So after a decent run that I've had in the past month, I had a serious realization tonight:
I SUCK and death and taxes are more of a gamble than me picking winners.
All the work trying to pick winners is a great challenge and very rewarding (when it works), don't get me wrong, but I've been on the WORST streak since I started (about 4 years ago) in the past 4 days (3-12) that it has pissed me off so much and I am going to do what every gambler/"investor"/handicapper should do: FADE THEMSELVES and pay attention to their streaks.
The way I see it, and correct me if I'm wrong, but everyone is trying to come up with a million ways to win, but in the end, are you really in the black? Doubtful. Once you jump on someone's hot streak, they lose and so do you. Once you fade a Lang-alike, they begin to win. So why not follow someone who is telling you they suck, figure out their streaks, and just do the opposite. When they're on a hot streak, fade; when their stone cold, double up on their plays?
This brings me to my best (and most logical) system ever - I present to you:
THE COSTANZA SYSTEM
This system is going to be all my plays (or anyone else you'd like to test this with) that I will post (when I can) and I'm going to conduct a little experiment and see if it works - to do the COMPLETE opposite of everything I see holy and want to play.
I don't suggest jumping on this immediately, but maybe check it out for a week and see the results. It could very well crash and burn like every other "system" out there, but at this point, I could give 2 sh!ts and feel dumber than tree bark.
Bad misfortunes to all,
trip7's
I SUCK and death and taxes are more of a gamble than me picking winners.
All the work trying to pick winners is a great challenge and very rewarding (when it works), don't get me wrong, but I've been on the WORST streak since I started (about 4 years ago) in the past 4 days (3-12) that it has pissed me off so much and I am going to do what every gambler/"investor"/handicapper should do: FADE THEMSELVES and pay attention to their streaks.
The way I see it, and correct me if I'm wrong, but everyone is trying to come up with a million ways to win, but in the end, are you really in the black? Doubtful. Once you jump on someone's hot streak, they lose and so do you. Once you fade a Lang-alike, they begin to win. So why not follow someone who is telling you they suck, figure out their streaks, and just do the opposite. When they're on a hot streak, fade; when their stone cold, double up on their plays?
This brings me to my best (and most logical) system ever - I present to you:
THE COSTANZA SYSTEM
This system is going to be all my plays (or anyone else you'd like to test this with) that I will post (when I can) and I'm going to conduct a little experiment and see if it works - to do the COMPLETE opposite of everything I see holy and want to play.
I don't suggest jumping on this immediately, but maybe check it out for a week and see the results. It could very well crash and burn like every other "system" out there, but at this point, I could give 2 sh!ts and feel dumber than tree bark.
Bad misfortunes to all,
trip7's