Injured Davydenko to miss Australian Open

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigboydan
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 08-10-05
    • 55420

    #1
    Injured Davydenko to miss Australian Open
    Injured Davydenko to miss Australian Open

    CHENNAI, India (AP)—Nikolay Davydenko will miss the Australian Open because of a heel injury that bothered him last season and has caused “unbearable” pain the past two weeks.

    The fifth-ranked Russian also pulled out of the Chennai Open, where he was seeded first and was to play Lukas Dlouhy of Czech Republic in the second round. All of Wednesday’s matches were rained out.

    “I can’t run and I can’t play,” he said. “I know that I may not return to the court soon.”

    Davydenko said the pain in his left heel flared last week and he’s taken painkillers.

    “The doctors here in Chennai have tried some therapy for a few days, but I now need to fix this before playing any more tournaments,” he said. “It’s obviously serious since I’ll even miss the Australian Open.”

    Davydenko said he thought he could play through the pain last season. He was troubled by the injury at the Masters Cup in November in China, where he lost the final to Novak Djokovic.

    “I need to check my heel and that’s why I’m going home, to see what’s happening and what’s wrong,” he said. “I really don’t know exact nature of my injury and the extent of damage. The pain’s been there for two months, but I thought I could continue playing since it wasn’t too painful. It has become unbearable during the past two weeks.”

    Davydenko said the pain worsened last week at an exhibition in the United Arab Emirates during a match against Andy Roddick and intensified while he was playing Rafael Nadal.

    “Here in Chennai, I just couldn’t do anything when I woke up today after playing my first match yesterday,” he said.

    Davydenko defeated Daniel Koellerer of Austria 6-2, 6-3 Tuesday in the first round.

    The 27-yar-old Russian failed to reach the quarterfinals of any of the four majors in 2008, the first time that’s happened in four years.

    “What’s important,” he said, “is that I have to be fit as there are still three more Grand Slam tournaments left.”
  • wannabet
    SBR Sharp
    • 10-27-08
    • 359

    #2
    Cillic is a good one. Jokovic is the best of the top 4, followed closely by Nadal. Federer will get murdered by Jokovic if they matchup in the semis. Nadal/Jokovic is the ideal final. Murray has no shot in this one at all.
    Comment
    • meganie
      SBR Wise Guy
      • 09-09-08
      • 591

      #3
      Originally posted by wannabet
      Cillic is a good one. Jokovic is the best of the top 4, followed closely by Nadal. Federer will get murdered by Jokovic if they matchup in the semis. Nadal/Jokovic is the ideal final. Murray has no shot in this one at all.
      Right, just like Gulbis was "murdered" by Djokovic?
      Comment
      • wannabet
        SBR Sharp
        • 10-27-08
        • 359

        #4
        Does that mean Djokovic lost to Gulbis recently? I see Gulbis just lost his latest match. If Djokovic lost yesterday, then I would say that would help him even more. He doesn't care about anything but the majors. I promise you he won't go out early. Federer will have no chance against him if they matchup. Fed is on his way out. Nadal will also be tough to beat in this huge and exciting Aussie open coming up. Federer would likely lose to any of Nadal, Djokovic, Murray. Looking forward to his downfall in this tourney.
        Comment
        • meganie
          SBR Wise Guy
          • 09-09-08
          • 591

          #5
          Yeah he lost the first round in Brisbane and he played horrible by his standards.
          He may win against Federer, but I'm pretty sure not as clear as you see it.
          Comment
          • wannabet
            SBR Sharp
            • 10-27-08
            • 359

            #6
            He'll do well coming up. Seems like more than a year ago he was at the top after he won the Australian. You guys are fun to listen to when the tournaments are going on. Federer is on the way out, but I hope you don't have a future on him. I am definitely excited about this tournament!!
            Comment
            • meganie
              SBR Wise Guy
              • 09-09-08
              • 591

              #7
              Nope, I don't play futures anymore since I got burned at the Masters Cup.
              Well, you have your opinion, I have mine, lets see what the Aussies bring. Would be funny, if they don't even play each other. Is it sure at all that Federer would play Djokovic in the semis? I remember several semi finals last year where they played against each other as No.1 and 3 seed.
              Comment
              • wannabet
                SBR Sharp
                • 10-27-08
                • 359

                #8
                You got burned by Djokovic? No wonder you don't like him.lol I don't know if they will play each other in the semis. I don't think Federer is a lock to get there anyway. My top two picks are Nadal and Djokovic. How about women's, I don't think anyone but Serena is a good bet from day 1.
                Comment
                • meganie
                  SBR Wise Guy
                  • 09-09-08
                  • 591

                  #9
                  Originally posted by wannabet
                  You got burned by Djokovic? No wonder you don't like him.lol I don't know if they will play each other in the semis. I don't think Federer is a lock to get there anyway. My top two picks are Nadal and Djokovic. How about women's, I don't think anyone but Serena is a good bet from day 1.
                  Where did I say I don't like him? I like him a lot...as a tennis player. I don't like his personality that much, but that isn't important and I certainly don't make my picks based on sympathy.

                  Nobody is a lock for the semis, not Nadal, not Federer, not Djokovic, not Murray. Nadal for the semis in Roland Garros would come closest to a lock.

                  I just don't see it the way you do, I see four pretty even players on hard court who can beat each other on any given day.

                  Serena is the logical pick though Jankovic, Ivanovic (if she gets her self-esteem back) or Venus should have chances.
                  Comment
                  • wannabet
                    SBR Sharp
                    • 10-27-08
                    • 359

                    #10
                    I know, you have been doing well handicapping tennis. I was watching some of your picks, and you did very well. I am not that knowledgeable, which is why I say I like listening to what you and the other people have to say during the tournaments.I look for players flying under the radar, and Djokovic seems to be doing that, as defending champ and ranked below Murray who has never won a Major tournament. part of it is just predicting who will step up their game at the right time. That's all I am attempting to do, because I don't keep up with all the breaking tennis news. You and eaglesfan got on the +400 Davis Cup thing before Nadal was out. I wouldn't have had any clue about that. I defer to you guys, but I'm syaing I think Djokovic is on a good streak, and he'll want to defend. Some of these guys are into their particular achievements. Djokovic may be saying, well if I defend my Aussie Open title, not many people can say they've done that. He may have extra motivation for this tournament. Federer is past his prime. I don't think anyone is arguing that. I think his best chance this year is Wimbeldon or the US Open. Nadal is a lock at Roland Garros. Now don't disappoint me in two weeks, you guys have been doing really well, so I am expecting some good wagers posted on ths board.
                    Comment
                    • meganie
                      SBR Wise Guy
                      • 09-09-08
                      • 591

                      #11
                      Well, I'm still pretty new to this, my first full year of capping. But I'm quite excited about the Aussies too, should be fun to watch. Wow, just looked up the odds, didn't realize that Murray's odds dropped that much. Last time I checked, he was about +500, behind Nadal on third place and now he's +300.

                      The reason why people think that Murray's chances are higher than Djokovic's is simply based on their recent performances, Murray had an unbelievable second half, beat Nadal, Djokovic and Federer twice, while Djokovic played mostly below his standards.

                      Unfortunately didn't have the time to watch the other three, so I don't know much about their form. But Nadal seems to be in good shape, crushed Santoro and Beck. Lets see how he plays against Monfils.

                      Currently watching Ivanovic vs. Mauresmo, Ana makes some unbelievable errors, just had a veeeeeeeery easy volley, nearly hit a ball kid instead of the court. She still plays like Jekyll and Hyde.
                      Comment
                      • wannabet
                        SBR Sharp
                        • 10-27-08
                        • 359

                        #12
                        Looks like Djokovic is a little bit behind the other 3, you get better odds on him. Would you say he won 2 of the top 5 tournaments last year? One at the beginning of the season, one at the end of the season (is masters next in prize money etc after the grand slams?) Nadal is playing in Doha, is that a city? Isn't that where the women's masters was at the end of last season?
                        Comment
                        • meganie
                          SBR Wise Guy
                          • 09-09-08
                          • 591

                          #13
                          Originally posted by wannabet
                          Looks like Djokovic is a little bit behind the other 3, you get better odds on him. Would you say he won 2 of the top 5 tournaments last year? One at the beginning of the season, one at the end of the season (is masters next in prize money etc after the grand slams?) Nadal is playing in Doha, is that a city? Isn't that where the women's masters was at the end of last season?
                          Capital of Qatar.

                          His victory in the Masters Cup doesn't say much, he didn't get to play one of the other three.
                          Comment
                          • wannabet
                            SBR Sharp
                            • 10-27-08
                            • 359

                            #14
                            Do you have any good tennis sites? That info about their head-head results is pretty good. I was just checking on espn (love their new site) but I can't find anything but Djokovic's loss to Gulbis, doesn't look that bad 4-6,4-6. I'd like to examine some of these results from last year a little more closely before the beginning of the Aussie Open. Then maybe I can go for Murray like everyone else.
                            Comment
                            • meganie
                              SBR Wise Guy
                              • 09-09-08
                              • 591

                              #15
                              tennisinsight.com is pretty good for stats. And I use matchstat.com for player comparison or results. And there's certainly the official ATP site which I also use for looking up stats. And finally coretennis.net for past tournament draws and result overviews.

                              6-4 != 6-4. Not every 6-4 loss means that you played well. Gulbis had way more chances to close out, he just had his melt downs as usual.
                              Comment
                              • wannabet
                                SBR Sharp
                                • 10-27-08
                                • 359

                                #16
                                You have eclipsed my tennis Knowledge. Seems like Gulbis is a journeyman, and I wouldn't have the faintest clue how he plays. No, 6-4 doesn't mean you played well. Djokovic's first match of the year, he doesn't care much about it. He is one of those guys, he will just turn it on in when he wants to. Maybe that's why you don't like his personality. He isn't a work horse like Murray, always scrapping to the end. He turns it on and off.

                                Thank you for the websites. They will come in handy closer to the matches I am concerned with.
                                Comment
                                • HeeeHAWWWW
                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                  • 06-13-08
                                  • 5487

                                  #17
                                  Gulbis is no journeyman, he's an exceptionally talented but as-yet not fully developed 20yr old. A lot of people think he could be the next big thing (not me though, suspect he doesn't have the mental attributes).

                                  As for Djokovic, he's been missing the cutting edge for 6-8 months now. Federer had him easily at the US Open, he lost to Safin at Wimbledon, Murray knocked him out of both Cincinatti and Toronto in straight sets, and he got nowhere in Madrid and Paris. It's not just form either - it looks like he's stopped improving, others have figured out his weaknesses, and he lacks the tactical awareness to change when something is going wrong. Yes, he won the masters cup, but he did so through luck of scheduling - in particular, Davydenko should have had him but utterly choked (as always), and Simon ran out of energy. It's not impossible he could win the Aussie Open, but if he does so it'll be because Murray or Federer have been knocked out by someone else, or are injured.


                                  For the Aussie Open, it's either Federer or Murray for me. Nadal has very little chance - he has a very poor hard court slam record, and has never beaten a top10 player at the Aussie or US Opens. Perhaps Tsonga as a dark horse, you can get +2000 on him.

                                  My money went on Murray a few months back, at +500. If he beats Federer again tomorrow, and he really should on current form, that'll make for a 6-2 head to head record in Murray's favour (and one of the losses was when Murray was 18). Of course they've never met on clay or grass, where Federer would likely win easily, but it's a fair indicator of an obvious truth: Murray is a very, very bad style matchup for Federer.
                                  Last edited by HeeeHAWWWW; 01-08-09, 07:11 PM.
                                  Comment
                                  • wannabet
                                    SBR Sharp
                                    • 10-27-08
                                    • 359

                                    #18
                                    Wow, good job making Djokovic sound like he sucks, and you would only get +500 for him to win. I agree with you that Murray seems to own Federer, but I was surprised that it is 6-2 in his favor. Yes, I remember Murray had a streak where he just walked over everyone. Is that his true form, and will it continue? I think you need a little more time to see if he is already at the top. Maybe he's one of those guys who just can't win the big one. Gulbis has a losing record for his career. That doesn't mean he's terrible I guess, but nothing to write home about.
                                    Comment
                                    • HeeeHAWWWW
                                      SBR Hall of Famer
                                      • 06-13-08
                                      • 5487

                                      #19
                                      Hehe, wasn't intending to say that Djokovic sucks - he's hugely talented, and a rare breed: an aggressive hardcourt baseliner who can transfer it to the clay courts. He reminds me of Lendl in a lot of ways. However, it's pretty clear he's not made much improvement over the last year, and with Murray's advance and all the talented newcomers recently, that's dangerous. It's awfully easily to win a slam young then just stagnate for a bit, and find yourself at 24/25yrs old and your career essentially over. Just ask Jim Courier - in 91-93 he won 4 slams and made 3 more finals (and that against Sampras/Agassi/Becker/Edberg), then just fell away. He never won another slam after 22yrs old. Lose the cutting edge and you're toast - tennis is a vicious world.

                                      Bluntly: I've not seen any sign that Djokovic knows how to change his fortunes, or his effectiveness on court. The Gulbis loss just reinforces that. He looks like a needs a new coach to totally shake things up.


                                      As for Murray, it's a truism that we won't know of he can cross the final hurdle, till he actually does it. However, the improvement has been immense over the last 6 months. The first slam final, back to back hard court masters, beating Federer three times in a row. The first serve has improved, the old inconsistency has gone, and his physical fitness is now immense. Most importantly, he's learning matchplay: when to focus, when pressure comes etc. The only remaining weakness to my mind is the second serve, as so ably demonstrated by Nalbandian in Paris.
                                      Comment
                                      • wannabet
                                        SBR Sharp
                                        • 10-27-08
                                        • 359

                                        #20
                                        Who did you guys have for the Murray/Federer Match tomorrow, or I guess it is today for you.
                                        Comment
                                        SBR Contests
                                        Collapse
                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                        Collapse
                                        Working...