...
-
Last edited by naskaerps; 07-04-13, 04:34 PM. -
-
Odds look iffy to me. Shouldn't have been offered at anything more than 1.60Comment -
-
-
7-6 is irrelevent.
You bet, per your OP, at 5-1. That's 6.
So the player was serving for the set at 5-1, and you bet o7.5 at 2.1. Those are the material facts. I don't know the players involved at Challenger level, so can't say whether that was fair or not, the poster above says not.. though 1.6 for the player not to win a service game seems short. 2.1 may well have been reasonable.
Bet365's argument seems to be however that the live feed was delayed, the score was already known, and so you bet too late. Given this was a challenger, that will be pretty hard to prove/disprove..Comment -
-
check betfair history oddsComment -
6 games doesn't matter. As soon as it went 5-2 the bet was won. In fact, as soon as the guy was 0-15 the odds were stale, and 37 seconds is clearly enough for that.Comment -
So you usually bet 500$ on ITF tennis without reason?You just watch blindly at scoreboard and place LIVE bets with huge juice?I dont think so.And what does "nextly to break" means, did that particular game already started?As Santo said, that first game after bet placement was key.
And do you always take screenshots of "in run" bets, and then graded ones again?LOL, you knew this particular bet might be voided.Last edited by filipinho; 07-04-13, 02:07 PM.Comment
