reasoning. Would help.
Both systems work off the same principles except one system allows you to bet more games. I have strict money management criteria. 3% per game...no more than that.
System 1: 57% success rate over 2300 games. The benefit of this system is that on a daily basis I have more money on the line. So financially on a slow day of only 17 games... if one system allows 14 bets and one allows 6 bets... I have 43% of my role on the line vs. 18%. Financially, the upside is greater. In addition, you are spreading the risk over more games, so I believe your downside is also capped.
System 2: 59% over 1300 games. The benefit is obviously the 2%. And I have run the numbers, 2% adds up to a significant amount of money. But that is offset by not having much of your bank role on the line daily. In addition, It is easier to have an off day with 6 bets than with 14.
57% is very strong and I know that. But 59% is really strong and obviously the extra 2% makes a difference. Just could use some opinions.
Ty in advance...
Dave
Both systems work off the same principles except one system allows you to bet more games. I have strict money management criteria. 3% per game...no more than that.
System 1: 57% success rate over 2300 games. The benefit of this system is that on a daily basis I have more money on the line. So financially on a slow day of only 17 games... if one system allows 14 bets and one allows 6 bets... I have 43% of my role on the line vs. 18%. Financially, the upside is greater. In addition, you are spreading the risk over more games, so I believe your downside is also capped.
System 2: 59% over 1300 games. The benefit is obviously the 2%. And I have run the numbers, 2% adds up to a significant amount of money. But that is offset by not having much of your bank role on the line daily. In addition, It is easier to have an off day with 6 bets than with 14.
57% is very strong and I know that. But 59% is really strong and obviously the extra 2% makes a difference. Just could use some opinions.
Ty in advance...
Dave