I just wonder why most amateur bettors use soft bookies instead of sharp ones. It is very annoying to know that a lot of soft bookmakers have much more users than pinnacle. Customers might spend many years losing as recreational players at soft bookmakers. Then, some of them might turn to professional or semi-professional bettors after getting experiences of those years. At this point, the very good rated soft bookmakers will limit them and the bad rated ones will void their winnings or even simply steal their initial funds. After that, those players will resort to sharp bookies directly or via agents. So, why do a lot of people NOT use the sharp bookies from the very first moment??? (here I am referring to leisure, recreational gamblers, not to arbers).
One consequence of this fact is that sharp bookmakers might avoid minor leagues, avoid early market or lower their stake limits to those who use brokers since there are a lot of good bettors there.
One consequence of this fact is that sharp bookmakers might avoid minor leagues, avoid early market or lower their stake limits to those who use brokers since there are a lot of good bettors there.
