CRUSHER for 10/10

tgunn11 · 10-10-14, 12:50 AM

Here are the rest of his baseball, football and hockey plays for today...

Baseball Crusher
Baltimore Orioles + KC Royals OVER 7

Football Crusher
New Mexico +4 over San Diego St
Washington State +16.5 over Stanford
New Mexico + San Diego State OVER 51.5

Hockey Crusher
Carolina Hurricanes + New York Islanders UNDER 5.5

MisterB · 10-10-14, 12:51 AM

thanks tgunn!

tgunn11 · 10-10-14, 01:23 AM

Here is what I have for Hockey Crusher the past 4 years...

2010 Hockey Crusher
System Record: 99-6
Overall Record: 99-99-5

2011 Hockey Crusher
System Record: 112-6
Overall Record: 112-99-13

2012 Hockey Crusher
System Record: 79-3
Overall Record: 79-55-4

2013 Hockey Crusher
System Record: 116-6
Overall Record: 116-93-3

ohdecas · 10-10-14, 07:57 AM

I am not a fan of paid picks but I can I ask you the difference between "System Record" and "Overall Record"?

edwjim · 10-10-14, 08:37 AM

Thanks Tgunn

BitCoinTalk · 10-10-14, 08:47 AM

Thanks tgunn11!

BitCoinTalk · 10-10-14, 08:57 AM

Originally posted by ohdecas

I am not a fan of paid picks but I can I ask you the difference between "System Record" and "Overall Record"?

The system is a 4 chase system, tgunn11 is being really awesome by keeping track of the wins/losses. So the overall is in this format: wins-loss-push

Playoff_Beard · 10-10-14, 11:26 AM

So just looking at it...

If you double down on all games up to game 4 if you lose, you need to win 18 bets to cover your 4 loses.

Crusher went 116 and 6 last year in hockey.

18x6= 108 wins needed to make up for the losses.

So, crusher was up 8 units at the end of the season?

BitCoinTalk · 10-10-14, 11:44 AM

Playoff_Beard - Yep...

BitCoinTalk · 10-10-14, 11:55 AM

Ever since I found SBR - I've watched every single video from Justin7 and really researching some senior member's here.. One member in particular ChiliDog sticks out. He's been around and is very level headed and wise about his bets.. I've learned a lot by looking at his history... He's gotten me inspired! He's all about methodical betting to make sure you win.. So Crusher get's 50% and ChiliDog has good points on getting much better profits with his own picks.. So I'm going to test it out with Crusher.

I'm going to test two of ChiliDog's wise thoughts he's mentioned from his years of experience... I'm going to apply with small tests what he's observed in his own experience.

#1 Buying Points -
He has found by going back through years of his betting history (it looks like he logs everything he bets on) that by the time the capper has released his play, and you make your bet, if the line has moved, to not buy the points to match the capper, but instead to bet the other side.
I'm not going to try this one yet.. I'm just going to observe it, and apply it maybe starting next week

#2 The Labby Lines - Here is my starting Google excel spreadsheet.

We'll see how this works out with Crusher! Crushers NFL has been stink'n, but surely could improve at any time.

Playoff_Beard · 10-10-14, 12:27 PM

Originally posted by BitCoinTalk

Ever since I found SBR - I've watched every single video from Justin7 and really researching some senior member's here.. One member in particular ChiliDog sticks out. He's been around and is very level headed and wise about his bets.. I've learned a lot by looking at his history... He's gotten me inspired! He's all about methodical betting to make sure you win.. So Crusher get's 50% and ChiliDog has good points on getting much better profits with his own picks.. So I'm going to test it out with Crusher.

I'm going to test two of ChiliDog's wise thoughts he's mentioned from his years of experience... I'm going to apply with small tests what he's observed in his own experience.

#1 Buying Points -
He has found by going back through years of his betting history (it looks like he logs everything he bets on) that by the time the capper has released his play, and you make your bet, if the line has moved, to not buy the points to match the capper, but instead to bet the other side.
I'm not going to try this one yet.. I'm just going to observe it, and apply it maybe starting next week

#2 The Labby Lines - Here is my starting Google excel spreadsheet.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]73755[/ATTACH]

We'll see how this works out with Crusher! Crushers NFL has been stink'n, but surely could improve at any time.

Interesting on the buying points... I'm assuming that is only for a spread and not ML. Let me know how it goes my man, seems like we are on the same page on Crusher. I'm all in on the Isle tonight.

BitCoinTalk · 10-10-14, 01:05 PM

Originally posted by Playoff_Beard

Interesting on the buying points... I'm assuming that is only for a spread and not ML. Let me know how it goes my man, seems like we are on the same page on Crusher. I'm all in on the Isle tonight.

That's correct, it's only for spread's and total I believe, and not the ML.

Sure, and GL!

BitCoinTalk · 10-10-14, 01:40 PM

Early Tip - Tomorrow's Hockey:

Here is Your Hockey Crusher System Play of the Day:Columbus Blue Jackets +101 over New York Rangers

Also here is your 3 extra bonus picks for today: (flat bet these games if you wish for extra profits)

Dallas Stars +104 over Nashville Preds

Colorado Avalanche -125 over Minnesota Wild

Pittsburgh Penguins -130 over Toronto Maple Leafs

newguy · 10-10-14, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by Playoff_Beard

So just looking at it...

If you double down on all games up to game 4 if you lose, you need to win 18 bets to cover your 4 loses.

Crusher went 116 and 6 last year in hockey.

18x6= 108 wins needed to make up for the losses.

So, crusher was up 8 units at the end of the season?

Assumes -110 lines throughout season. On hockey and bases at least you don't get that all the time. Just a heads up on your analysis.

Mucak77 · 10-10-14, 02:46 PM

@Playoff Beard,
You will need more then double down because the of the juice. In MLB he had often plays of -130 or so..
I would say that 116-6 was a losing season? Wasnt on board maybe someone who was can tell..

BitCoinTalk · 10-10-14, 02:51 PM

Originally posted by newguy

Assumes -110 lines throughout season. On hockey and bases at least you don't get that all the time. Just a heads up on your analysis.

Yep... That's correct.. But best case scenario at LEAST 18 wins to make up... Worst case - who knows, just depends on juice...

lifeofriley · 02-26-15, 03:25 AM

Originally posted by Playoff_Beard

So just looking at it...

If you double down on all games up to game 4 if you lose, you need to win 18 bets to cover your 4 loses.

Crusher went 116 and 6 last year in hockey.

18x6= 108 wins needed to make up for the losses.

So, crusher was up 8 units at the end of the season?

No only true if juice is -110 per game.

see thread CRUSHER 2/25 FOR EXPLANATION

lifeofriley · 02-26-15, 03:26 AM

Originally posted by BitCoinTalk

Playoff_Beard - Yep...

no only for -110 lines and that is atypical for hockey
see thread CRUSHER 2/25 FOR EXPLANATION