What happened to this idea? It was rumored a few times I thought.
Heads up poker championship:
Collapse
X
-
RudyRuetiggerSBR Aristocracy
- 08-24-10
- 65084
#1Heads up poker championship:
Tags: None -
daneblazerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-14-08
- 27861
#2Make it happen SBRComment -
Auto DonkSBR Aristocracy
- 09-03-13
- 43558
#3as long as I get to start with russianc_cksuc_ingrocket, I think this is a great idea......love, AD
Comment -
tatddySBR Posting Legend
- 03-02-10
- 10779
#4They tried once I think...didn't play. I recall the software/setup being a complete fail.Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 61396
#6What do people who like HU play enjoy about it?.Comment -
GUMMO77SBR Hall of Famer
- 08-23-10
- 9294
#7They did have a heads up championship about a year or a year in half ago, and it was a fail. What happened was when you won your particular match you were instantly thrown into another heads up battle with the next open player. Fair enough. But you would take all the chips with you from you previous matches, which means if played and won two previous games but your opponent beat three people then he/she would have a chip lead before a single card is was dealt. I got rather deep in the HU tournament, but my matches were longer than some others, so one of the guys I faced had a 2-1 chip lead on me before the match even started.Comment -
Triple_D_BetSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-12-11
- 7626
#8They did have a heads up championship about a year or a year in half ago, and it was a fail. What happened was when you won your particular match you were instantly thrown into another heads up battle with the next open player. Fair enough. But you would take all the chips with you from you previous matches, which means if played and won two previous games but your opponent beat three people then he/she would have a chip lead before a single card is was dealt. I got rather deep in the HU tournament, but my matches were longer than some others, so one of the guys I faced had a 2-1 chip lead on me before the match even started.Comment -
Wulfman14SBR Hall of Famer
- 08-24-10
- 8869
#10They did have a heads up championship about a year or a year in half ago, and it was a fail. What happened was when you won your particular match you were instantly thrown into another heads up battle with the next open player. Fair enough. But you would take all the chips with you from you previous matches, which means if played and won two previous games but your opponent beat three people then he/she would have a chip lead before a single card is was dealt. I got rather deep in the HU tournament, but my matches were longer than some others, so one of the guys I faced had a 2-1 chip lead on me before the match even started.Comment -
GUMMO77SBR Hall of Famer
- 08-23-10
- 9294
#11I can't remember what the point prizes were at all, because too much time has passed.
Much like when we had a weekend of 7card stud ring games, the SBR HU tournament lacked basic knowledge of anything to do with poker. It would be easy for SBR to ask a handful of posters on here how to properly run a HU tournament (other tournaments as well) and add different ring games -- most people don't like NL O/8 as previously posted over the years--so the poker part of this site moves forward. The ring games have really taken a hit this year, and I don't know what SBR, if anything, has planned to improve that.Comment -
hockey216SBR MVP
- 08-20-08
- 4583
#12Ohh baby would I like a heads up poker championship.Comment -
daneblazerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-14-08
- 27861
#13What happened was that it was a beta-test tournament. We had several posters sign up, the prizes weren't that great but it something cool and different. The main problem was that it wasn't structured like a true tournament. When one player won a match, they were instantly whisked away to another game against another player and kept their chip stack instead of waiting for a round to finish. You had guys with 24,000 chip stacks starting off their match against 6,000 chip stacks. I went deep in it...got 2nd, 3rd, 4th something like that I can't remember, but I met my maker when me and my measly 48k ish stack went up against someone with close to 250k.I think the blinds kept escalating too. We made suggested changes in a feed back thread and the format was never heard from again.
Comment -
RudyRuetiggerSBR Aristocracy
- 08-24-10
- 65084
#14oh i do remember that.
i played, think i went out in 2nd rdComment -
RudyRuetiggerSBR Aristocracy
- 08-24-10
- 65084
#15we could set up a cash game tourney.
send a designated amount to someone, say 200 pts. this way rake is held fairly minimal and people have to show for each round (ie win first 2 rds and decide your 400 pt win is enough and quitting).
play .25/.50 full stack. the winner of that advances and keeps points won along the way.Last edited by RudyRuetigger; 10-31-13, 11:05 AM.Comment -
daneblazerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-14-08
- 27861
#17Ideally in HU instead of battling 4-8 other players to isolate a weaker player you're already isolated against him. Its very table dependent and can have higher variance. You aren't making much money playing HU against Phil Galfond, but if you table select well you can do well for yourself.
You see these online regs bum hunting with a million HU tables open but once you go in there and 3bet them a time or two they bail.Comment -
BigDeem5SBR Posting Legend
- 02-26-11
- 17191
#18I would dominate this.Comment -
GUMMO77SBR Hall of Famer
- 08-23-10
- 9294
#19we could set up a cash game tourney.
send a designated amount to someone, say 200 pts. this way rake is held fairly minimal and people have to show for each round (ie win first 2 rds and decide your 400 pt win is enough and quitting).
play .25/.50 full stack. the winner of that advances and keeps points won along the way.Comment -
Auto DonkSBR Aristocracy
- 09-03-13
- 43558
#20given Rudy's dismantling of my recent rollover attempt, I will only play it if he's in the opposite bracket; and then the best I can hope for is a runner up prize..... dude absolutely owned me.......Comment -
V4ValueSBR Sharp
- 09-01-13
- 368
#21The money!
Different people enjoy different formats, people play the games they are good at and those that don't bore them. I, for example, hate full ring, 9 man's, and prefer 6max games but HU are the best to me (in ROI).Comment -
Triple_D_BetSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-12-11
- 7626
#22we could set up a cash game tourney.
send a designated amount to someone, say 200 pts. this way rake is held fairly minimal and people have to show for each round (ie win first 2 rds and decide your 400 pt win is enough and quitting).
play .25/.50 full stack. the winner of that advances and keeps points won along the way.Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 61396
#23
That's kind of why I asked what you like about it, I want to know. Maybe it will spark my interest in playing if I get it. Right now I often sit out if a ring game goes down to 2 people.
So what do you mean the money? People bet more?.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code