This may be a reach, but I'd love to hear others thoughts on this.
Underdogs:
Let's say you play on a 'live' dog at plus 3'. At 1/2, they're winning by 3 or less; they may even be losing. The point is that the 'live dog' isn't covering the game spread at 1/2.
Now if the 'live dog' has a better FG % at 1/2, PLAY ON the dog in 2nd 1/2.
Only catch is...what determines a 'live dog?' What if you're on the wrong side to begin with?
I like the idea, but obviously needs more work/paramaters...
What do you guys think?
Underdogs:
Let's say you play on a 'live' dog at plus 3'. At 1/2, they're winning by 3 or less; they may even be losing. The point is that the 'live dog' isn't covering the game spread at 1/2.
Now if the 'live dog' has a better FG % at 1/2, PLAY ON the dog in 2nd 1/2.
Only catch is...what determines a 'live dog?' What if you're on the wrong side to begin with?
I like the idea, but obviously needs more work/paramaters...
What do you guys think?