Fair or foul?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HedgeHog
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 09-11-07
    • 10128

    #106
    Originally posted by Justin7
    The line wasn't off 10 points. The fair line was about -8, IMO. that was 6 points off the original market, which I frequently think I see.

    But the real issue is: was it an obvious error? It wasn't to me. It apparently wasn't to the sportsbook, or they would not have moved on action. It wasn't to the market, because the entire market copied it.
    Let's say you're right and you bet -2 on what you say is a true -8 line. It's still so far off that a Book is well w/i its rights to cancel it before gametime. And the fact that other Books copied the error line is not relevant. By no means are you guilty of taking a shot, (I would have done the same) but don't act surprised that some Books canceled it. Just be thankful for any Book that allowed the bet to stand--because it would have been a gift. JMO.
    Comment
    • donjuan
      SBR MVP
      • 08-29-07
      • 3993

      #107
      Originally posted by HedgeHog
      Let's say you're right and you bet -2 on what you say is a true -8 line. It's still so far off that a Book is well w/i its rights to cancel it before gametime. And the fact that other Books copied the error line is not relevant. By no means are you guilty of taking a shot, (I would have done the same) but don't act surprised that some Books canceled it. Just be thankful for any Book that allowed the bet to stand--because it would have been a gift. JMO.
      That would be absurd. It's fairly common for small market openers to be off by that much.
      Comment
      • Frank
        SBR Wise Guy
        • 10-13-07
        • 918

        #108
        Originally posted by Justin7
        The line wasn't off 10 points. The fair line was about -8, IMO. that was 6 points off the original market, which I frequently think I see.

        But the real issue is: was it an obvious error? It wasn't to me. It apparently wasn't to the sportsbook, or they would not have moved on action. It wasn't to the market, because the entire market copied it.
        Completely obvious error for anyone who handicaps the sport.

        An 11-2 team at home vs a 5-7 team and favored by by less than HFA with no significant injuries and nobody resting?

        I could have told you that was a misprint before I was ten just on that tiny bit of info alone. Toss your model to the curb.

        -2 ML in arena is around -120

        -12 ML in arena is around -400 range

        Line closed -11

        280 cents isn't off?

        The barrage all happened in about about a 6 minute span, then the line was corrected everywhere.

        I think what is so frustrating for me is your unwillingness to admit it was a misposted line.

        From everything I have read, you seem extremely fair in your arbitrations, except when it's YOUR money.
        Comment
        • HedgeHog
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 09-11-07
          • 10128

          #109
          Originally posted by donjuan
          That would be absurd. It's fairly common for small market openers to be off by that much.
          So how far off can a "small market" line be off before it's considered an error? What's absurd is that you think a bad line is okay because it doesn't involve the NFL, NBA,NHL, MLB etc....

          A bad line is a bad line. And this error was obvious.
          Comment
          • BigDaddy
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 02-01-06
            • 8378

            #110
            foul

            they need to honor the bets.
            Comment
            • Monte
              SBR MVP
              • 08-21-10
              • 2056

              #111
              They can cancel that prolly...i think what matters in this case is how they do it, e.g. how fast and if they notify per email.

              The funny part however is how much it shows that all the copycats are not bookmakers.
              They should be ashamed for not having a person with at least a slight glimmer of clue putting those copied lines up.
              Comment
              • trixtrix
                Restricted User
                • 04-13-06
                • 1897

                #112
                the real issue here is an issue that nobody at offshore is willing to address: namely, WHAT IS A BAD LINE?

                in vegas, all bets honoured as written (j7 can claim a few exceptions, but that's how it should work)

                at offshores, subjectivity is the main determining factor of claiming whether or not a line is bad. all the people here arguing whether the bad line is "obvious" or not is entirely missing the pt, namely, how can you claim a "bad" line when there is no explicit definition for it?

                imo, book needs to 1.) explicitly define how large the threshold should be before a line can be called a "bad" line (10% move or more in implied win %)
                and 2.) use rest of the market at the time of post as the benchmark for risk-neutral line

                but since currently there is no standard definition of a "bad" line, the book can just void whenever they "opine" they've made a mistake, yet bettors always have to guess and get free-rolled
                Comment
                • sharpcat
                  Restricted User
                  • 12-19-09
                  • 4516

                  #113
                  Originally posted by HedgeHog
                  So how far off can a "small market" line be off before it's considered an error? What's absurd is that you think a bad line is okay because it doesn't involve the NFL, NBA,NHL, MLB etc....

                  A bad line is a bad line. And this error was obvious.
                  This is a great question!!!!

                  What exactly is the difference between a fair line that is slightly off and a bad line? what protective measure do players have against books free rolling them every time their model is less accurate than the market?

                  It is ridiculous that a book can cancel wagers when they make mistakes yet if a player accidentally confirms the wrong side of a wager they are not allowed to cancel it.

                  Most importantly I am appalled that the book who set the line honors the wager but copy cat books are allowed to claim bad line. How is it a bad line if the book who set the line grades it a winner????
                  Comment
                  • HedgeHog
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 09-11-07
                    • 10128

                    #114
                    Justin:

                    Although I disagree with your dispute, you are certainly welcome to fill out an SBR complaint. A link has been provided.

                    Comment
                    • Monte
                      SBR MVP
                      • 08-21-10
                      • 2056

                      #115
                      You are acting as if they canceled a line where it wasn't 100% clear that it is bad.
                      -2 to -10 or whatever...come on, if they notify you fast that they won't honor this bet...that is fully within the rules.
                      Comment
                      • Justin7
                        SBR Hall of Famer
                        • 07-31-06
                        • 8577

                        #116
                        Originally posted by Frank
                        Completely obvious error for anyone who handicaps the sport.

                        An 11-2 team at home vs a 5-7 team and favored by by less than HFA with no significant injuries and nobody resting?

                        I could have told you that was a misprint before I was ten just on that tiny bit of info alone. Toss your model to the curb.

                        -2 ML in arena is around -120

                        -12 ML in arena is around -400 range

                        Line closed -11

                        280 cents isn't off?

                        The barrage all happened in about about a 6 minute span, then the line was corrected everywhere.

                        I think what is so frustrating for me is your unwillingness to admit it was a misposted line.

                        From everything I have read, you seem extremely fair in your arbitrations, except when it's YOUR money.
                        HFA in arena is worth 1 point, not 3...At least it was before the restructuring of the league. I haven't calculated it since then.

                        Line closed 10.5/11. Call it 10.75.

                        If the fair line was 8, I would expect "resistance points" at 11 and 5 (a resistance point being where I would no longer bet on the game).
                        --Edit: 10.5 and 5.5 as resistance points; I would (and did) bet it for one salvo at 11+ or 5-

                        It was a good bet, but there have been many other lines I thought (in Arena and other sports) that were off more.

                        go back to "Obvious error". That is the rule that matters, right? Does it have to be obvious to me, or the sportsbook? Either way, it was not obvious.

                        For the record, Frank, who does Obvious error apply to?
                        Comment
                        • HedgeHog
                          SBR Posting Legend
                          • 09-11-07
                          • 10128

                          #117
                          Let's assume all the given facts in this thread, but a first-time poster is bringing this case to light. Let's further assume that the Book deleting the bet is 5 Dimes. How would SBR, or Justin for that matter, rule?
                          Comment
                          • sharpcat
                            Restricted User
                            • 12-19-09
                            • 4516

                            #118
                            Maybe books software should have a "confirm this line" button and require them to enter a password before they submit their lines
                            Comment
                            • Justin7
                              SBR Hall of Famer
                              • 07-31-06
                              • 8577

                              #119
                              Originally posted by HedgeHog
                              Let's assume all the given facts in this thread, but a first-time poster is bringing this case to light. Let's further assume that the Book deleting the bet is 5 Dimes. How would SBR, or Justin for that matter, rule?
                              The book doesn't matter. I have no qualms with shredding an A+ book, although I typically give them a very fair chance to fix it. In fairness, disputes with A+ books while rare, don't get reported. I think Dozer and the SBR staffers gets a little unsettled when I get involved in disputes with those books. I had a pretty strong disagreement with an A+ book a few weeks ago... I said they owed a player on a voided wager, and they said they didn't even after I explained it to them. They eventually paid the player.

                              As with any contract, you have to focus on the terms. The issue is: "Was it an obvious error?"

                              Reading the rules of most books, "obvious error" is not defined. Everyone knows that if a book puts up +3.5 on an NFL game when the market is -3.5, that is an obvious error. In every single dispute I have ever seen with SBR, the market price is a starting point to determine whether there was an obvious error. What if there is no comparable market, like in props? The legendary Henry chewed me out once for voiding wagers once. I screwed up, and a price was set at pick when the fair price was about -500. But, there was no market. Per Henry, "When there is no market, you can't void bets for a bad line".

                              The market price is the standard for whether there is an obvious error. If you start looking at line movements to determine this, you are suggesting that a weak line put up initially can be voided if there is a big move. There was an NBA game with a 6-point move near the end of last season. Was that bad?

                              I once wrote for the Pinnacle Pulse about bad lines. Let me quote myself... "A general rule of thumb is that a number is bad if it gives you a 7% EV (expected value) versus the market price." (Pinnacle Pulse #25, incorrectly listed as #24 here: http://www.bettorsworld.com/pinnacle-pulse/24.htm )

                              The market has always been used to determine whether a line was bad. I have never seen a sportsbook claim the entire market was retarded, so they should be able to void a bet.
                              Comment
                              • Halifax
                                SBR Wise Guy
                                • 08-10-05
                                • 553

                                #120
                                Originally posted by Justin7
                                The book doesn't matter. I have no qualms with shredding an A+ book, although I typically give them a very fair chance to fix it. In fairness, disputes with A+ books while rare, don't get reported. I think Dozer and the SBR staffers gets a little unsettled when I get involved in disputes with those books. I had a pretty strong disagreement with an A+ book a few weeks ago... I said they owed a player on a voided wager, and they said they didn't even after I explained it to them. They eventually paid the player.

                                As with any contract, you have to focus on the terms. The issue is: "Was it an obvious error?"

                                Reading the rules of most books, "obvious error" is not defined. Everyone knows that if a book puts up +3.5 on an NFL game when the market is -3.5, that is an obvious error. In every single dispute I have ever seen with SBR, the market price is a starting point to determine whether there was an obvious error. What if there is no comparable market, like in props? The legendary Henry chewed me out once for voiding wagers once. I screwed up, and a price was set at pick when the fair price was about -500. But, there was no market. Per Henry, "When there is no market, you can't void bets for a bad line". The market price is the standard for whether there is an obvious error. If you start looking at line movements to determine this, you are suggesting that a weak line put up initially can be voided if there is a big move. There was an NBA game with a 6-point move near the end of last season. Was that bad?

                                I once wrote for the Pinnacle Pulse about bad lines. Let me quote myself... "A general rule of thumb is that a number is bad if it gives you a 7% EV (expected value) versus the market price." (Pinnacle Pulse #25, incorrectly listed as #24 here: http://www.bettorsworld.com/pinnacle-pulse/24.htm )

                                The market has always been used to determine whether a line was bad. I have never seen a sportsbook claim the entire market was retarded, so they should be able to void a bet.
                                I've had two bets cancelled at Pinnacle, presumably for being bad lines.

                                In the first case, Pinnacle was the only book who had a line up for that event. Apparently, in that particular case, "When there is no market, you CAN void bets for a bad line".

                                In the second case, my bet was far less than 7% EV versus the market (more like 2-3%). Nonetheless ... cancelled by Pinnacle. This one still baffles me as to why it was cancelled.
                                Comment
                                • Dark Horse
                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                  • 12-14-05
                                  • 13764

                                  #121
                                  Originally posted by Justin7
                                  The market has always been used to determine whether a line was bad. I have never seen a sportsbook claim the entire market was retarded, so they should be able to void a bet.
                                  Bizar.

                                  Please list how each of the books involved resolve this.
                                  Comment
                                  • increasedodds
                                    SBR Wise Guy
                                    • 01-20-06
                                    • 819

                                    #122
                                    If all the books had the same line up, the bets should stand.

                                    Bad lines are for clerical errors - putting up -20 instead of -2, putting up +5 instead of -5.

                                    Bad lines are not for when a whole bunch of books are clueless and copy one book who screwed up setting a line.

                                    Bullshit not to honor the bets. This is why books have such low limits on sports they dont know
                                    Comment
                                    • Justin7
                                      SBR Hall of Famer
                                      • 07-31-06
                                      • 8577

                                      #123
                                      Originally posted by Halifax
                                      I've had two bets cancelled at Pinnacle, presumably for being bad lines.

                                      In the first case, Pinnacle was the only book who had a line up for that event. Apparently, in that particular case, "When there is no market, you CAN void bets for a bad line".

                                      In the second case, my bet was far less than 7% EV versus the market (more like 2-3%). Nonetheless ... cancelled by Pinnacle. This one still baffles me as to why it was cancelled.
                                      Did you file a complaint?

                                      I wonder if Henry is still running the show. He'd crack some skulls over stuff like this.
                                      Comment
                                      • wrongturn
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 06-06-06
                                        • 2228

                                        #124
                                        Not sure how 7% difference as bad line should be accepted universally. A line -1340 (93.05%) for world not ending in year 2012 is certainly a bad line to me.

                                        The point is there is no need to argue what is a bad line. Everybody has their own definition. The solution though, should at least include a choice for bet to stand, like Pinnacle usually does.
                                        Comment
                                        • BigFish
                                          SBR High Roller
                                          • 11-04-10
                                          • 126

                                          #125
                                          Originally posted by increasedodds
                                          If all the books had the same line up, the bets should stand.

                                          Bad lines are for clerical errors - putting up -20 instead of -2, putting up +5 instead of -5.

                                          Bad lines are not for when a whole bunch of books are clueless and copy one book who screwed up setting a
                                          line.

                                          Bullshit not to honor the bets. This is why
                                          books have such low limits on sports they dont know
                                          This.

                                          And I would add that if books can get away with voiding these bets under the "bad line" doctrine, we are the sliding hopelessly down the slippery slope that
                                          will land us at a place where books can void any wager under a claim of a "bad line."
                                          Comment
                                          • MonkeyF0cker
                                            SBR Posting Legend
                                            • 06-12-07
                                            • 12144

                                            #126
                                            Originally posted by Justin7
                                            The market has always been used to determine whether a line was bad. I have never seen a sportsbook claim the entire market was retarded, so they should be able to void a bet.
                                            Is an opener really "the market?" That's a pretty big stretch.
                                            Comment
                                            • MonkeyF0cker
                                              SBR Posting Legend
                                              • 06-12-07
                                              • 12144

                                              #127
                                              Originally posted by increasedodds
                                              This is why books have such low limits on sports they dont know
                                              Would you rather that they not offer them at all?
                                              Comment
                                              • Frank
                                                SBR Wise Guy
                                                • 10-13-07
                                                • 918

                                                #128
                                                Originally posted by Justin7
                                                HFA in arena is worth 1 point, not 3...At least it was before the restructuring of the league. I haven't calculated it since then.

                                                Line closed 10.5/11. Call it 10.75.

                                                If the fair line was 8, I would expect "resistance points" at 11 and 5 (a resistance point being where I would no longer bet on the game).
                                                --Edit: 10.5 and 5.5 as resistance points; I would (and did) bet it for one salvo at 11+ or 5-

                                                It was a good bet, but there have been many other lines I thought (in Arena and other sports) that were off more.

                                                go back to "Obvious error". That is the rule that matters, right? Does it have to be obvious to me, or the sportsbook? Either way, it was not obvious.

                                                For the record, Frank, who does Obvious error apply to?

                                                If you still using 1 as HFA then your model's numbers are way off in the first place.....good luck to you.

                                                Why do you keep saying -8 was the fair line?

                                                I don't understand where that came from.

                                                This all happened in a 6 minute span where books got hit, moved on a few hits, then realized WTF was going on and took the game off the board.......all of them.......everyone.

                                                Then put the game back up exactly 10 points higher than it was 9 minutes before.

                                                It didn't climb the ladder.

                                                THAT DOESN"T HAPPEN ON OFF LINES.....IT HAPPENS ON BAD LINES

                                                It was "clearly obvious" CRIS meant to put up -12

                                                If you have experience watching how sports markets move, and I think you do, then you know this.

                                                And to the argument that the books moved a few times before realizing, some books auto-move on action and some auto-move to different books. Only when thresholds are met they take a closer look.

                                                Go send Loshak to do an interview with CRIS and ask if they meant to put up -2 or -12
                                                Comment
                                                • donjuan
                                                  SBR MVP
                                                  • 08-29-07
                                                  • 3993

                                                  #129
                                                  Originally posted by HedgeHog
                                                  So how far off can a "small market" line be off before it's considered an error? What's absurd is that you think a bad line is okay because it doesn't involve the NFL, NBA,NHL, MLB etc....

                                                  A bad line is a bad line. And this error was obvious.
                                                  Where have I said it's because it doesn't involve the big 4 NA sports? If you read my posts I actually gave an example from NHL props. You can see from the line moves that linesmakers either have no clue about small market stuff or they just don't care because limits are low. Either way, there are lines that are off by more than this on a semi-regular basis. It's also pretty clearly not an error on the part of the books that copied. They made zero error, they just are too cheap to do their own homework.
                                                  Comment
                                                  • Justin7
                                                    SBR Hall of Famer
                                                    • 07-31-06
                                                    • 8577

                                                    #130
                                                    Originally posted by Frank
                                                    If you still using 1 as HFA then your model's numbers are way off in the first place.....good luck to you.

                                                    Why do you keep saying -8 was the fair line?

                                                    I don't understand where that came from.

                                                    This all happened in a 6 minute span where books got hit, moved on a few hits, then realized WTF was going on and took the game off the board.......all of them.......everyone.

                                                    Then put the game back up exactly 10 points higher than it was 9 minutes before.

                                                    It didn't climb the ladder.

                                                    THAT DOESN"T HAPPEN ON OFF LINES.....IT HAPPENS ON BAD LINES

                                                    It was "clearly obvious" CRIS meant to put up -12

                                                    If you have experience watching how sports markets move, and I think you do, then you know this.

                                                    And to the argument that the books moved a few times before realizing, some books auto-move on action and some auto-move to different books. Only when thresholds are met they take a closer look.

                                                    Go send Loshak to do an interview with CRIS and ask if they meant to put up -2 or -12
                                                    Frank,

                                                    You are not reading. Until you read and respond to what I wrote, discussing this with you will only make the readers dumber. If you want to discuss this intelligently, go back and read what I've posted. I've spelled it out.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • Frank
                                                      SBR Wise Guy
                                                      • 10-13-07
                                                      • 918

                                                      #131
                                                      Originally posted by Justin7
                                                      Frank,

                                                      You are not reading. Until you read and respond to what I wrote, discussing this with you will only make the readers dumber. If you want to discuss this intelligently, go back and read what I've posted. I've spelled it out.
                                                      The obvious error is when the entire market, at the time maybe 40%, took the game OTB when no new information was available, only the realization of a mistake.

                                                      Your late season NBA examples are line hops when new information IS available usually due to rest.

                                                      Whole different ball game.
                                                      Comment
                                                      • Dark Horse
                                                        SBR Posting Legend
                                                        • 12-14-05
                                                        • 13764

                                                        #132
                                                        The only book that could argue that the line was bad is CRIS. None of the followers can argue that. There's a price to pay for following blindly. Very widespread phenomenon. It's not the players problem that these books are too uninformed, or lazy, to set their own lines. And it was not obvious to all that the line was bad, because if it had been that obvious none of these 'knowledgeable' books would have copied it. If these books don't want to get caught with their pants down again, they should rely less on CRIS and hire better linesmakers themselves. As long as they follow another book, they should take the downside with the upside. If it saves them money not to have linesmakers, they should pay the players from the money that has been saved.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • Scooter
                                                          SBR MVP
                                                          • 01-15-07
                                                          • 1159

                                                          #133
                                                          Originally posted by Dark Horse
                                                          The only book that could argue that the line was bad is CRIS. None of the followers can argue that. There's a price to pay for following blindly. Very widespread phenomenon. It's not the players problem that these books are too uninformed, or lazy, to set their own lines. And it was not obvious to all that the line was bad, because if it had been that obvious none of these 'knowledgeable' books would have copied it. If these books don't want to get caught with their pants down again, they should rely less on CRIS and hire better linesmakers themselves. As long as they follow another book, they should take the downside with the upside. If it saves them money not to have linesmakers, they should pay the players from the money that has been saved.
                                                          "If these books don't want to get caught with their pants down again, they should rely less on CRIS and hire better linesmakers themselves."

                                                          But they're not going to hire better linesmakers of their own.
                                                          They'll stop offering small market sports rather than do that.
                                                          Then you'll encounter more BetJM type books, with almost no offerings at all in small markets, and when they do put them up it'll be close to gametime.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • HedgeHog
                                                            SBR Posting Legend
                                                            • 09-11-07
                                                            • 10128

                                                            #134
                                                            If you consider this a moral issue, you may ask "What would Jesus do"? I think of it more as gambling issue, so I'd ask "What would Tony do"? Can you imagine how that live chat would go?:

                                                            Me: May I speak to Tony please?
                                                            Tony :How can I help you?
                                                            Me: Why has my arena bet on Arizona canceled?
                                                            Tony: Obvious bad line.
                                                            Me: Obvious?
                                                            Tony: Very.
                                                            Tony: Correct line is 12 not 2
                                                            Me: Arizona was -2 at all my other Books, so it was not an error.
                                                            Tony: You think 2 is a fair line for an 11-2 team at home?
                                                            Tony: Versus a sub .500 team?
                                                            Tony: You took a shot.
                                                            Me: No I didn't. It's a small market event, so a larger line variance is to be expected.
                                                            Tony: 10 point variance?
                                                            Me: Justin7 and other respected SBR forum members think AZ-2 is a fair bet.
                                                            Tony: I could care less what the forums say.
                                                            Tony: Anything else?
                                                            Me: Yes, you can reinstate my AZ-2 bet.
                                                            Tony: No can do.
                                                            Tony: But I can disable your account if you persist with this nonsense.
                                                            Me: Never mind
                                                            Tony: Good. Take another shot and your account will be closed.
                                                            Tony: Now get off my live chat.
                                                            Comment
                                                            • BET THE HOOK
                                                              SBR MVP
                                                              • 02-16-09
                                                              • 1947

                                                              #135
                                                              I think the books that copied the line should have to honor the wagers they took.
                                                              Comment
                                                              • RickySteve
                                                                Restricted User
                                                                • 01-31-06
                                                                • 3415

                                                                #136
                                                                Originally posted by Justin7
                                                                I once wrote for the Pinnacle Pulse about bad lines. Let me quote myself... "A general rule of thumb is that a number is bad if it gives you a 7% EV (expected value) versus the market price." (Pinnacle Pulse #25, incorrectly listed as #24 here: http://www.bettorsworld.com/pinnacle-pulse/24.htm )
                                                                Wasn't a paper published in the Canadian Journal of Arbitrary Insight, volume XVI, issue 9, showing that the threshold is actually closer to 8.16%?
                                                                Comment
                                                                • Dark Horse
                                                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                                                  • 12-14-05
                                                                  • 13764

                                                                  #137
                                                                  Originally posted by Scooter
                                                                  "If these books don't want to get caught with their pants down again, they should rely less on CRIS and hire better linesmakers themselves."

                                                                  But they're not going to hire better linesmakers of their own.
                                                                  They'll stop offering small market sports rather than do that.
                                                                  Based on this one instance? Nah. They're happy to accept the risk that the CRIS opener is off. What are the odds?

                                                                  If it's profitable for them to offer small markets, they'll keep doing so.

                                                                  It's funny how people who blindly follow the official opinion, instead of forming their own, are so willing not to take responsibility and accept the consequences when that opinion is shown to be wrong. Bleating sheep syndrome. If you want to know which of these books is standup and which is not, see if they blame someone else for their opinion.

                                                                  Of course they could add a rule: if the opening line that we blindly follow is wrong, we are not responsible.
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • betbetter
                                                                    SBR High Roller
                                                                    • 12-30-06
                                                                    • 184

                                                                    #138
                                                                    LVSC and MRG, where the line originates... CRIS does'nt make the line, they just post it first.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • ForgetWallStreet
                                                                      SBR Sharp
                                                                      • 04-27-07
                                                                      • 342

                                                                      #139
                                                                      Originally posted by betbetter
                                                                      LVSC and MRG, where the line originates... CRIS does'nt make the line, they just post it first.
                                                                      If CRIS actually used those guys' lines some of us would be a lot richer.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      • betbetter
                                                                        SBR High Roller
                                                                        • 12-30-06
                                                                        • 184

                                                                        #140
                                                                        gotta know when they do and don't then.
                                                                        Comment
                                                                        SBR Contests
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Working...