Sharks just being given game 7 victories

**funnyb25** · 05-09-19, 04:25 PM

Another letter coming from the NHL.

Na, but in all seriousness, ACCORDING to the rule, it was the correct call, even though it had zero impact on the game the guy coming on.

**Art Vandelay** · 05-09-19, 04:27 PM

Magical run will end vs St. Louis. Blues advance to Cup Final!

**milwaukee mike** · 05-09-19, 04:28 PM

not the sharks fault that someone doesn't get off the ice... or that they do a dumbass cross-check with a 3 goal lead

it's hockey, most goals and situations are good luck/bad luck of one kind or another

**19th Hole** · 05-09-19, 04:29 PM

Mike...Game 1 is yours.

**MinnesotaFats** · 05-09-19, 04:35 PM

Originally posted by milwaukee mike

not the sharks fault that someone doesn't get off the ice... or that they do a dumbass cross-check with a 3 goal lead

it's hockey, most goals and situations are good luck/bad luck of one kind or another

The fukkin door to the bench is in the attack zone but the meaning of the rule is to "give yourself up" which is what he did in making the change.

Unreal how refs subjective calling is ruining hockey.

**thomorino** · 05-09-19, 04:39 PM

Not that I care Sharks were the better team, heavily out shot Colorado.

**funnyb25** · 05-09-19, 04:40 PM

They need to make the arenas all the same

**milwaukee mike** · 05-09-19, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats

The fukkin door to the bench is in the attack zone but the meaning of the rule is to "give yourself up" which is what he did in making the change.

Unreal how refs subjective calling is ruining hockey.

so you're saying they shouldn't call offside

**mngambler** · 05-09-19, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats;28617349[B

]Fukkin NHL is destroying itself[/B] by handing this team gave 7 wins in b2b series.

Unreal...

calm down with the fake outrage, call was fine...just cause you lost a couple c notes betting the Avs doesn't mean the NHL is 'Destroying Itself'

**milwaukee mike** · 05-09-19, 04:42 PM

landeskog himself said he was wrong... if the victim doesn't even complain about it then why should anyone else

“Listen, there were 10 things I could’ve done differently on that play. Wish I got off the ice a lot quicker, and I should’ve jumped the boards."

**DwightShrute** · 05-09-19, 04:46 PM

Team of destiny

**mngambler** · 05-09-19, 04:48 PM

Originally posted by milwaukee mike

landeskog himself said he was wrong... if the victim doesn't even complain about it then why should anyone else

“Listen, there were 10 things I could’ve done differently on that play. Wish I got off the ice a lot quicker, and I should’ve jumped the boards."

See my post above, guy just butthurt cause he lost a couple hundo....now all of sudden 'NHL is collapsing'

on a call that is correct if you knew anything about hockey

**eddycash** · 05-09-19, 04:51 PM

West coast is the best coast

**thechaoz** · 05-09-19, 04:55 PM

Originally posted by milwaukee mike

not the sharks fault that someone doesn't get off the ice... or that they do a dumbass cross-check with a 3 goal lead

it's hockey, most goals and situations are good luck/bad luck of one kind or another

Even with the 5 min major, Vegas had no business giving up 4 goals in the last 9 minutes. It really was in less time.

**lakerboy** · 05-09-19, 04:56 PM

So why no penalty for too many men?

**DwightShrute** · 05-09-19, 04:58 PM

Originally posted by thechaoz

Even with the 5 min major, Vegas had no business giving up 4 goals in the last 9 minutes. It really was in less time.

**hotcross** · 05-09-19, 05:00 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

So why no penalty for too many men?

Too Many Men is not a reviewable penalty in the rulebook. Can only be called live.

**lakerboy** · 05-09-19, 05:02 PM

Originally posted by hotcross

Too Many Men is not a reviewable penalty in the rulebook. Can only be called live.

Right but they called a guy offside that was not supposed to be on the ice. So if they can't review the too many men then don't call it.

**hotcross** · 05-09-19, 05:07 PM

Can only happen the way it did for the Avs in the second period. Bench door was on that end.

I know that wasn't your point, but just sayin

**funnyb25** · 05-09-19, 05:17 PM

Fatty, did you just now see the play?

**funnyb25** · 05-16-19, 11:28 AM

I know last night wasn't a game 7, but how many controversial calls/no calls that have all gone the Sharks way this playoffs?

It is a bit too obvious...

**Art Vandelay** · 05-16-19, 12:02 PM

Originally posted by DwightShrute

Team of destiny

After last night's OT "winner", I agree with Dwight. Destined to win the whole shebang!

**pimike** · 05-16-19, 12:17 PM

In all honesty they missed the call when blues hit the puck up and out of play.

No advantage there for Sharks. Was a clear missed advantage powerplay opportunity for Sharks.

So it goes both ways.

**beavis13** · 05-16-19, 12:44 PM

There was also a goal taken away from the sharks in game 2 versus Vegas and instead of a sharks goal, Vegas got a power play out of it, scored on said PP, and came back to win the game. They haven’t gotten every call.

**milwaukee mike** · 05-16-19, 01:14 PM

Originally posted by pimike

In all honesty they missed the call when blues hit the puck up and out of play.

No advantage there for Sharks. Was a clear missed advantage powerplay opportunity for Sharks.

So it goes both ways.

exactly, and the same player that committed that delay of game (and should've been in the penalty box) scored 2 goals shortly thereafter

could've easily been a 3-goal swing there