I was looking at this line because seattle was terrible a few years ago and was surprised it was so tight. wazzu has been pretty bad as well. i thought maybe a talent difference in conferences maybe. what i found out is Seattle has 12 returning players and 5 seniors as well as a 3rd yr. head coach and the team was 18-15 last season (and beat wazzu 78-69).
Washington St. was 11-20 last year and have 12 new players including transfers and a new coach that was good at other schools (Columbia and SF).
In theory i'm thinking the more experienced team would have the advantage with continuity and a head coach that knows his players and vice versa. anyone playing this game or have an opinion on that reasoning?
Washington St. was 11-20 last year and have 12 new players including transfers and a new coach that was good at other schools (Columbia and SF).
In theory i'm thinking the more experienced team would have the advantage with continuity and a head coach that knows his players and vice versa. anyone playing this game or have an opinion on that reasoning?