Not sure of the terminology but you get what I mean.
A week ago (?) I bet Phoenix Suns +4.5. Odds lengthen to +6.5, I knew I was sitting on a bad bet, and I don't just mean from CLV perspective.
Taking the other side there would've cost maybe 10-12% of a unit but would have been the right move.
I've been in other situations where closer to the game the spread hasn't moved so playing the other side costs the vig but might make me 'feel' happier I stayed away. Obviously this is -ev but better than sitting on a bet you know you shouldn't have made. Whether it's ev to do at all, that is the question.
I don't have access to exchanges so can't use those but i'm sure many of you have had commitment problems to plays after making them and have considered betting the other side to get out.
So do you ever play the other side to exit at a (small) loss?
A week ago (?) I bet Phoenix Suns +4.5. Odds lengthen to +6.5, I knew I was sitting on a bad bet, and I don't just mean from CLV perspective.
Taking the other side there would've cost maybe 10-12% of a unit but would have been the right move.
I've been in other situations where closer to the game the spread hasn't moved so playing the other side costs the vig but might make me 'feel' happier I stayed away. Obviously this is -ev but better than sitting on a bet you know you shouldn't have made. Whether it's ev to do at all, that is the question.
I don't have access to exchanges so can't use those but i'm sure many of you have had commitment problems to plays after making them and have considered betting the other side to get out.
So do you ever play the other side to exit at a (small) loss?