How Many Sportsbooks You Think Have Segregrated Accounts For Deposits?? Important??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jjgold
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 07-20-05
    • 388189

    #1
    How Many Sportsbooks You Think Have Segregrated Accounts For Deposits?? Important??
    I think some of these big time UK Books have to by law as well as financial trading brokers in the UK, now European books I do not know about, Aussie must have strict regulations also. Asia Boos?? No idea
  • minet123
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 02-17-07
    • 10280

    #2
    Not counting UK or Oz books
    Than ZERO
    Comment
    • Hareeba!
      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
      • 07-01-06
      • 36942

      #3
      The Aussie books are required to by law. One hopes the authorities ensure that happens now, unlike the ACT administered SportsAlive scandal.

      I'm sure the big name UK books including Betfair do.

      Pinnacle and Matchbook say they do.

      I think SBO do too.

      This really is something any rating entity such as SBR should be including in their assessments. No book should ever be rated A unless they do.
      Comment
      • byronbb
        SBR MVP
        • 11-13-08
        • 3067

        #4
        Obviously most books run ponzi schemes, aka fractional reserve banking, payout winners with new deposits.
        Comment
        • Hareeba!
          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
          • 07-01-06
          • 36942

          #5
          Originally posted by byronbb
          Obviously most books run ponzi schemes, aka fractional reserve banking, payout winners with new deposits.
          If you're talking CR, you're most probably correct to a fairly large degree.

          I certainly wouldn't send funds to any such book.
          Comment
          • Cessation
            SBR High Roller
            • 08-23-12
            • 221

            #6
            You'd think the stock exchange listed ones would be required to and that they would get audited to ensure it.

            The smaller books in the uk and aus I wouldn't be trusting the various gaming commissions to oversee shite (see Sports Alive and Canbet).
            Comment
            • Hareeba!
              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
              • 07-01-06
              • 36942

              #7
              Originally posted by Cessation
              You'd think the stock exchange listed ones would be required to and that they would get audited to ensure it.

              The smaller books in the uk and aus I wouldn't be trusting the various gaming commissions to oversee shite (see Sports Alive and Canbet).
              Canbet didn't have a bookie licence in Australia so you can't condemn the Aussie authorities any failure on that one.

              SportsAlive was supposedly administered by the ACT gaming commission.

              Most Aussie books are administered in the NT. I'm confident that they are a lot more on the ball than their ACT counterparts were.
              Comment
              • jjgold
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 07-20-05
                • 388189

                #8
                I doubt man CR books have segregated accounts except a rare few. I thought Canbet back in the day was licensed in AU?? The ownership changes did canbet in.
                Comment
                • Hareeba!
                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                  • 07-01-06
                  • 36942

                  #9
                  Originally posted by jjgold
                  I doubt man CR books have segregated accounts except a rare few. I thought Canbet back in the day was licensed in AU?? The ownership changes did canbet in.
                  Certainly Canbet started life in Australia, in Canberra, hence the name. But after IAS sold it, they moved their licence to the UK.
                  Comment
                  SBR Contests
                  Collapse
                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                  Collapse
                  Working...