Why people lose when betting on WTA..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • adam3248
    SBR MVP
    • 11-03-10
    • 1271

    #1
    Why people lose when betting on WTA..
    In depth analysis of why it can be so difficult to predict and make money on the WTA..

    1% = Making a bad betting decision and/or the opponent simply playing better on the day.

    99% = F**king Bullsh*t!
  • Snowball
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 11-15-09
    • 30047

    #2
    it's just because they are women. not complicated.
    Comment
    • pokahplaya
      SBR Rookie
      • 02-11-15
      • 14

      #3
      Originally posted by Snowball
      it's just because they are women. not complicated.
      Disagree, I find women mighty complicated.
      Comment
      • leetreaper
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 10-23-10
        • 34841

        #4
        If you refer to Kerber/Azarenka match there's no surprise there, Kerber is in terrible shape and Azarenka own her 3-0 H2H. Make it 4-0.
        Comment
        • KushMoney
          SBR Wise Guy
          • 07-11-11
          • 658

          #5
          Because they are Women.

          Menstrual Cycles



          One set, the bitch is on top of the world. Can't touch her game!


          Next set, it looks like she is about to feint and wants to cry. Can't hold serve.


          3rd Set, now the OTHER Girl looks like she wants to feint and cry, and NEITHER can hold serve.
          Comment
          • pattymayo
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 05-19-09
            • 10221

            #6
            You guys act like this never happens in men's tennis
            Comment
            • adam3248
              SBR MVP
              • 11-03-10
              • 1271

              #7
              Just happened in the Seppi v Gasquet match to me. Seppi 4-2 up on serve in the 3rd set, loses it 6-4. Tempted to create an identical thread for ATP right now lol.
              Comment
              • pattymayo
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 05-19-09
                • 10221

                #8
                4-2 up is 4-2 up, not on serve. You meant Seppi was serving up 4-2 and blew it
                Comment
                • adam3248
                  SBR MVP
                  • 11-03-10
                  • 1271

                  #9
                  Yes, I meant 4-2 up with Seppi serving. I understand that 'on serve' would suggest that neither player is leading by a 'break' but you knew exactly what I meant, just nit-picking for the sake of it. Thanks for correcting me and clarifying that for everyone though. 👍
                  Comment
                  SBR Contests
                  Collapse
                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                  Collapse
                  Working...