This summer there are at least two really good books on no limit poker coming out. The popular opinion is that the games get worse as soon as something of quality hits the book shelves.
I used to think that was wrong because most players don't bother to read anything. But I may be changing my mind. Now that Ed Miller's Small Stakes Hold'em has been out a couple of years I see the limit games have tightened up and become more aggressive. They're still beatable, but not for as much as they used to be.
The other way of looking at it is that the games become more popular as more people read enough to keep them solvent. All you have to do is stay ahead of the curve and you'll be all right. Anybody have a thought?
I used to think that was wrong because most players don't bother to read anything. But I may be changing my mind. Now that Ed Miller's Small Stakes Hold'em has been out a couple of years I see the limit games have tightened up and become more aggressive. They're still beatable, but not for as much as they used to be.
The other way of looking at it is that the games become more popular as more people read enough to keep them solvent. All you have to do is stay ahead of the curve and you'll be all right. Anybody have a thought?