poker sites

[sinmiedo]

I had been playing at Bodog for the last year with some succes.
Last night just for curiosity, I open FT site and start comparing some ring games vlues.
I was very surpised by the amounts of the pot value of boths sites.
For expemple, it call my attention the .10 .25 nlh tables comparation, the average pot at FT was at best 3 when at Bodog the average was between 9 to 11 dollars.
Also a few web sites indicate that Bodog has the worst players on line.
What is this forum member's oppinion?

[cappinthepigs]

at 10/25 they are pretty easy games everywhere if you'll just pay attention to style and not get too agressive. I have noticed however that bodog tends to be a little looser than the rest.

[oldstylecubsfan]

Bodog definitely has alot weaker players but thats because its a horrible place to play so good player avoid it. You can only play 3 tables at once and the volume of players is much much much lower then an ft or stars. So its a trade off, play with much weaker players and only get in a small volume of hands or play with a better player and get in alot of hands.

[sinmiedo]

Poker is about money, in my oppinion, so FT or PS has the mechanical poker , that in deed is profitable but not my style.
I love live games and be seating at one table and read my opponents and play with the reading rather with the cards.
Playing a multitude of windows is the way to go, as many sites promote, because gives you the maximun of prfitabliblity, but in my oppinion you left many things out of the game.
Skalansky adress the issue in his books and comments, and I have to agree with him there.
I admire the people that can do that, personally i canot do it, i ry it but i can not do it, and is probably because my style of play.

[1949]

I like ub and pure play, i didn't like ft or pp or ps
absolute poker is interesting though

[daneblazer]

The last thing Bodog wants is to attract a ton of sharks to their poker site to clean out all the sports bettors. There are some good players on there, but the games on bodog are ten times looser than those on tilt. You will rarely ever see a light 3 bet on bodog.

If you play on tilt you need to sign up for rake back and make sure you get their sign up bonus.

[JDUB07]

Bodog is by far the softest but the software is much better at PokerStars and Full Tilt. Depends if your wanting to play casual or flat out grind.

[sinmiedo]

Does anyone has play at Real Deal Poker?

[k13]

less sharks on bodog because I think you can only play 4 tables max.

[RazzFan]

Does anyone has play at Real Deal Poker?

They have a flash room you can check the lobby without downloading. All the times I have checked there has barely been more than one table running.

less sharks on bodog because I think you can only play 4 tables max.

This is definitely true. Those pro players all like playing 8, 10, 12 tables at once.

[Czu81]

less sharks on bodog because I think you can only play 4 tables max.

Bodog is the best for easy cash... Too many regs on the big sites (Ft,PS).

[1949]

Heard good and bad about bodog, i will try itout for myself....but i still like ub and pureplay