venditto has the over in his 7 teamers. under is a loser for sure.
Comment
mathdotcom
SBR Posting Legend
03-24-08
11689
#4
Do not like this play at all. 4-3 final
Comment
MoneySportsGuy
SBR MVP
12-09-07
4891
#5
math
what sport do you cap?
Comment
Kingctb27
SBR MVP
07-16-08
2258
#6
Originally posted by MoneySportsGuy
math
what sport do you cap?
None. He trolls around here looking for JJ all day.
Comment
Miser
SBR Wise Guy
10-02-08
941
#7
I like the under here. The Stars are tired and the Oilers have been not scoring much lately
Comment
soni
SBR Wise Guy
01-21-08
860
#8
blah, i hate over/under plays. can't you just pick a side?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#9
Nothing wrong with totals. Money is money.
Comment
Ditaln1
SBR Wise Guy
11-26-07
588
#10
Originally posted by LT Profits
Nothing wrong with totals. Money is money.
Amen
Comment
mathdotcom
SBR Posting Legend
03-24-08
11689
#11
Thanks for all the comments guys.
5-2 final.
Any Canadian who just watches hockey occasionally will do better than 99.9% of Americans with an assload of stats in front of them.
Comment
fiveteamer
SBR Posting Legend
04-14-08
10805
#12
LOL, mathy.
Comment
pat venditto
SBR Posting Legend
05-07-07
14347
#13
i had the over once i seen this thread i knew it was a lock.
Comment
HabsAllDaWay
SBR High Roller
11-14-08
146
#14
over got lucky.
stars played the trap all game and 3 goals were scored in the last 2 mins
Comment
pico
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
04-05-07
27321
#15
Originally posted by HabsAllDaWay
over got lucky.
stars played the trap all game and 3 goals were scored in the last 2 mins
yep. that 3 goals pushed my grand salami under 28 goals.
Comment
mathdotcom
SBR Posting Legend
03-24-08
11689
#16
if 3 goals were scored in 1st min and then none the rest of the game, wouldnt you say the under got lucky?
whiners trying to justify their losing bets
Comment
HabsAllDaWay
SBR High Roller
11-14-08
146
#17
good for you math, good for you.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#18
This was a flukey loss though. Score was 3-1 with 1:30 left. Oh well, can't win em all.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#19
Originally posted by mathdotcom
if 3 goals were scored in 1st min and then none the rest of the game, wouldnt you say the under got lucky?
whiners trying to justify their losing bets
Losing on an empty net goal is bad luck. Happens.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#20
Originally posted by pat venditto
i had the over once i seen this thread i knew it was a lock.
LOL
Have you seen my Hockey numbers the last two years here?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#21
Originally posted by mathdotcom
Thanks for all the comments guys.
5-2 final.
Any Canadian who just watches hockey occasionally will do better than 99.9% of Americans with an assload of stats in front of them.
I guess I am part of the .1% that wins then.
Comment
mathdotcom
SBR Posting Legend
03-24-08
11689
#22
Come on, don't consider an empty net goal a 'fluke'. So long as the game isn't tied or totally one-sided, there's going to be a minute where the losing team's net is empty.
Just saying there's no way to say (before or after the fact) whether you made the right bet or not.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#23
Normally I'd agree, but this was 3-1 with 1:30 left, so it took two goals to put the game Over. No worries though, I had a good night overall thanks to NBA of all things.