching it on justin tv

[DennisGreen]

What a gong show game. Unreal swings. Boston with no shots through 18 minutes of the 3rd, down 2-1 which blew my mind in itself. Then STL somehow comes back and scores on their last rush just as the announcer said "It's going to take a miracle here for STL" and sure enough. Anyone who bet the under must have been choked with the last two minutes lol.

["Sic"]

I wonder how many millions the books are gonna make off of this one

[Axis]

It has to be completely over the bar I do believe.

Kinda like the complete puck has to be over the goal line for it to be a goal.

I had Boston -1.5 jerks.

[Bluehorseshoe]

It has to be completely over the bar I do believe.

Kinda like the complete puck has to be over the goal line for it to be a goal.

I had Boston -1.5 jerks.

And it was. Remember the camera angle. It was behind the goal. You wouldn't be able to see it touching the stick if it was below the bar.

You clearly saw the puck hitting the stick.

["Sic"]

Shootout

["Sic"]

LOL Blues will finish this

["Sic"]

Game set match

["Sic"]

wow books must of made MILLIONS

[Axis]

And it was. Remember the camera angle. It was behind the goal. You wouldn't be able to see it touching the stick if it was below the bar.

You clearly saw the puck hitting the stick.

Yes, but not the whole thing, part of it was still hidden by the bar.

What a game. To bad I lost my bet, but wow.

[pocketlint]

Now I know why sports books wont ever need a bailout !! Ever !!

["Sic"]

anyone who laid -330 on the ML deserves to lose

[Axis]

anyone who laid -330 on the ML deserves to lose

Yea, that's a lot to be betting on. Which is why I took the -1.5, though Boston has been rough on the goals lately w/o Kessel.

Welcome to gambling haha.

[pocketlint]

And it was. Remember the camera angle. It was behind the goal. You wouldn't be able to see it touching the stick if it was below the bar.

You clearly saw the puck hitting the stick.

Not to rub salt into any flesh wounds but the rule book says :

High stick (and no goal ):

The stick cleanly makes the impact on the puck and just as cleanly detaches from the puck (as the puck is dispatched toward the net) .

If all of the above events OCCUR and END ABOVE THE BAR then it is no-doubt a HIGH STICK GOAL.

Or else the benefit of the doubt goes to the SCORING TEAM.

Meaning if the stick is still in contact with the puck as it is guided from above the bar to the level of the bar or below it is a legal goal.

Care to comment anyone?

[mmosch19]

such BS that was right above the cross bar which is clearly a high stick. But the Bruins blew it and I lost money complete BS.

[Bluehorseshoe]

Not to rub salt into any flesh wounds but the rule book says :

High stick (and no goal ):

The stick cleanly makes the impact on the puck and just as cleanly detaches from the puck (as the puck is dispatched toward the net) .

If all of the above events OCCUR and END ABOVE THE BAR then it is no-doubt a HIGH STICK GOAL.

Or else the benefit of the doubt goes to the SCORING TEAM.

Meaning if the stick is still in contact with the puck as it is guided from above the bar to the level of the bar or below it is a legal goal.

Care to comment anyone?

The puck wasn't "guided" down from above the bar. It was clearly slapped at above the bar, downward.

[LT Profits]

I turned it off after Bruins got three goals in a minute.

Had Under 5.5 and was feeling good.

[Axis]

I still haven't seen it "clearly" all above the bar. I lost money too, but the puck def. wasn't completely above the bar.

[spurzfan3]

Yep I had a 4 team parlay with 3 cashing and the bruins losing so I lost it....thanks boston...

[BossE]

LOL!!! that game was to rigged

[Axis]

LOL!!! that game was to rigged

Haha, yea they set it up to bat the puck out of the air with no time left on the clock.

Sux whoever put big money on this...