My best play:
Total FGs under 3.5 -175 (now about 180-190)
The NFL averages 3.1 FGs/game. If all teams were the same, -167 would be a fair line for this. All teams are NOT teh same.
New England has kicked 25 Field Goals in 18 games. This is a few lower than normal. This is caused by 1. New England going for it on 4th down more than most teams - their TD/FG ratio is about 3.5 to 1 (compared to 64/36 for most teams); and 2. New England's "slow the game" approach means most games have only 10-11 possessions per team, instead of 12-13. 3. New England's defense dives up fewer FGs (and TDS) than other teams - just 18 in 18 games.
On another note, the Giants have 29 FGs in 19 games - slightly below the mean.
My numbers suggest that 2.55 is the expected number of FGs, not 3.1. This makes the fair price on the under 3.5 FGs about -300.
Don't go crazy betting it though. It's just one play, and will still lose about 25% of the time.
Total FGs under 3.5 -175 (now about 180-190)
The NFL averages 3.1 FGs/game. If all teams were the same, -167 would be a fair line for this. All teams are NOT teh same.
New England has kicked 25 Field Goals in 18 games. This is a few lower than normal. This is caused by 1. New England going for it on 4th down more than most teams - their TD/FG ratio is about 3.5 to 1 (compared to 64/36 for most teams); and 2. New England's "slow the game" approach means most games have only 10-11 possessions per team, instead of 12-13. 3. New England's defense dives up fewer FGs (and TDS) than other teams - just 18 in 18 games.
On another note, the Giants have 29 FGs in 19 games - slightly below the mean.
My numbers suggest that 2.55 is the expected number of FGs, not 3.1. This makes the fair price on the under 3.5 FGs about -300.
Don't go crazy betting it though. It's just one play, and will still lose about 25% of the time.