Williams dumbest fukk in the NFL?

[statnerds]

Fall down you fukkin moron.

Fall down and the game is over.

Fall down and I cash my Under 50.5.

Now I would prefer you to just fall down and die. I can only hope at this point that you cost your team the game by being the stupidest player in the NFL.

Fukkin Canadians....

[Footballtime]

Have to believe the boys would of kicked a FieldGoal atleast there, But i do agree would is a dumb **** and always seems to **** up a play! FBT

[rm18]

they needed a TD it is not like they could run out the clock

[rm18]

unless they shank a 24 yard FG you would of lost the under

[statnerds]

unless they shank a 24 yard FG you would of lost the under

Depends on where he falls. A smart player goes down at what? The 20 or so. Eat the clock.

I don't think kicking a FG up 4, less than a minute to play and zero timeouts for the Saints is a given. Why take the risk?

If you have the ball inside the 10, less than 1 minute, no timeouts, why risk the FG? Either way the Saints need a TD. A FG does nothing to change the plans of the Saints. All it would do is give the Saints better field position to score the TD.

[ProfaneReality]

there went my Dallas -14 +1000 2nd half wager with williams fumble.

[Ninersnut]

Over 48 was the play.

[jjgold]

unreal

Williams wanted a td, selffish play and cost them the game

[unde0087]

Williams is just the only one to not get on the fumble. You can blame it just on him but Dallas fumbled about 6 times

[dwaechte]

Dude, your bet sucked.

The right play there was to go for the TD. The decision was not the mistake, the fumble was.

[stevex]

Tough break. Roy Williams has always been a problem for Dallas.

[bobbyfk]

lost my small Dallas ML play because of him

[statnerds]

Dude, your bet sucked.

The right play there was to go for the TD. The decision was not the mistake, the fumble was.

Here is a lesson free of charge.

If you aren't beating the market consistently, you aren't going to win long term.

It is simple as that.

So when I tell you I hit this Under at 50.5 on Monday and it closed how much lower, you should realize the what a logically flawed statement you just made.

The right play was to go for the TD? In what world? Madden 11 on PS3?

2:33 on the clock? Saints would have used final timeout. Run a play, 2 minute warning. Run a play, eat the clock. Run play, eat the clock. Now you are talking let the play clock run to 1 after the third down play, run a stretch play and eat more clock.

Give the Saints the ball with no timeouts, 94 yards to go with 35 seconds on the clock and say good luck fukkers.

Game over.

At least learn something before running you mouth.

Beat the market or die.

[harlee71]

They would have kicked field goal to be up by 7.

[harlee71]

Dallas should have kicked a FG in the 1st when it was 4 and a long 1 at the 21. That would have killed your Under too.

[dwaechte]

Here is a lesson free of charge.

If you aren't beating the market consistently, you aren't going to win long term.

It is simple as that.

So when I tell you I hit this Under at 50.5 on Monday and it closed how much lower, you should realize the what a logically flawed statement you just made.

The right play was to go for the TD? In what world? Madden 11 on PS3?

2:33 on the clock? Saints would have used final timeout. Run a play, 2 minute warning. Run a play, eat the clock. Run play, eat the clock. Now you are talking let the play clock run to 1 after the third down play, run a stretch play and eat more clock.

Give the Saints the ball with no timeouts, 94 yards to go with 35 seconds on the clock and say good luck fukkers.

Game over.

At least learn something before running you mouth.

Beat the market or die.

You're actually probably right, I had thought they would've had to run two plays before two minute warning. But you might want to actually look at some data before being so confident.

[dwaechte]

Here is a lesson free of charge.

If you aren't beating the market consistently, you aren't going to win long term.

It is simple as that.

So when I tell you I hit this Under at 50.5 on Monday and it closed how much lower, you should realize the what a logically flawed statement you just made.

Also, though it's clear you have the right idea, your progression of logic in the above post is absurd. If you make a standalone bet, beating the market alone does not always indicate a +ev bet. Sorry bud.

[stikymess]

keep in mind these guys are the brightest in society, so him going down I'm sure never crossed his mind. Also it was more of a takeaway than a fumble. Guess he f\*\*k up alot of plays.

[keyboarding]

You guys actually think he fumbled the ball? You fukks clearly didn't watch the game.

[benjy]

Also, though it's clear you have the right idea, your progression of logic in the above post is absurd. If you make a standalone bet, beating the market alone does not always indicate a +ev bet. Sorry bud.

Beating the market is pretty much the definition of a +ev bet.

Though it's certainly no guarantee of a winner.

[dwaechte]

Beating the market is pretty much the definition of a +ev bet.

Though it's certainly no guarantee of a winner.

It's used as the definition of a +ev bet for a lot of purposes, but that doesn't make it so. Obviously his bet probably was very slightly +ev, but to claim matter of factly that beating the closing total of an NFL spread by 1 is +ev is stretching.

[d2bets]

If he doesn't fumble Dallas is 95% to win. As I was watching him running, I said 'just don't fumble'. Sure enough...

[venice2222]

That play sums up the cowboys season.

[rm18]

You don't need to beat the market to win.

They had line Terrell Owens O/U 74.5

under open -115 closed -140

true line I would estimate +/- 750