American Voters Strongly Oppose Online Gambling Ban According To Latest Zogby Poll Re

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JC
    SBR Sharp
    • 08-23-05
    • 481

    #1
    American Voters Strongly Oppose Online Gambling Ban According To Latest Zogby Poll Re


    American Voters Strongly Oppose Online Gambling Ban According To Latest Zogby Poll Results


    New Zogby poll establishes that vast majority of American voters do not want the federal government to restrict recreational activities such as online gambling conducted from the privacy of a person’s own home.

    London (PRWEB) March 21, 2006 -- The www.OnlineGamblingMythsAndFacts.com website (OGMF) was recently launched to debunk the myths and trumpet the truths about online gambling. OGMF has posted the results of a scientific poll about out what Americans really think about online gambling and the federal government’s most recent efforts to ban it.

    A scientific poll of over 30,000 likely voters conducted in March 2006 establishes that Americans overwhelmingly do not want the federal government enacting laws that restrict a recreational activity such as online gambling, an activity that many adult Americans have decided to do from their own homes. Almost 80 percent of Americans are opposed to the pending bills in Congress to ban online gambling.

    The poll was conducted by Zogby International, a leading public opinion company. Zogby International conducted interviews of 30,054 likely voters from March 1, 2006 through March 14, 2006. The margin of error is +/- 0.6 percentage points.

    The poll established that more than three-fourths of likely voters (78%) do not think it is appropriate for the federal government to restrict what adults do on the Internet in the privacy of their own homes.

    A more detailed summary of the poll is below.

    As the poll reveals, a vast majority of Americans are opposed to banning online gambling. The vast majority of likely voters are opposed to governmental efforts to ban online gambling. This reaffirms that Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of preserving their freedom to engage in acceptable recreational and entertainment activities from the privacy of their own home. The will of American voters is absolutely and unmistakably clear in the area of how and when an adult American should be able to engage in private recreational activities such as online gambling, and Congress should respect this freedom of choice.

    For more information see:



    The following is a detailed summary of the poll:

    Q: The United States Congress is currently considering legislation that would attempt to abolish online gambling. With the exception of something that is morally offensive to almost everyone, such as child pornography, do you think it is appropriate for the federal government to restrict what adults do on the Internet in the privacy of their own homes?

    Yes 13%
    No 78%
    Not sure 9%

    Excluding the things that are morally offensive to most people, more than three-fourths of likely voters (78%) do not think it is appropriate for the federal government to restrict what adults do on the Internet in the privacy of their own homes. In contrast, one in eight (13%) believes it is appropriate for the federal government to restrict what adults do on the Internet in the privacy of their own homes. Nine percent are not sure.

    Q: More than 80 percent of Americans believe that gambling is a question of personal choice that should not be interfered with by the government. Do you agree or disagree that the federal government should stop adult Americans from gambling with licensed and regulated online sportsbooks and casinos based in other countries?

    Agree 16%
    Disagree 71%
    Not sure 13%

    Seven in ten respondents (71%) disagree that the federal government should stop adult Americans from gambling with licensed and regulated online sportsbooks and casinos based in other countries. In comparison, one in six (16%) believes the United States government should prohibit this form of gambling. One in eight (13%) is not sure.

    Q: Many gambling experts believe that Internet gambling will continue no matter what the government does to try to stop it. Do you agree or disagree that the federal government should allocate government resources and spend taxpayer money trying to stop adult Americans from gambling online?

    Agree 11%
    Disagree 77%
    Not sure 12%

    Voters are seven times more likely to disagree (77%) than agree (11%) that the federal government should allocate government resources and spend taxpayer money trying to stop adult Americans from gambling online. One in eight (12%) is not sure.
  • bigboydan
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 08-10-05
    • 55420

    #2
    JC, The sick part is that the voters say don't mean much anymore. These politicians do whatever the hell they want to in this day and age
    Comment
    • Vietbet
      SBR Rookie
      • 08-11-05
      • 23

      #3
      I think this is what they call a "push poll". " Candidate Jones has been rumoured to have had a baby out of wedlock with a crack addicted prostitute, do you think candidate Jones has the morals to be elected to higher office?" However, I do believe a proper balanced poll would still show great support for keeping government out of peoples private lives.

      Did anyone notice President Bush mentioned in todays press conference how people will always get around laws if there is a great demand for something, he was speaking of false documents often used by illegal immigrants.
      Last edited by Vietbet; 03-21-06, 12:40 PM.
      Comment
      • TLD
        SBR Wise Guy
        • 12-10-05
        • 671

        #4
        Vietbet beat me to it, but yes those are ridiculously loaded questions.

        I glanced through that site itself as well, and it’s pretty much all simplistic propaganda.
        Comment
        • JC
          SBR Sharp
          • 08-23-05
          • 481

          #5
          The site is not propaganda. If you click on the detail links you will see the facts are backed up by references to government reports as well as other professionals.

          Propaganda is the BS the politicians throw out there without any evidence. Like when they say online casinos can be used by terrorsists to launds money. I guess in theory they can but so can any business. But they have never presented any examples of online casinos laundering money.

          You want to see propaganda, look at this letter someone got from their representative in the House:

          ==========================

          Dear Alan

          Thank You for contacting me to share your thoughts about internet gambling. I appreciated hearing from you.

          During my years as a coach and educator, I have repeatedly witnessed the netagitive impact gambling can have on people. Even though internet gambling is illegal in all 50 states, the laws are difficult to enforce against violators offshore. I appreciated you sharing your concerns about HR 4777, the internet gambling probation act. However, I believe this act is needed to strengthen us laws against illegal internet gambling. Under the legislation, the wire act is amended to bring the current prohitbition against wireline interstate gambling up to speed with the internet and other new technologies and to give law enforcement agencies additional tools to combat illegal gambling.

          Like and other form of gambling, online gambling can result inaddiction, bankruptcy, divorce, crime and moral decline. In my years as a coach and educator, i have witnessed the negative impact gambling can have on our young people. internet gambling provided young people with an easy mechanism for engaging in this type of risky behavior by allowing them to gamble behind the privacy of their personal computers. the national gambling inpact study commission also addressed the serious consequences on internet gambling in the report released in June of 1999. The commission report recommended an internet gambling ban.

          I am pleased to be a cosponsor of HR4777. This bill works to strengthen the law and allow law enforcement agencies to crack down on gambling sites used to launder money, rob families of there paychecks and addict students into gambling. This legislation has been referred to the house committee on the judiciary. Although I am not a member of this committee ,Ii understand your concern about this matter and will be sure to keep your thoughts in mind.

          Thanks again for sharing your thoughts with me about this important issue. it was good to hear from you .

          Best wishes,
          Tom Osborne
          Member of Congress.

          ---------------------------------------

          Now that's unsubstantiated propaganda!!!

          As to you claiming the questions are loaded, please read this post I just made across the street:

          I don't think the questions are biased.

          The Harris poll a few weeks ago was very biased. Here is what the Harris poll asked and the Wall St. Journal published last February.

          Since there is no effective way to regulate or control Internet gambling, it should remain illegal.

          Agree 53%
          Disagree 43%

          Current technology allows online gaming sites to keep out underage gamblers.

          Agree 15%
          Disagree 85%

          Online gaming sites are a safe way to bet if you can’t get to a real casino.

          Agree 24%
          Disagree 76%

          Now, do you still think the Zogby poll is biased. The Harris poll is extremely biased and the pro online gambling still got 43% and the other side only got 53%. So if you think they are equally biased put the figure somewhere in the middle. If you think the Harris poll is much more biased, put the number in the middle but much closer to Zogby.

          Personally, I don't think anyone can argue that the first question in the Zogby poll is biased. The first question in the Harris poll sets the tone that flows through the rest of it.

          If the Harris poll was good enough for the WSJ to publish, then this one is certainly valid.
          Comment
          • bigboydan
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 08-10-05
            • 55420

            #6
            maybe thats because, in Osborne's last few seasons there at Nebraska he finaly realized that his players were shaving points
            Comment
            • Dark Horse
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 12-14-05
              • 13764

              #7
              Originally posted by bigboydan
              JC, The sick part is that the voters say don't mean much anymore. These politicians do whatever the hell they want to in this day and age
              See V for Vendetta yet?
              Last edited by Dark Horse; 03-22-06, 06:29 AM.
              Comment
              SBR Contests
              Collapse
              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
              Collapse
              Working...