ZcodeSystem.com winning picks for MLB

[chound]

[QUOTE=zcodesystem;14831726]Like I said I will keep posting. Mysterious system C is still under initial evaluation. It's a new system that I have not released yet. Other 3 were tracked. System A is also anti-public, it's a 5star pickstoemail clients picks.


If similar system made this much where is it now?

The goal to hit the bet at least once in the next 3 games based on statistics that is on our favour. Last season similar system made over $12,000 profit with $100 unit size.

THESE are all quotes from you...............

[chound]

And don't forget about the LAD loss last night.............with the Tex win, SF total push and LAD over loss..............1-2-1.

Do you have a money management strategy posted because if you plan on 4-5 more losing days before things turn around a new client could be in the hole close to a 100 units if he signed when you started your current losing streak? and most most gamblers 1% is 1 unit meaning you busted a few players or are close to it.

[KingJD31]

I have seen it all guy creates a ghost lol, also look up zcode system on YouTube most of there videos has more likes than views, scam 101

[zcodesystem]

3* - [904] Pittsburgh Pirates +112 vs Cincinnati Reds
3* - [915] Kansas City Royals +141 vs Cleveland Indians
3* - [922] Boston Red Sox +150 vs Detroit Tigers
3* - [906] Atlanta Braves +1.5 -175 vs St. Louis Cardinals
3* - [924] Texas Rangers -1.5 +120 vs Seattle Mariners
3* - [926] Minnesota Twins -102 vs Oakland Athletics
3* - [706] San Antonio Spurs -4.5 -108 vs Oklahoma City Thunder
3* - [927] New York Yankees +121 vs Los Angeles Angels
3* - [911] Milwaukee Brewers +118 vs Los Angeles Dodgers
3* - [913] Arizona Diamondbacks +110 vs San Francisco Giants

[zcodesystem]

Progressions are continued according to the plan, taking standard total - 1 run

[Dara27]

3* - [904] Pittsburgh Pirates +112 vs Cincinnati Reds
3* - [915] Kansas City Royals +141 vs Cleveland Indians
3* - [922] Boston Red Sox +150 vs Detroit Tigers
3* - [906] Atlanta Braves +1.5 -175 vs St. Louis Cardinals
3* - [924] Texas Rangers -1.5 +120 vs Seattle Mariners
3* - [926] Minnesota Twins -102 vs Oakland Athletics
3* - [706] San Antonio Spurs -4.5 -108 vs Oklahoma City Thunder
3* - [927] New York Yankees +121 vs Los Angeles Angels
3* - [911] Milwaukee Brewers +118 vs Los Angeles Dodgers
3* - [913] Arizona Diamondbacks +110 vs San Francisco Giants

Are you taking these picks, because your system is saying so? Because except for Rangers and Yankees, it seems it's going against your MLB system. I don't understand.

[billysink]

Google StevethecatCooper Zcodesystems and then StevetheCatCooper FAPturbo scam to find out more about this genius.

Same DNS lookup, same server, same outfit.

Please be aware that anything paid for at Clickbank does have a 60 day moneyback guarantee, so if you did purchase and feel you got scammed you know what to do.

[Dara27]

Google StevethecatCooper Zcodesystems and then StevetheCatCooper FAPturbo scam to find out more about this genius.

Same DNS lookup, same server, same outfit.

Please be aware that anything paid for at Clickbank does have a 60 day moneyback guarantee, so if you did purchase and feel you got scammed you know what to do.

Thanks man. I joined them before reading this thread. After a week, I am mainly a loser with their "winning picks". Don't want to be part of this and especially billed monthly over 200$.

[boondoggle]

3* - [904] Pittsburgh Pirates +112 vs Cincinnati Red
3* - [915] Kansas City Royals +141 vs Cleveland Indians
3* - [922] Boston Red Sox +150 vs Detroit Tigers
3* - [906] Atlanta Braves +1.5 -175 vs St. Louis Cardinals
3* - [924] Texas Rangers -1.5 +120 vs Seattle Mariners
3* - [926] Minnesota Twins -102 vs Oakland Athletics
3* - [706] San Antonio Spurs -4.5 -108 vs Oklahoma City Thunder
3* - [927] New York Yankees +121 vs Los Angeles Angels
3* - [911] Milwaukee Brewers +118 vs Los Angeles Dodgers
3* - [913] Arizona Diamondbacks +110 vs San Francisco Giants

My quick calcs show this set of picks won nicely tonight.

[zcodesystem]

When Rangers lose 10-3 it's clear anti-capper system is back in business. It stopped the free-fall and now might revert back. Lets see. Current record is not very good but it still in profit:
89 - 98, +$3,597

[zcodesystem]

Google StevethecatCooper Zcodesystems and then StevetheCatCooper FAPturbo scam to find out more about this genius.

You can read about our products here: http://sellslikecandy.com/

[Ez Money 77]

When Rangers lose 10-3 it's clear anti-capper system is back in business. It stopped the free-fall and now might revert back. Lets see. Current record is not very good but it still in profit:
89 - 98, +$3,597

Why do u keep insisting to put some false record and winning amount here? Seriously u scamming rooster sucker. Post the plus/minus for the POSTED plays on SBR. How do u not understand this? If u are as good as u think those plays will end up being in the plus right? RIGHT?

[zcodesystem]

Why do u keep insisting to put some false record and winning amount here? Seriously u scamming rooster sucker. Post the plus/minus for the POSTED plays on SBR. How do u not understand this? If u are as good as u think those plays will end up being in the plus right? RIGHT?

I already explained several times that our plays are tracked on independent monitoring Line.com and every moderator can verify them. Thank you.

[EC4THREE10]

Cool your 98-2 roi 1,000,000.95

[zcodesystem]

We are working on a trial-access where you can "look-in" and see what's inside and how it works, different systems we have and expert picks. Should be ready in a few days!

[EC4THREE10]

Your avatar on here has scam written all over it!

[zcodesystem]

System C

1. 5/30/2012 10:10 PM MLB Baseball 964 Los Angeles Dodgers* -160 1.625 vs Milwaukee Brewers
   Y Gallardo - R Listed C Kershaw - L Listed
2. 5/30/2012 10:10 PM MLB Baseball 963 Milwaukee Brewers/Los Angeles Dodgers* Over 5 -180 1.556
   Y Gallardo - R Listed C Kershaw - L Listed
3. 5/30/2012 10:15 PM MLB Baseball 965 Arizona Diamondbacks/San Francisco Giants* Over 5½ -175 1.571
   I Kennedy - R Listed T Lincecum - R Listed

[Ez Money 77]

OK I understand that your are being monitored on that site but what I don't understand why not just post your sbr results? LoL makes zero sense to have people go ask a sites mod to verify your record if that's what they want to do. You are such a fraud.

[zcodesystem]

Thank you EzMoney for your input. I appreciate it. Our system was not created on the day I started posting it. I am posting the results that are tracked on line.com since the beginning. This is the only way to see the big picture especially on a losing week.

[zcodesystem]

The advantage of betting underdogs is that we always lose only 1 unit but we gain more than 1 unit. That's why after the whole bad week the system is still in profit. Let's see if the bad cycle is over.

[zcodesystem]

The longer we look the better. If the system is winning in a long run, sooner or later it will bounce back:

[Ez Money 77]

The bigger picture? With the number of games u post that was like an entire week or two before this thread started. Like u HAD to include those games? LOL

[GUMMO77]

System C

1. 5/30/2012 10:10 PM MLB Baseball 964 Los Angeles Dodgers* -160 1.625 vs Milwaukee Brewers
   Y Gallardo - R Listed C Kershaw - L Listed
2. 5/30/2012 10:10 PM MLB Baseball 963 Milwaukee Brewers/Los Angeles Dodgers* Over 5 -180 1.556
   Y Gallardo - R Listed C Kershaw - L Listed
3. 5/30/2012 10:15 PM MLB Baseball 965 Arizona Diamondbacks/San Francisco Giants* Over 5½ -175 1.571
   I Kennedy - R Listed T Lincecum - R Listed

What happened to system D?

[chound]

What happened to system D?

Ever heard of the TITANTIC?

[GUMMO77]

Ever heard of the TITANTIC?

[zcodesystem]

3* - [969] Chicago White Sox +125 vs Tampa Bay Rays
3* - [972] Minnesota Twins -115 vs Oakland Athletics
3* - [951] San Diego Padres +124 vs Chicago Cub

[Ghenghis Kahn]

i don't want to bump this thread and give you exposure but i've always wanted to ask touts this question. if you are that good why do you have to sell your picks? not being an asshole, i've always wondered...

[billysink]

Google StevethecatCooper Zcodesystems and then StevetheCatCooper FAPturbo scam to find out more about this genius.Same DNS lookup, same server, same outfit.Please be aware that anything paid for at Clickbank does have a 60 day moneyback guarantee, so if you did purchase and feel you got scammed you know what to do.

[billysink]

SCAM ALERT

PLEASE GOOGLE CLICKBANK SCAMS

ie,

"Re: Affiliate Clickbank Scams

---

I know I was on the phone yesterday with Clickbank. I found Clickbank to be very professional and quick to give refunds. What I found disturbing was in some of the video's it was mentioned that marketers have found a glitch in the Clickbank system. I purchased one item for $97.00. Not being familiar with Clickbank I paid through Paypal as a safeguard. When I looked at my Paypal account my account was charged as follows:

$197.00
$97.00
$47.00
$37.00
$18.25

by this vendor. Clickbank refunded all but the $18.25 as it was deemed an underlying charge to the $37.00. Paypal can not refund the $18.25 as the vendor will not respond.

I asked the Clickbank representative if this was the glitch video's referencing in connection with Clickbank. She said, yes, some vendors have found a way to divert your purchase button over to other sites without your knowledge and make purchases without your consent. In the above citing it was an additional $299.25 plus the fees attached to the purchases. Not fun -- but using Paypal as a safeguard I caught it.

I would caution a careful watch on purchases.

[chilidog]

"Re: Affiliate Clickbank Scams

---

I know I was on the phone yesterday with Clickbank. I found Clickbank to be very professional and quick to give refunds. What I found disturbing was in some of the video's it was mentioned that marketers have found a glitch in the Clickbank system. I purchased one item for $97.00. Not being familiar with Clickbank I paid through Paypal as a safeguard. When I looked at my Paypal account my account was charged as follows:

$197.00
$97.00
$47.00
$37.00
$18.25

by this vendor. Clickbank refunded all but the $18.25 as it was deemed an underlying charge to the $37.00. Paypal can not refund the $18.25 as the vendor will not respond.

I asked the Clickbank representative if this was the glitch video's referencing in connection with Clickbank. She said, yes, some vendors have found a way to divert your purchase button over to other sites without your knowledge and make purchases without your consent. In the above citing it was an additional $299.25 plus the fees attached to the purchases. Not fun -- but using Paypal as a safeguard I caught it.

I would caution a careful watch on purchases.

As a Clickbank vendor/publisher, I can assure you that this is not possible whatsoever. It is 100% impossible for a vendor to secretly charge anybody anything. We never have access to the customer's billing information, and clickbank has their system setup very securely. If that person was charged additional amounts, it's because they clicked to agree to it, which then takes you back to a clickbank order form, where everything is clearly defined, and you have to agree to have your card charged again. There's no secrecy involved - I call bullshit on that.

[billysink]

Funny thing about this clown is he has some arbitrage software out as well and markets it with the slogan

"We hate gambling"

Same guy. You can't make this shit up.

He has made thousands marketing scambot forex software but in his arbritrage ad he clearly states that forex is a rip off.

Same guy. StevetheCatCooper.

This guy is a fukkin predator.

[cheeese]

Z,

You said you have a herd of squares you poll and then go opposite of to get your antipubic system. How can you be sure that fading these guys will be profitable enough to overcome the vig (especially without lineshopping)? Then even if they were consistantly losing, what evidence do you have that this would continue going forward?

[zcodesystem]

I would appreciate if moderators keep the off topic stuff out of this thread. This thread is devoted to my system and picks, not to discussion of "clickbank scams". There are a lot of scams on any payment processor. You can even scam people offline on the street.

Thank you

Same guy. You can't make this shit up.

Steve is my partner. We have developed several great products in Forex and Betting niche. Calling someone scam hiding by avatars and anonymity is little offensive. I would appreciate if you keep that out as well. You can also come to our office in Austria to tell him that in person.

The fact that we have one of the lowest refund rates even with a full 60 day money back guarantee talks for itself - most people like the service. Of course there are 10-15% that are unhappy and make refund but you can same way find people who don't like iPads.

[billysink]

I would appreciate if moderators keep the off topic stuff out of this thread. This thread is devoted to my system and picks, not to discussion of "clickbank scams". There are a lot of scams on any payment processor. You can even scam people offline on the street.

Thank you





Steve is my partner. We have developed several great products in Forex and Betting niche. Calling someone scam hiding by avatars and anonymity is little offensive. I would appreciate if you keep that out as well. You can also come to our office in Austria to tell him that in person.

The fact that we have one of the lowest refund rates even with a full 60 day money back guarantee talks for itself - most people like the service. Of course there are 10-15% that are unhappy and make refund but you can same way find people who don't like iPads.

No I will not "keep that out". I will continue to warn the forum that you and your partner are very well documented scammers and will continue to post reviews from the web to back that up.

Online predators need to be exposed.

If you have a problem with that you are welcome to come to my house in Detroit and tell me.

[zcodesystem]

You said you have a herd of squares you poll and then go opposite of to get your antipubic system. How can you be sure that fading these guys will be profitable enough to overcome the vig (especially without lineshopping)? Then even if they were consistantly losing, what evidence do you have that this would continue going forward?

This is a good question which I don't have the answer to. You see, we developed Zcode Hot trends to be able to fully automate the system and so we can back test it in the past to make sure it is always profitable long term: http://zcodesystem.com/zcoderesults.php
However with anti-capper system there is no way to go back and backtest their anti-picks so the system is tracked from April. Even with so many losing days it's in a good profit which tells me it's pretty stable and reliable to be winning long term.