If you don't bet on Ohio State-4 tonight, you are an idiot!!!

THE PROFIT · 10-16-10, 05:51 PM

I was on the fence but this thread just pushed me. Wisconsin all the way

Mirrapro · 10-16-10, 06:00 PM

Originally posted by THE PROFIT

I was on the fence but this thread just pushed me. Wisconsin all the way

Lmao. I love how people will just bet a team because someone claims the other side is a great play. If you think ohio state or wisconsin will play different just because this guy said ohio state takes then thats ridiculous.

vitalogist · 10-16-10, 06:07 PM

thebestthereis · 10-16-10, 06:15 PM

only locks of the century win, nothing else can win but that as long as you are in the century your game is being played in

aman86 · 10-16-10, 06:22 PM

nice call

newjerseydevils · 10-16-10, 06:27 PM

Originally posted by thebestthereis

only locks of the century win, nothing else can win but that as long as you are in the century your game is being played in

you are right this play is not winning because its merely a lock of the year.

i have ohio st -4 though

feel like such a square

Don Giovanni · 10-16-10, 06:28 PM

Terrell Pryor may be the most inaccurate QB in college football....GL if you bet it

brewcrew2k · 10-16-10, 06:34 PM

Cool, I'm and idiot and probably a winner

DroppinDimes · 10-16-10, 06:42 PM

I'm dumb too, I took Wisc. Oh darn.

ManBearPig · 10-16-10, 06:43 PM

Idiots looking pretty smart right about now

kboiler · 10-16-10, 06:47 PM

You're the one that said the dreaded "lock" word

antifoil · 10-16-10, 06:49 PM

looks good for me. ohio st. gave wisky a 21 point lead. sorry i thought wisky kicked a fg

edit: 24 point lead with exta point pending

mtneer1212 · 10-16-10, 06:50 PM

Well at least we won't have to worry about Ohio State ruining another National Championship

Dan · 10-16-10, 06:55 PM

Originally posted by Mirrapro

Lmao. I love how people will just bet a team because someone claims the other side is a great play. If you think ohio state or wisconsin will play different just because this guy said ohio state takes then thats ridiculous.

You were saying?

goblue12 · 10-16-10, 07:18 PM

Not looking too good at the moment.

SamAceRothstein · 10-16-10, 07:22 PM

OSU backers are awfully quite right now...

nobs · 10-16-10, 07:25 PM

Originally posted by ManBearPig

Idiots looking pretty smart right about now

This is what sucks about SBRforum. Someone posts a play and its down 14-0 so here he comes to rub it in .

Where were you AFTER the game last week manbearpig ?

You know the game that I was right about and you were wrong ?

You know, the Sj St / Nevada game that was going to go over the 60 and Nevada would probably get the 60 by themselves.

They barely covered half the spead and the game went under.

Funny how you never posted again to thnat thread.

Just another poster who only comes back if there is something to rub in ?

nobs · 10-16-10, 07:27 PM

Originally posted by SamAceRothstein

OSU backers are awfully quite right now...

Just like all the haters wouldnt have jack shit to say if he was winning 24-0

SamAceRothstein · 10-16-10, 07:33 PM

Haters? Every one sucks off OSU and for what?? Pryor?? Another running QB that hasn't done jack shit! We've all seen what happens when OSU plays against the SEC. So that being said...Haters hate on.

nobs · 10-16-10, 07:33 PM

Dont worry 2forthemoney,

you may win your next 10 plays and none of these jackasses will say one word about it.

Its so funny how noone said they were on wisconsin until AFTER wisconsin was up 21-0 then every post is " I am on wiscy", " i guess im stupid, I took wiscy"

Lol. Ignore these losers man, they dont ever post plays BEFORE a game, they just go around hating on all losing plays and claiming they were on the winning side whichever side that may be.

I guarantee you that if OSU jumped out 24-0 there wouldnt be one person posting that they were on Wisconsin

ManBearPig · 10-16-10, 07:34 PM

Originally posted by nobs

This is what sucks about sbrforum. Someone posts a play and its down 14-0 so here he comes to rub it in .

Where were you AFTER the game last week manbearpig ?

You know the game that I was right about and you were wrong ?

You know, the Sj St / Nevada game that was going to go over the 60 and Nevada would probably get the 60 by themselves.

They barely covered half the spead and the game went under.

Funny how you never posted again to thnat thread.

Just another poster who only comes back if there is something to rub in ?

What??? What was I supposed to say? I didn't bet that friggin game...I offered my opinion and it didn't pan out...think I give a shit...nope. We won and that's all that matters so end of conversation. I don't have to come back to validate anything so get off your horse. Was I supposed to dig it up and tell you how right you were and pat you on the back? Why would it matter to you anyways...do you really feel like you need that validation? You're making the mistake of assuming I would've been there to tell you were wrong...I wouldn't have because I'm not out to prove jackish so lighten up will ya'?

What exactly am I rubbing in again? I'm making an obvious observation...that's not rubbing anything in. Never claimed to know anything or everything - don't put words in my mouth....moving along.

nobs · 10-16-10, 07:34 PM

Originally posted by SamAceRothstein

Haters? Every one sucks off OSU and for what?? Pryor?? Another running QB that hasn't done jack shit! We've all seen what happens when OSU plays against the SEC. So that being said...Haters hate on.

My point has nothing to do with OSU in particular. Point is he posted a play, he lost.

The only people who never lose are those who dont post plays ( until someone is up 24-0 )

and its amazing how those who dont post play always seem to have the winning side.

SamAceRothstein · 10-16-10, 07:38 PM

Well any one who claims to have a winning play that either didnt play it or come to SBR to lie about picks has a lot bigger problems than being a hater.

Nobs

BrownTown · 10-16-10, 07:38 PM

O-H

nobs · 10-16-10, 07:39 PM

Originally posted by ManBearPig

What??? What was I supposed to say? I didn't bet that friggin game...I offered my opinion and it didn't pan out...think I give a shit...nope. We won and that's all that matters so end of conversation. I don't have to come back to validate anything so get off your horse. Was I supposed to dig it up and tell you how right you were and pat you on the back? Why would it matter to you anyways...do you really feel like you need that validation? You're making the mistake of assuming I would've been there to tell you were wrong...I wouldn't have because I'm not out to prove jackish so lighten up will ya'?

What exactly am I rubbing in again? I'm making an obvious observation...that's not rubbing anything in. Never claimed to know anything or everything - don't put words in my mouth....moving along.

Yes you would have been there to tell me I was wrong, you were here to tell him that he was wrong when you didnt even offer an observation in this game.

So yes you would have came back in if your "observation" turned out to be right instead of being 100% dead wrong. And of course you won the game, that has nothing to do with it, you were a 40 point favand you didnt even score 40. I recall you said they would likely score the 60 by themselves.

I dont need your validation just pointing out this board is full of dicks who dont post plays, only offer "observations" which amazingly turn into plays if they happen to be right.

These dicks dont say shit when we hit 65% of our plays but boy oh boy let somenone post a loser and you all break your neck to rub it in.

and yes using this

is rubbing it in

you ever lose a play ?

you want someone to come laugh in your face

I call that a dick move

Now I have to go

Sportsnut1968 · 10-16-10, 07:42 PM

Alot of experts in here...I missed their predictions....Oh that's right, they didn't make any

ManBearPig · 10-16-10, 07:49 PM

Originally posted by nobs

Yes you would have been there to tell me I was wrong, you were here to tell him that he was wrong when you didnt even offer an observation in this game.

So yes you would have came back in if your "observation" turned out to be right instead of being 100% dead wrong. And of course you won the game, that has nothing to do with it, you were a 40 point favand you didnt even score 40. I recall you said they would likely score the 60 by themselves.

I dont need your validation just pointing out this board is full of dicks who dont post plays, only offer "observations" which amazingly turn into plays if they happen to be right.

These dicks dont say shit when we hit 65% of our plays but boy oh boy let somenone post a loser and you all break your neck to rub it in.

and yes using this

is rubbing it in

you ever lose a play ?

you want someone to come laugh in your face

I call that a dick move

Now I have to go

Ummmm...ok.

Unless you can tell the future then you have no idea what I would or wouldn't have said. You don't know me, I don't know you so why would you assume that this is how I am based on a stupid MB post? You're aware that a lot more asinine things are said daily...maybe you should go play public defender to them too. Do I lose all the friggin time...of course!!! More than I win...I don't claim I'm a champion because I'm not, I just have fun. You have your interpretation and I have mine and I'll leave it at that.

In addition I didn't post to be a dick I posted because when you start out a topic saying "Your and Idiot..." it was a tongue in cheek comment and since there is no sarcasm font...everyone reads things differently. I didn't bet this game and have no opinion so I'm not claiming I'm on the winning side and rubbing it in because I don't care.

I feel like I'm explaining myself to the message board police and it's a little ridiculous so I'm going to get a beer now...cheers

For what it's worth...I think you made a fairly accurate prediction based on stats and numbers, I made mine on peer fandom and emotion...so are you really surprised that you were right and I was wrong?

Like tonight I think NV doesn't cover and the game is under...that's my opinion as a fan. Are you going to call me out on that later too when I'm wrong?

JC357 · 10-16-10, 08:08 PM

Ouch, it isn't looking good at all, well better luck in the 2nd half.

MadTiger · 10-16-10, 08:15 PM

Sanzenbacher is an athletic Steve Largent.

Score, and it's back to being a game!!!

ManBearPig · 10-16-10, 08:16 PM

I don't know if you guys are watching but the end of the Kent/SC game was insane!!!

MadTiger · 10-16-10, 08:25 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDGzi-TzoQs

Godsmack · 10-16-10, 08:47 PM

Originally posted by 2ForTheMoney

This has got to be the lock of the year!!!

how is this working out for you?

nobs · 10-18-10, 07:24 PM

Originally posted by Sportsnut1968

Alot of experts in here...I missed their predictions....Oh that's right, they didn't make any

Exactly. Board full of jackass haters who dont decide which side they are on until someone is up 24-0. Who gives a fuk what side you claim to have when the score is 24-0 ?

Dutch · 10-18-10, 08:09 PM

Originally posted by nobs

Dont worry 2forthemoney,

you may win your next 10 plays and none of these jackasses will say one word about it.

Its so funny how noone said they were on wisconsin until AFTER wisconsin was up 21-0 then every post is " I am on wiscy", " i guess im stupid, I took wiscy"

Lol. Ignore these losers man, they dont ever post plays BEFORE a game, they just go around hating on all losing plays and claiming they were on the winning side whichever side that may be.

I guarantee you that if OSU jumped out 24-0 there wouldnt be one person posting that they were on Wisconsin

When you're done making this kid feel better, make sure to explain to him that if he throws around words like 'idiot' and 'lock' people will bust his balls. Then explain to him that his thread was completely useless. He gave no opinion as to how the teams match up, recent trends, nothing.

Sooo many "empty" threads here.