Fight at dennys!!

Eugenics was very common for intellectuals back in the day, until it was taken to the extreme and demoralized.

The basic premise is this. We help our poor stay alive. If you weren't helping the people in that Denny's video out with the basics they wouldn't be able to survive. So that's where darwinism and survival of the fittest fails because those people are NOT the fittest and if they were on their own they would die but we help them.

So in essence we are lowering the quality of humanity by helping those people who couldn't survive on their own. There are some people we'd rather have breeding than others. Do you not agree that you'd rather live next to Bill Gates kids than those people's kids? Would you rather have Mark Zuckerberg's wife pop out 12 kids than Latonda pop out 12 welfare babies? Do you not agree that Bill Gates kids have a better chance at advancing humanity than those animals who can't even take care of themselves?

Nobody is saying to KILL anybody already living, or not help people that are living, but there are certain people that are having more than their fair share of kids they can't take care of. Eugenics was very popular in the last century until the National Socialist workers party decided to start killing people deemed morally bankrupt off.

Do you want to take it to an extreme? Certainly not but what we're doing now is crazy too. We're paying people to have kids they can't take care of. China has already instituted population controls in the past, it would just be our form.

Originally Posted by lyon804

speak for yourself sugar. You are the one that is name calling and getting all hot under the collar.



So you really think slowing the birth rate of some low class, no class kneegrows and white trash that are already government subsidized is a bad thing?? How the fcuk can that be a bad thing? This really calls into question the level of IQ you are working with, especially now seeing how impressed you was with yourself for understanding a simpleton word like EUGENICS as if it was some unheard of word Damn thanks man, never heard the word in my entire life

Slowing birth rate WORLD WIDE would be smart yes. Birth rate in lower class are higher i agree. And lower class population is mostly formed by hipanics and blacks in the USA. But it doesn't mean that blacks and Hispanics are inferiors human beings.

And regarding my comment to eliminate white trash genes, i was being sarcastic...i do not believe in eugenics, remember?

Gohabsgo is the race police.

Somebody said something he doesn't agree with so he has to referee the conversation.

He's a good ref, he doesn't hate anybody.

The only people he hates are racists.

He hates them just because he doesn't agree with their point of view.

So forget those animals throwing chairs at Denny's YOU are the bad guy because you don't like their behavior.

If they kill somebody, they are a murderer, but you are ra ra ra racist and 10 times worse

Agree that Latondanesha is just as good and just as smart as those rocket scientists at Nasa.

NASA flies to the moon, she thinks the moon is a piece of cheese to put on her buttermilk Biscuit.

Don't hate

Originally Posted by Sunde91

Not bad, but what about a fight over a pack of cigs?



Get me mah daam ports' back befoe I nock yo skank ass out cuh

No doubt you will see white and asian females behaving in the same manner, it's just there "socioeconomic status" kicking in forcing them to act like this

OHHHHH........SH*TTTTTTT!!!!! DAYUMMMMMM!!!!!

no way that was over a pack of cigs bro

in this day and age why do people fight like that at all?? Just get a fukin piece or a 9 or a gatt or a glock or whatever the fuk you got and SMOKE errbody!!!!

Originally Posted by gohabsgo

Slowing birth rate WORLD WIDE would be smart yes. Birth rate in lower class are higher i agree. And lower class population is mostly formed by hipanics and blacks in the USA. But it doesn't mean that blacks and Hispanics are inferiors human beings.

And regarding my comment to eliminate white trash genes, i was being sarcastic...i do not believe in eugenics, remember?

So then Bill Gates putting up Mosquito nets in Africa isn't smart, because the nets save lives, and they need to slow their birth rates? Bill Gates giving vaccinations to poor rural Indian kids is stupid, because there are already over 1 billion starving Indians and he's just making more of them?

I'm pretty sure he said to slow the birth rates of TRASH. White trailer park trash, and knee grows like yours truly in the video above.

Originally Posted by C-Gold

Eugenics was very common for intellectuals back in the day, until it was taken to the extreme and demoralized.

The basic premise is this. We help our poor stay alive. If you weren't helping the people in that Denny's video out with the basics they wouldn't be able to survive. So that's where darwinism and survival of the fittest fails because those people are NOT the fittest and if they were on their own they would die but we help them.

So in essence we are lowering the quality of humanity by helping those people who couldn't survive on their own. There are some people we'd rather have breeding than others. Do you not agree that you'd rather live next to Bill Gates kids than those people's kids? Would you rather have Mark Zuckerberg's wife pop out 12 kids than Latonda pop out 12 welfare babies? Do you not agree that Bill Gates kids have a better chance at advancing humanity than those animals who can't even take care of themselves?

Nobody is saying to KILL anybody already living, or not help people that are living, but there are certain people that are having more than their fair share of kids they can't take care of. Eugenics was very popular in the last century until the National Socialist workers party decided to start killing people deemed morally bankrupt off.

Do you want to take it to an extreme? Certainly not but what we're doing now is crazy too. We're paying people to have kids they can't take care of. China has already instituted population controls in the past, it would just be our form.

Thank you. Excellent points, but whenever we are talking facts are common sense stuff the liberals and socialist all come in hurl insults and the name calling starts. None of them will answer this question is a sensible manner either because it is a no brainer for them and it discredits what and who they stand for.



Let's see... Do we want a hurd of welfare citizens in the projects spitting out 8,9,10 babbies by 7 fathers or would we like to see the brighter more fotunate citizens that produce something having more than 1 child??


I don't know man that's a tough fcuking question

Originally Posted by C-Gold

Would you rather have Mark Zuckerberg's wife pop out 12 kids than Latonda pop out 12 welfare babies? Do you not agree that Bill Gates kids have a better chance at advancing humanity than those animals who can't even take care of themselves?

Mark Zuckerberg kids would become good humans and citizens not because of their genes or race but because of the environnement they were born in.

And if these black girls fighting like monkeys would have been raised by bill gates instead of by low class junkies they would have become respectable citizens.

Funny most the girls are between 250 n 450 the beast in the yellow skirt at the start has a rifle arm though she fires something into the wall that had impact I like the one at the end that dressed like a butterfly with red wings an black dots How do you think a 375 LB butterfly will get off the ground

You want smarter people to have more kids, and the trash to have less. One Bill Gates = the whole continent of Africa. Look at how much one man can change the world. If you can give birth to a great person, that person can impact the world and humanity greatly. One Thomas Edison is worth how many people??? What if there were 1,000 Thomas Edisons and they were all able to work together, how much better off would the world be? Now take the other extreme, if the whole country of Uganda just washed away in a great flood what would humanity be missing? Answer: nothing?

FYI: The German National Socialist Workers Party started killing people not reducing birth rates like present day China, they started killing. They also never said Jews were dumb or anything like that, their argument was that the were values challenged. Lesser known is that they killed gays, handicapped people and others deemed less than desireable.

Nobody is saying people should be killed off, I don't even think there should be a limit to the number of kids you should have, but I do if you can't pay for them. If you can't afford kids you shouldn't be subsidized to have them. There's nothing extreme-ist about that. It's common sense.

Most of this happened because it was 10 cent wing day

Originally Posted by gohabsgo

Mark Zuckerberg kids would become good humans and citizens not because of their genes or race but because of the environnement they were born in.

And if these black girls fighting like monkeys would have been raised by bill gates instead of by low class junkies they would have become respectable citizens.

No you didn't just write that? Are you serious? First off I am not going to totally discredit what you are saying because ENVIRONMENT does play a roll. But to say environment is everything is just plain wrong.

Breeding/genes plays a vital role in what kids become. Have you ever heard the phrase "you can take the kneegrow out of the hood, but you can't take the hood out of the kneegrow"? That is very true.


If your thinking is correct than why would horse racing owners pay millions for insemination of past derby winners to there female horses. If environment is most important than breeding shouldn't matter as long as the horse was trained properly by the owner/trainer/jockey... Right? DO YOU SEE ANY CORRELATION HERE???

Originally Posted by C-Gold

Would you rather have Mark Zuckerberg's wife pop out 12 kids than Latonda pop out 12 welfare babies?

a tiny bit better but still pretty weak

Originally Posted by C-Gold

Agree that Latondanesha is just as good and just as smart as those rocket scientists at Nasa.

better, still a lot of room for improvement

Originally Posted by C-Gold

You want smarter people to have more kids, and the trash to have less. One Bill Gates = the whole continent of Africa. Look at how much one man can change the world. If you can give birth to a great person, that person can impact the world and humanity greatly. One Thomas Edison is worth how many people??? What if there were 1,000 Thomas Edisons and they were all able to work together, how much better off would the world be? Now take the other extreme, if the whole country of Uganda just washed away in a great flood what would humanity be missing? Answer: nothing?

It's your opinion but it is Eugenics. What makes you become smart in my opinion is mostly the environment your were raised in.

Originally Posted by lyon804

No you didn't just write that? Are you serious? First off I am not going to totally discredit what you are saying because ENVIRONMENT does play a roll. But to say environment is everything is just plain wrong.

Breeding/genes plays a vital role in what kids become. Have you ever heard the phrase "you can take the kneegrow out of the hood, but you can't take the hood out of the kneegrow"? That is very true.


If your thinking is correct than why would horse racing owners pay millions for insemination of past derby winners to there female horses. If environment is most important than breeding shouldn't matter as long as the horse was trained properly by the owner/trainer/jockey... Right? DO YOU SEE ANY CORRELATION HERE???

It's not all about the environment of course but definitely not about race.
Genetic does play but so does the environement.