We've had this discussion before. Clearly I'm not talking about scalps.
I'm talking about deciding one sports bet is worth 2 or 3 times another.
It doesn't even have to be that extreme. We see mlb bettors make a $100 bet on a pick em game and then turn around and make a $150 bet on a -150 favorite.
That bettor is saying that the second game is worth 50% more risk than the first. When it comes to sportsbetting math, that's a tall order and if it is the case, then why waste time and with the smaller bets.
If your wager size is dictated by limits, as is the case a lot, then you can either expand "wide" and increase your outs to get down more or you can pay yourself from the gambling funds, lower the overall bankroll, and make appropriate bets relative to the size of your bankroll.
Pay yourself a salary and work it back up, there is nothing wrong with that, even if you are still just slamming limit bets.
I think I mentioned in a video that bettors at the level of say, LT Profits, will probably do something like this. When accoutns fatten, take money off the top rinse and try to repeat.
I prefer growing wide, but I also prefer a salary from my business.
It takes quite the committment to grow wide, but it can be rewarding.