sam9ball, is SBR still considering to raise the buy-in to 20-30 betpoints for dailys?

**JAKEPEAVY21** · 10-20-15, 07:36 AM

love this..more points in the prize pool and eliminate the moochers.

**SharpAngles** · 10-20-15, 10:07 AM

Originally posted by Grivas_Digeni

I keep reading threads where people are unhappy because they can't get into a free roll tournament. They can't commit to a schedule. They **have a life**. They wish it was still 2003 and fish just gave their chips away.

So my suggestion would be this.

Make non-pros pay 20-30 pts per tournament. Make pros pay 10-20 pts per tournament. Add the extra points to the prize pool. Either make every payout larger or add extra points as bounties. Those are always fun and they keep tournaments short.

Forecasted outcomes?

Tournament prizes double and SBR may have to give away less points per tournament (collect tournament rake already!)

More PRO conversions because there is demand for **more tournaments** which means people will be willing to convert to be able to afford them

No more bit.hing on the forum. Maybe this one is a stretch lol

Agree with everything here,

and x2 on the last line!

**Robber** · 10-20-15, 03:41 PM

Good idea

Make entry 10 pts

**oChRoNiCo** · 10-20-15, 08:12 PM

Sounds like great idea to me as well!

**downsouth** · 10-20-15, 08:17 PM

Bring back the 9pm

**RudyRuetigger** · 10-20-15, 08:25 PM

Originally posted by downsouth

Bring back the 9pm

how can they bring back the 9pm when 9pm doesn't even exist

**mpaschal34** · 10-20-15, 10:42 PM

crickets.....as usual.

**Grivas_Digeni** · 10-20-15, 11:02 PM

Originally posted by downsouth

Bring back the 9pm

huge lol

http://youtu.be/bVpnUHGpFDk

**Carseller4** · 10-24-15, 10:47 AM

As a non-pro (temporarily) I am totally against this.

Quandary.

**BigOrange** · 10-24-15, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by Carseller4

As a non-pro (temporarily) I am totally against this.

Quandary.

It's a good thing that no one gives a fukk what you think then isn't it?

**jayfly** · 10-24-15, 03:22 PM

As a non pro (with no real intentions of becoming a pro) I would not mind paying a little extra for a tourney. I also would not mind if payouts were a little less for non pros. I play tourneys because I love to play poker and its a great way to kill an hour or two after work and talk a little shit.

That said, ring games need to go back to what they were. Impossible to find a non pro game. I have given up looking.

**tradeout** · 10-24-15, 10:17 PM

Originally posted by jayfly

As a non pro (with no real intentions of becoming a pro) I would not mind paying a little extra for a tourney...

What do you mean 'paying'? as a non-pro and no intention of becoming one, your points are worthless, you are not 'paying' nothing.
So what you are actually saying is you don't mind having your worthless points being deducted.

**jayfly** · 10-25-15, 02:23 AM

Originally posted by tradeout

What do you mean 'paying'? as a non-pro and no intention of becoming one, your points are worthless, you are not 'paying' nothing.
So what you are actually saying is you don't mind having your worthless points being deducted.

thats correct, you got a problem with that? if so f off

**tradeout** · 10-25-15, 04:18 AM

Originally posted by jayfly

thats correct, you got a problem with that? if so f off

I never have a problem with retards.

**Wrigley** · 10-25-15, 06:26 AM

this is a great ideal

**splitH** · 10-25-15, 07:07 AM

Originally posted by tradeout

I never have a problem with retards.

man-made or natural?