Going with the Mets today.

**hugh_morris** · 08-23-11, 07:52 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

its all good pal. its an up and down game. i still look good tonight on almost all other ends. best of luck to you.

what you think of the giants game? im on the pads.

didnt roll with the mets, but i did roll with oakland...and it looks like it might hold up...Cain might be rough on the padre's tonite..in any case, best of luck to ya'....

**MidgetTossers** · 08-23-11, 08:07 PM

these guys crack me up lb..keep doing your thing bro...question?...why the pads tonight pal?...i took the under myself but i think giants win this one like 3-1

**MidgetTossers** · 08-23-11, 08:11 PM

and by the way..how are the shitty a's beating the great yankees?

**lakerboy** · 08-23-11, 08:12 PM

Originally posted by MidgetTossers

these guys crack me up lb..keep doing your thing bro...question?...why the pads tonight pal?...i took the under myself but i think giants win this one like 3-1

i think latos can hang. i see a 1-0 2-1 type game.

**InTheDrink** · 08-23-11, 08:13 PM

congrats to the mets

first run in 16 innings in the series

**MidgetTossers** · 08-23-11, 08:53 PM

a's are gonna blow it..guess i should only bet good teams

**lakerboy** · 08-23-11, 09:04 PM

Originally posted by MidgetTossers

a's are gonna blow it..guess i should only bet good teams

no books just didnt wanna pay a's rrl

**MidgetTossers** · 08-23-11, 09:05 PM

whew

**sjm5122** · 08-23-11, 09:06 PM

I'm on the Pads too LB. Too bad I can't get anything right in baseball, hopefully that changes tonight

**lakerboy** · 08-23-11, 09:08 PM

Originally posted by sjm5122

I'm on the Pads too LB. Too bad I can't get anything right in baseball, hopefully that changes tonight

just try to hit around 49% like me.

**usernametaken** · 08-23-11, 09:09 PM

I had the Mets also. will try again tomorrow

**brahmabull117** · 08-23-11, 09:53 PM

Originally posted by usernametaken

I had the Mets also. will try again tomorrow

the Mets have lost 5 straight games by a combined score of 42-17 (that's an average of 5 runs per game difference). On the season, the Mets are 3-8 against the Phillies with 7 of those 8 losses being by at least 2 runs

Why the fck do you people keep trying to overcome all the odds instead of taking the easy play right in front of you??

**goldengreek** · 08-23-11, 10:00 PM

Originally posted by brahmabull117

the Mets have lost 5 straight games by a combined score of 42-17 (that's an average of 5 runs per game difference). On the season, the Mets are 3-8 against the Phillies with 7 of those 8 losses being by at least 2 runs

Why the fck do you people keep trying to overcome all the odds instead of taking the easy play right in front of you??

Were NYY , TOR AND CLEVE,( I CASHED ON ALL THREE DOGS) AND TB , COL EASY PLAYS TONIGHT ? THROW IS SF AND ST LOUIS AT HOME WITH SHORT ODDS

LETS NOT ACT LIKE THSES PLAYS NEVER WIN

5 TEAMS FAVORED BETWEEN -175 TO -200 OR MORE CAN LOSE TONIGHT

**Julian9** · 08-23-11, 10:21 PM

Brahma seems like the type of kid who heats up bagels in the microwave to have sex with.... just saying

**Jago2008** · 08-23-11, 10:28 PM

Originally posted by Jago2008

If the Mets win I will shave my head, tattoo a penis to my forehead, and find the nearest mall to do the "Happy Dance":

looks like i'm not going to not going to shave my head...

**brahmabull117** · 08-23-11, 10:29 PM

Originally posted by goldengreek

Were NYY , TOR AND CLEVE,( I CASHED ON ALL THREE DOGS) AND TB , COL EASY PLAYS TONIGHT ? THROW IS SF AND ST LOUIS AT HOME WITH SHORT ODDS LETS NOT ACT LIKE THSES PLAYS NEVER WIN 5 TEAMS FAVORED BETWEEN -175 TO -200 OR MORE CAN LOSE TONIGHT

do you understand the difference between a good underdog bet and an awful underdog bet??

betting on the mets is a horrible move

betting on the padres with their good road record and san francisco's recent struggles - good move

does that make sense?? Betting on the mets is just retarded, I'm sorry. This the worst team in the league right now - they haven't even won a third of their games over the last month

**Ralphie1412** · 08-23-11, 10:32 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

no books just didnt wanna pay a's rrl

I like you LB but these kind of comments just kill me.

**warriorfan707** · 08-23-11, 10:33 PM

Originally posted by brahmabull117

do you understand the difference between a good underdog bet and an awful underdog bet??

betting on the mets is a horrible move

betting on the padres with their good road record and san francisco's recent struggles - good move

does that make sense?? Betting on the mets is just retarded, I'm sorry. This the worst team in the league right now - they haven't even won a third of their games over the last month

Im gonna have to go ahead and agree with this comment 100%

**lakerboy** · 08-23-11, 10:35 PM

Originally posted by Ralphie1412

I like you LB but these kind of comments just kill me.

Why?

A's RRL went from +282 to +272 and then back to +275 just before first pitch. A team with a 6-0 lead in the 7th should win by 2. A's didnt wanna do that. Books knew.

**brahmabull117** · 08-23-11, 10:45 PM

Originally posted by warriorfan707

Im gonna have to go ahead and agree with this comment 100%

it boggles my mind how many guys here just (seemingly randomly) take all the ugliest underdogs on the board and expect to come out a winner at the end of the night

Do these people not understand that they have to analyze the matchups and actually determine if it's a good bet or not??? And I don't understand what analysis of the mets would make them want to put money against the best team in the league

**Ralphie1412** · 08-23-11, 10:46 PM

A's didnt wanna beat the yankees by 2? They prefer 1 run wins?

**No coincidences** · 08-23-11, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by brahmabull117

it boggles my mind how many guys here just (seemingly randomly) take all the ugliest underdogs on the board and expect to come out a winner at the end of the night

Do these people not understand that they have to analyze the matchups and actually determine if it's a good bet or not??? And I don't understand what analysis of the mets would make them want to put money against the best team in the league

You have a lot to learn my friend.

You also have a lot of balls talking shit like this given the fact that you lost a huge bet on a "horrible" team and a "horrible" pitcher last night vs. red-hot Milwaukee and Greinke.

**brahmabull117** · 08-23-11, 10:50 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

You have a lot to learn my friend. You also have a lot of balls talking shit like this given the fact that you lost a huge bet on a "horrible" team and a "horrible" pitcher last night vs. red-hot Milwaukee and Greinke.

...and that was my only loss of the week so far (I'm 3-1), so what the fukk is your point?? Yea I lost a lot of money but that was because of horrible money management on my part, not because there was anything wrong with that play. Greinke wins that matchup 4 out of 5 times

and I have a lot to learn??

You have debated against me on about 6 or 7 picks and you have failed miserably on what?? 5 of those?? Just give it up dude, you're in way over your head. The problem is that you're just not in my league when it comes to this stuff

**lakerboy** · 08-23-11, 10:54 PM

Originally posted by Ralphie1412

A's didnt wanna beat the yankees by 2? They prefer 1 run wins?

Yup. Books were not gonna pay out a +275 rrl on oak. You know that. Stop laughing pal. You are making me upset. Dont make me come to chicago.

**Ralphie1412** · 08-23-11, 10:57 PM

Why would you come here? To see a country with a real football league?

**No coincidences** · 08-23-11, 10:57 PM

Originally posted by brahmabull117

...and that was my only loss of the week so far (I'm 3-1), so what the fukk is your point?? Yea I lost a lot of money but that was because of horrible money management on my part, not because there was anything wrong with that play. Greinke wins that matchup 4 out of 5 times

and I have a lot to learn??

You have debated against me on about 6 or 7 picks and you have failed miserably on what?? 5 of those?? Just give it up dude, you're in way over your head. The problem is that you're just not in my league when it comes to this stuff

Just get your rib removed already.

**lakerboy** · 08-23-11, 10:58 PM

Originally posted by Ralphie1412

Why would you come here? To see a country with a real football league?

No. Too come and see the Bears lose at home.

Our beloved Bears.

You still got a ticket for me pal?

**brahmabull117** · 08-23-11, 11:00 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Just get your rib removed already.

never has a video been more appropriate...

**MoneyLineDawg** · 08-23-11, 11:20 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Yup. Books were not gonna pay out a +275 rrl on oak. You know that. Stop laughing pal. You are making me upset. Dont make me come to chicago.

Don't know if this is a joke or not

**hardball** · 08-23-11, 11:44 PM

Originally posted by brahmabull117

do you understand the difference between a good underdog bet and an awful underdog bet??

betting on the mets is a horrible move

betting on the padres with their good road record and san francisco's recent struggles - good move

does that make sense?? Betting on the mets is just retarded, I'm sorry. This the worst team in the league right now - they haven't even won a third of their games over the last month

You're eyeballing basic trends in your first year of betting baseball in the summer months.....Cash out now you're due to regress.

Your primitive model uses macro economica data thats widely available to the public and you think your pounding out a significant edge over pinnacles computers?

GTFO.....

Nocoin, GG, LB have a point, September/ October are going to be a bitch for you.

**dynamite140** · 08-23-11, 11:48 PM

Originally posted by brahmabull117

it boggles my mind how many guys here just (seemingly randomly) take all the ugliest underdogs on the board and expect to come out a winner at the end of the night

Do these people not understand that they have to analyze the matchups and actually determine if it's a good bet or not??? And I don't understand what analysis of the mets would make them want to put money against the best team in the league

These type of wanna be sharps always take the ugliest underdogs because if they lose, no one would say anything to them because the ugly underdog is suppose to lose. No harm, no foul. You think they will get any praise if they take a team -140? How will they get any attention and praise?

Thats why they want to choose the uglyest underdog and fade the most square play on the board to get attention.

But if the underdogs wins they want to get praise for it. That's all fakerboy and that line movement freak no coincidences does

. You should have seen him in nba season.

He makes threads like Washington Wizards +10 should hit and he can see Wizards possibly winning SU and weather the storm.

What happens? They lose by 20+

Of course the thread never gets bumped about because the Wizards lost like they should. I mean, anyone can create a thread and take the uglyest underdog and say stuff like

Oakland Raiders +400 has a very good chance to win
Take the Marlins +250 against Phillies and Halladay
Orioles +175 over Angels

You see whats the similiarity here? Taking ugly underdogs and if it hits, gets praise. If it loses, no worries because its suppose to lose

**brahmabull117** · 08-23-11, 11:49 PM

Originally posted by hardball

You're eyeballing basic trends in your first year of betting baseball in the summer months.....Cash out now you're due to regress.

Your primitive model uses macro economica data thats widely available to the public and you think your pounding out a significant edge over pinnacles computers?

GTFO.....

Nocoin, GG, LB have a point, September/ October are going to be a bitch for you.

another silly hater added to the group

get in line buddy, I have a lot of crow set up for you and you're gonna grow to love the taste of it after following my plays for a few weeks

**brahmabull117** · 08-23-11, 11:51 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

These type of wanna be sharps always take the ugliest underdogs because if they lose, no one would say anything to them because the ugly underdog is suppose to lose. No harm, no foul. You think they will get any praise if they take a team -140? How will they get any attention and praise?

Thats why they want to choose the uglyest underdog and fade the most square play on the board to get attention. But if the underdogs wins they want to get praise for it. That's all fakerboy and that line movement freak no coincidences does

. You should have seen him in nba season. He makes threads like Washington Wizards +10 should hit and he can see Wizards possibly winning SU and weather the storm.

What happens? They lose by 20+

I don't know about lakerboy, because there are a lot of people on this site who claim that he's a succesful bettor

but no coincedences is just a total clown, anytime he tries to debate me on a point or a game, he fails miserably like 80% of the time

**kerrywoodwins20** · 08-23-11, 11:51 PM

Why are so many of Lakerboy's plays in his spreadsheet added AFTER the game is over???

Oh wait.. I know the answer to that one...

**hardball** · 08-23-11, 11:52 PM

Originally posted by brahmabull117

another silly hater added to the group

get in line buddy, I have a lot of crow set up for you and you're gonna grow to love the taste of it after following my plays for a few weeks

No worries, I'm man enough to eat "crow" when its deserved.

Lets just say this isn't my first rodeo with baseball..

I do wish you luck, despite your prick attitude.