This will be the news that finishes off this obamination!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jbart28
    SBR MVP
    • 04-16-11
    • 3387

    #1
    This will be the news that finishes off this obamination!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    New Emails Reveal That The White House Knew Far More About Benghazi Than They Admit

    STRAIGHT SETS VICTORY FOR ROMNEY NOW. BOOM HEADSHOT EMILY HAINES YOU OBAMA NUTHUGGER.

    OBAMA KNEW WITHIN 2 HOURS AND COULD HAVE SAVED LIVES BY DEPLOYING FAST TEAMS FROM ITALY AND AC-130 GUN SHIPS BUT HE WENT TO SLEEP SO HE COULD CRUISE OFF TO VEGAS FOR A FUNDRAISER.....

    Within at least two and a half hours of the attack that killed our Ambassador and three other Americans at our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, the White House was told that Ansar al-Shariat, an Al Qaeda linked group of militants were taking credit for the attack.
    No more than 2 and half hours after the attack, an email identifying the group claiming responsibility for the terrorist attack was sent to several locations, including The White House Situation Room, where President Obama was being made aware of the details as the tragedy unfolded.
    According to Reuters news agency, the emails specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had taken responsibility for the attacks. In addition to these emails being dispatched by the State Department’s Operations Center the White House Situation Room, they also went to offices in the Pentagon, within the intelligence community, and the FBI,. All on the afternoon of September 11.
    Below you will find copies of the actual missives. The names of the individual recipients of the emails are redacted.
    The first email, contains the subject line of “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack,”. It was sent at 4:05 PM, approximately 25 minutes after the attack began. It describes an assault on the compound by 20 armed people.
    Click on the image for a larger version
    The second email was sent at 4:54 PM and it states that the shooting has stopped and the compound was cleared. It further states that a response team was “onsite attempting to locate COM personnel.”
    Click on the image for a larger version
    The third email, was sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time and had the subject line: “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack.”
    Click on the image for a larger version
    These documents were released from government sources who are reportedly not connected to any U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity. So as is the case with most everything we have been learning about the events leading up to and following the attacks in Benghazi, the facts contained in these documents were not released by the White House. Nevertheless, these facts do contradict just about everything the White House has been saying about what they knew and when they knew it. And it especially points to attempts by the White House to cover-up the fact that this was terrorist attack, a description which both the Obama White House and Obama reelection team refused to admit to out of fear that it would be get in the way of the President’s reelection chances.
    These emails now cast more doubt on the Administration then ever before. They reveal that the White House knew that a terrorist group claimed responsibility for the attack even though they spent more than two weeks claiming that the attack was the result of a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video that was placed online back in July. This now makes it hard for anyone not to be suspicious of what else the White House and the President knew. So far, both the President and Vice President claimed to have not known of two months worth of warnings from Ambassador Chris Stevens about al Qaeda gaining strength in Eastern Libya and of his requests for additional security. If true there is scandal in just the fact that this information never made its way to the Commander-in-Chief. If it is not true, and he did know of those developments, than our Commander-In-Chief is absolutely incompetent and directly responsibly for allowing the events that killed Ambassador Stevens and three others to have gotten as far as they did. But no matter how you look at it, right now there is either one scandal or two. Are we left with a scandal dealing with an intolerable level of incompetence that killed our Americans in Benghazi, or are we left with one scandal regarding incompetence and another scandal regarding an attempt to cover-up the first scandal?
  • Mr KLC
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 12-19-07
    • 31097

    #2
    Haven't seen one word about it on Morning Joe yet. Not surprised.
    Comment
    • dontknowhowtobet
      SBR MVP
      • 01-21-09
      • 2896

      #3
      It's just politics ... it's not a clear-cut argument that Obama did wrong, it's just another story about 2 hours where Obama wasn't in the office anyway. This is not going to determine anything.

      For me the POLLS today will determine the trend, whether it has changed or not ... and so far SurveyUSA giving Obama 3+ in OHIO (2 weeks ago they had him 1+) might be a signal for the trend that has changed.

      We all saw the polls so far for the effect of the 1st debate but this is now gone.

      The 2nd and 3rd debates matter more than this LONG article above (and long means = NOT a clear-cut, people like it short and to the point) ... so the 2nd debate Obama won, the 3rd debate he won it big time ... the polls of this week will be the effect of the 2nd debate ... which is why I can't wait for Florida new polls from 24th of October....
      Comment
      • jbart28
        SBR MVP
        • 04-16-11
        • 3387

        #4
        This is going to have to be covered by the left wing media/ obama superpacs....it is all over twitter, trending like crazy.

        This is doomsday for Obama. Fuk Trump and his nonsense, this is the smoking gun
        Comment
        • Tully Mars 63
          SBR MVP
          • 08-06-11
          • 2750

          #5
          Originally posted by jbart28
          Click on the image for a larger version
          The second email was sent at 4:54 PM and it states that the shooting has stopped and the compound was cleared. It further states that a response team was “onsite attempting to locate COM personnel.”Click on the image for a larger version
          I clicked on it and it clearly say's "Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four other COM personnel are in the compound safe haven."



          This one says "the firing has stopped and the compound has been cleared."
          Comment
          • dontknowhowtobet
            SBR MVP
            • 01-21-09
            • 2896

            #6
            Originally posted by jbart28
            This is going to have to be covered
            But it hasn't so far, and the media knows about it.
            So how do you explain RealClearPolitics.com doesn't publish anything about this AMAZING info you got us here?

            How do you explain that even the greatest FOXNEWS with their headlines about this have NOT mentioned the word OBAMA not even once in their article about this?



            It's a nice discovery, but linking it to the elections (saying this will destroy Obama) is rubbish and nonsense altogether.
            As I said today in my other thread about the POLLS - what is going to determine the trend now are the POLLS ... not Trump, not Benghazi, polls and the polls only.
            Comment
            • Sam Odom
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 10-30-05
              • 58063

              #7
              hitting all MSM outlets
              Comment
              • Sam Odom
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 10-30-05
                • 58063

                #8
                On Sept. 11, 2012, just two hours after the State Department first began notifying government agencies back in Washington--including the White House--that the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was under attack by armed men, State sent out an email that went to at least two people in the White House that said the group Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility for the attack.
                Comment
                • d2bets
                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                  • 08-10-05
                  • 39995

                  #9
                  Claiming responsibility isn;t the same as having responsibility. Terrorist groups claim responsibility all the time.
                  Comment
                  • Sam Odom
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 10-30-05
                    • 58063

                    #10
                    more evidence 24hrs after attack FOR it being a terrorist attack than hating on a youtube vid which ObamaCo ran with for a week
                    Comment
                    • d2bets
                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                      • 08-10-05
                      • 39995

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sam Odom
                      more evidence 24hrs after attack FOR it being a terrorist attack than hating on a youtube vid which ObamaCo ran with for a week
                      As if you know this.
                      Comment
                      • Sam Odom
                        SBR Aristocracy
                        • 10-30-05
                        • 58063

                        #12
                        Originally posted by d2bets

                        As if you know this.



                        the youtube sham is even disowned by ObamaCo NOW
                        Comment
                        • d2bets
                          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                          • 08-10-05
                          • 39995

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Sam Odom


                          the youtube sham is even disowned by ObamaCo NOW
                          Yeah, sure. As more intelligence was gathered and analyzed, that was the ultimate determination. I fail to see why it matters how long it took the intelligence community to fully understand what happened. That's what investigations are for. They take time. So what. It's not like they went out on bombed a country on false intelligence.
                          Comment
                          • TheRifleman
                            SBR Hall of Famer
                            • 08-30-12
                            • 7284

                            #14
                            yes, I heard the same thing yesterday..obozo just yawned and went to sleep during the Benghazi attack and blocked any troops from being deployed......yes, that's what I heard...they actually saw the attack REAL TIME thru a drone...wow, this IS A BOMBSHELL!
                            Comment
                            • ChalkyDog
                              SBR Hall of Famer
                              • 10-02-11
                              • 9598

                              #15
                              The inherent problem with this kind of "evidence" is it literally only provides one side to a pieced together story. The facts always benefit the side "exposing it" - especially in a national security context, because there is no access to the full lot of information pertaining to the issue.

                              With that said, this isn't even close to a smoking gun, this is just typical document "evidence" posted on the internet about an official failing to do their job. The only difference about this document is it was posted near enough to an election to get the generally politically apathetic up in arms.

                              If you want to nail Obama to the proverbial cross for stuff like this, there is much better stuff out there.
                              Comment
                              SBR Contests
                              Collapse
                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                              Collapse
                              Working...