tint isnt a primary violation
tint isnt a primary violation
In a perfect world nobody has 1 drink and drives but 95% of people that do drink have done that.
Homo thread.
Who gives a fukk reem
Anybody here in Chicago with tint? Sounds like a guaranteed ticket from what I've heard
BigDeem do you have laws in your state? Michigan does... nothing on the driver window or passenger side. You're allowed to have tint on your backseat driver and backseat passenger... but that would look if you didn't have tint on driver side/passenger side windows. So no one really does that. Your hatch or back window can have tint but I don't know what the percentage is? Also, your front windshield can only have 4 inches of tint from the top of the window.
I had a Camaro a long time ago... 35% on the driver side and passenger side windows. I think the 35% looked dark enough... and it looked sharp. I believe 5% on the hatch. State troopers would pull me over all the time. It sucked.
No... Opie,
Let's hear again about your daughter is doing or how you got tickets to the Super Bowl, that's more entertaining.
Hence the 'off topic'
Why would anyone have windows tinted??
The guys that do around here are usually between 18-20, non athletic jerkoffs looking for attention and the guidos
Deener your a guido???
I thought you were a midwestern boy that is educated and driving new age trendy type of car??
very informative thread
deem I agree but it all depends on the state you live in and whats legal. In Mass 35% is what is legal. When they put the tester on it or any tint for that matter it shows up 2.5% less so it would show up as 32.5%. So if you have a 4 door and you have to do 35% all around its not that dark. So if you then do your back window which they cant test at 15 or 20% it makes everything look darker. That's why people do it
I see more people(and by people I mean young kids) pulled over with dark tinted windows than I do anyone else. Window tint seems like a cop magnet to me.