I actually am liking the under in this game better than I'm liking either side.
Comment
onlooker
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
36572
#3
The under seems like the logical play here, but watch this thing sore over. Not the best bullpen there with the Giants.
I also like Lincecum, but not enough to bet the Giants. I also don't lay that much wood on any team (Mets -150), so I will pass altogether.
Comment
xxx
SBR MVP
11-28-05
3884
#4
The mets is the play here. When i make a bet i like the team to support their full straight lineup. SF will be without Ray Durham, their #5 batter behind bonds. Last game lincecum pitched, Durham was 1/3 1RS, 2RBI in a 4-2 win. Mets will be without, Green, wee woo, alou is coming out fom DL and andy chavez is amazing replacing injured players for the mets this year.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#5
I actually think GIANTS are the only bettable side here. Only thing holding me back is the HUGE disparity in the bullpens, but i may make very small play anyway on Lincecum at this price. Lincecum may be better than Perez ALREADY, or at the very least they are about equal, which I think makes Mets a lousy play laying -150.
Comment
Crayzee
SBR MVP
10-27-06
4945
#6
heard bonds might be sitting tonite if that matters to anyone
Comment
AC1318
SBR Hall of Famer
10-09-06
6712
#7
Originally posted by LT Profits
I actually think GIANTS are the only bettable side here. Only thing holding me back is the HUGE disparity in the bullpens, but i may make very small play anyway on Lincecum at this price. Lincecum may be better than Perez ALREADY, or at the very least they are about equal, which I think makes Mets a lousy play laying -150.
licecum is great IMO
trust me on this it was the same thing win I said TB would beat detroit yesterday, mets win tonight even with bonds or at least this is my opinion of what will occur.
Comment
cwsulzba
SBR Sharp
03-21-07
431
#8
Why would u ever call that Edwin Jackson would beat Detroit?
Comment
cwsulzba
SBR Sharp
03-21-07
431
#9
Mets RL +155, I am taking that.
Comment
AC1318
SBR Hall of Famer
10-09-06
6712
#10
Originally posted by cwsulzba
Why would u ever call that Edwin Jackson would beat Detroit?
I wasn't counting on edwin jackson to win, he stinks.
I was counting on TB to score as they were and for deroit to not swing so well as they were from the series previous as I stated in another thread. Whats the difference if it wins. TB was scoring a good amount of runs previous 3 games and detroit was struggling to get a couple. I feel that a team who is scoring and winning builds a certain confidence no matter who they are playing and the momentum carrys them I found out the hard way when I was younger that bucking a team on a roll because they are due to win or lose is a stupid move. TB wasn't exactly on a roll but they did score some runs against a stingy sox team.