LA Ram player to score first TD

**eaglesfan371** · 02-04-19, 01:16 PM

If it was graded a loss then that means there was a "No TD by LA" option.

**dogman** · 02-04-19, 01:24 PM

That's what I was wondering. I never checked but there could of been one. Thanks for the reply.

**mrpapageorgio** · 02-04-19, 09:33 PM

If my memory is correct, I believe there was a "No TD scored" option when I saw that prop on Bookmaker.

**semibluff** · 02-05-19, 06:50 AM

I would expect Rams player to score 1st TD, 1st Rams player to score a TD, Last Rams player to score a TD, and Rams player to score a TD at any time to all be settled as losers, (even if 'No Rams TD scorer' wasn't listed as an option). Odds quoted reflect the chances of the outcome happening and vary from game to game. For reference 'Rams player to score at anytime' markets late in 2016 were around 170% excluding 'No Rams TD'. This year that figure has been as high as 385% excluding 'No Rams TD' for some games this year. It reflects the possibility of the Rams scoring 5+TDs. No Rams TD for the Super bowl was quoted at +1400 by William Hill and +1325 by 5Dimes.

Coin flip Heads +102 can still be a loser even if Tails isn't quoted.

Edit: Some books listed players who were on IR or who were no longer with the team. EG Malcolm Brown, (Rams). Those bets should of course be refunded.