SBR please bring back SNG with big buy ins (50, 100 ,200, 500 etc)

[lolguy999]

and small rakes on the buy ins if you will

[lolguy999]

6 table SNG at 100 with 5% rake will reward SBR with 30 points rake every time a game starts. Not bad if you ask me...

[High3rEl3m3nt]

I agree too.

[FuzzyDunlop]

Full Ring SNGs are usually 10%, with heads up SNGs being around 5%. Regardless of the points that SBR would get in rake, the higher point SNGs will move more larger purchases from the store, which I'm assuming would benefit SBR.

[lolguy999]

If sbr is worried about uneven points distribution may i suggest the 50 50 SNG? 10 or 6 players and top half players remaining doubles their buy ins

[High3rEl3m3nt]

If sbr is worried about uneven points distribution may i suggest the 50 50 SNG? 10 or 6 players and top half players remaining doubles their buy ins

As a tournament players and all-around competitor, the double-up sit'n'gos are shameful and promote a loser poker mentality. It would be disappointing to see these tables and not regular sit'n'gos.

[Roadtrip635]

It would be nice to see SNG's, low, mid and high buy-ins, 6 and 10 seaters. We know they're already set-up to do, why not have them available? If they do start them, the buy-in should count towards rollover requirements as well.

[JAKEPEAVY21]

cosign

[BGboothA]

As a tournament players and all-around competitor, the double-up sit'n'gos are shameful and promote a loser poker mentality. It would be disappointing to see these tables and not regular sit'n'gos.

Couldn't agree more.

[High3rEl3m3nt]

FYI for all you fellow chipheads...5dimes runs a nightly MTT reg $20+2 Rebuy and add-on (not my fav) $1,500 GTD tourney. It's not like the rebuy and add-on tourneys that fulltilt and the other mainstream poker sites ran...it's much tighter and the best part.............................
there is usually less than 40 people...tournament usually starts with just 2 tables.

[Wulfman14]

As a tournament players and all-around competitor, the double-up sit'n'gos are shameful and promote a loser poker mentality. It would be disappointing to see these tables and not regular sit'n'gos.

those suck i agree. just bring back regular sngs sbr

[Nittany Lion]

Where is a SBR admin to tell us why this has not been done yet? I want S&G's back

[4uk4life]

My thread died from awhile back. Never got a reply from mods about sng. I would love to see them return. Although my wife would probably prefer they don't hehe

[JAKEPEAVY21]

listen to these fine folks mods!

[lolguy999]

As a tournament players and all-around competitor, the double-up sit'n'gos are shameful and promote a loser poker mentality. It would be disappointing to see these tables and not regular sit'n'gos.

lol i love to abuse those tables because its easy money if you know the the game needs to be adjusted and played... that's it

also if only you can see the "loser mentality" here on SBR normal tables ... all fish but gettin much lovin by the river

[gliblet]

Come on lets do this SBR. I keep getting hammered at the ring games.

[gamemastere]

I would like to see if the sit n go's would do better now with the increase in play there is now. Double up tourneys would be popular with SBR players.

[HeeeHAWWWW]

Would be nice to be able to play SNG with bonus winnings from the other events. Doing the rollover on ring tables is really dull, there's just no-one there except at the $0.5/$1, so it takes forever.

I'm sure SBR can figure out rake/fees to make it equivalent.

[Royfus777]

Sng's would be a good way to use those rollovers, that tourny people don't want to use in rings.

[danso]

Yes, let's work on adding some SnG's SBR!

[gliblet]

How popular were the SNGs that SBR had earlier in the year? I'm sure they would be popular now if they counted towards the rollover.

[lolguy999]

bumpitybump sbr, make it happen!!

[spartangreen]

yeah SNG was my favorite format.

[gamemastere]

sit n go's

wats up SBR? dam!

[JoeVig]

Agree, I like the SNG tables at the 100-500 points levels.

[cocotard]

+1 for SnGs.