Should posters be forced to submit an SBR complaint before starting a thread?

[taxer]

Seems like alot of non-sense threads get started on a daily , people trying to get their way by threatening books about posting about them.

I am 100% in agreement that these forums are here for some of us that gamble and that have actual money at these sportsbooks and posting websites like these can help people stay informed on industry events in places they are funded at.

But lately I have been seeing some fukin circus threads of people losing in casino asking for moneyback , or people just insulting a good book for no reason these thread can be deceiving and can actually stop people from playing at a good sportsbook because some clown decided to take his sour grapes to the public.

[5mike5]

i agree alot of OPs have pointless complaints, trying to get free plays, ect....especially new OPs that only sign up here to do so

but alot also dont, and just posting a real complaint doesnt always need to have a filed complaint by SBR...

[Mikail]

yeah many threads are being made lately with attacking thread titles which are not justified. However I see your suggestion as an indirect form of censorship which is not a good idea. I like the system we have now whereas if someone makes a thread complaining about a book we ask them to elaborate and based on that decide whether the complaint is valid or not.

[princecharles]

yeah many threads are being made lately with attacking thread titles which are not justified. However I see your suggestion as an indirect form of censorship which is not a good idea. I like the system we have now whereas if someone makes a thread complaining about a book we ask them to elaborate and based on that decide whether the complaint is valid or not.

I agree.
This site is so revered, visited and profitable because they went counterintuitive to a blatant penny wise and dollar foolish mentality of overt revenue protection shielding.