Is this the year the pats finally blowout the opponent in the bowl?

**gauchojake** · 02-01-19, 05:13 PM

Could this be the biggest public burial ever??? Maybe load up on casino calls??

**Eddy Munny** · 02-01-19, 05:21 PM

If this game is a blowout, it'll be the Rams hoisting the tropy. And I'm not suggesting that the Rams win necessarily... Just that if a blowout occurs, I think its more likely that the Pats are on the wrong side of it.

**The General** · 02-01-19, 05:41 PM

Atlanta folded Seattle folded St Louis came within a yard too Tom fumbled La Rams should handle this. Good luck

**The Giant** · 02-01-19, 05:45 PM

Too many head games, Lakerboy.

Just post your Rams play already.

**RudyRuetigger** · 02-01-19, 05:45 PM

could be the year they finally get blownout

THINK

**lakerboy** · 02-01-19, 06:04 PM

Originally posted by The Giant

Too many head games, Lakerboy.

Just post your Rams play already.

What you talking about?

**pavyracer** · 02-01-19, 06:10 PM

This could be the year Tom Brady retires due to an on the field injury while being sandwiched between Donald and Suh on a sack. Who is Brady's back up when that happens?

**pavyracer** · 02-01-19, 06:12 PM

Originally posted by The Giant

Too many head games, Lakerboy.

Just post your Rams play already.

He is going to post 10 minutes before kickoff he is on Rams for 1 unit to cover all bases like the AFC champioship game.

**Joey Vigs** · 02-01-19, 06:28 PM

Originally posted by Eddy Munny

If this game is a blowout, it'll be the Rams hoisting the tropy. And I'm not suggesting that the Rams win necessarily... Just that if a blowout occurs, I think its more likely that the Pats are on the wrong side of it.

The posts here get funnier and funnier every day. May I ask why you think this? Lol

**Eddy Munny** · 02-01-19, 06:34 PM

Originally posted by Joey Vigs

The posts here get funnier and funnier every day. May I ask why you think this? Lol

Yes... Yes you may. You may ask that. I am willing to divulge such upon asking.

I wouldn't think of keeping it to myself. That's not what Super Sunday is all about.

**krk1030** · 02-01-19, 06:38 PM

No they are more likely to get blown out

**RangeFinder** · 02-01-19, 06:42 PM

One score game.

**DOM-Ganador** · 02-01-19, 06:47 PM

No. No way they blow out Rams.
Either team could jump out and up early. Likely N.E.
BUT, I can`t see a scenario playing out with anything but a close 2nd half barnburner.

Rams win if the D line dominates. Pats win somehow, someway if they don`t put Brady on scramble mode.

**thomorino** · 02-01-19, 06:56 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

My biggest issue with this so called Dynasty is that they never really beat anyone in the bowl easily.

Great teams destroy the opposition. The Montana niners did that. The aikman cowboys did that.

This pats offensive line is the best they every assembled. The running game is great. D is not bad.

The Rams should be an easy win.

Can they finally do it?

You can't compare eras, there wasn't a salary cap back then.

**TheMoneyShot** · 02-01-19, 07:10 PM

I usually study different prop wagers to get the feeling or flow of what may happen during the Super Bowl.

1 prop wager that stands out....

Will the game ever be tied again after 0-0

Yes -120
No +100

I'm a huge believer in the juice going to the house... books know how to rack in the dough.

I just feel this game may never be tied again.... does this indicate a blow out?? Or double digit lead throughout the game? Does it ever get close??? Just food for thought.

**pavyracer** · 02-01-19, 07:14 PM

**DOM-Ganador** · 02-01-19, 07:24 PM

[QUOTE=lakerboy;28390329]My biggest issue with this so called Dynasty is that they never really beat anyone in the bowl easily.

How many HOF offensive players has TB played with? Moss for a year and a cup of coffee.
Not shading Joe Cool, but he had arguably the greatest football player of all-time for all his years.
In Joe`s career, how many missed playoffs and 1 and dones??

So called Dynasty. Jesus LB.

**lakerboy** · 02-01-19, 07:54 PM

[QUOTE=DOM-Ganador;28390880]

Originally posted by lakerboy

My biggest issue with this so called Dynasty is that they never really beat anyone in the bowl easily.

How many HOF offensive players has TB played with? Moss for a year and a cup of coffee.
Not shading Joe Cool, but he had arguably the greatest football player of all-time for all his years.
In Joe`s career, how many missed playoffs and 1 and dones??

So called Dynasty. Jesus LB.

Dom blow someone out please.

Dynasties are teams that don't lose finals. Niners in the 80s and even one in the 90s.
Cowboys with Troy. Steelers in the 70s. Packers in the 60s.

Montana?

He played against great teams in the NFC. Bears, Giants and skins. Even Minnesota was okay

From 1984-1989 the bears and Giants had some of the greatest defenses ever assembled.

Lt was the greatest defender ever.

When Brady played the modern equivalency in the Ravens he lost plenty

**hotcross** · 02-01-19, 08:05 PM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

I usually study different prop wagers to get the feeling or flow of what may happen during the Super Bowl.

1 prop wager that stands out....

Will the game ever be tied again after 0-0

Yes -120
No +100

I'm a huge believer in the juice going to the house... books know how to rack in the dough.

I just feel this game may never be tied again.... does this indicate a blow out?? Or double digit lead throughout the game? Does it ever get close??? Just food for thought.

....or multiple lead changes??

**shocka1212** · 02-01-19, 08:10 PM

if they can't contain the James white flat routes and Edelman slants out of the slot, it could get ugly

**grease lightnin** · 02-01-19, 08:15 PM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

I usually study different prop wagers to get the feeling or flow of what may happen during the Super Bowl.

1 prop wager that stands out....

Will the game ever be tied again after 0-0

Yes -120
No +100

I'm a huge believer in the juice going to the house... books know how to rack in the dough.

I just feel this game may never be tied again.... does this indicate a blow out?? Or double digit lead throughout the game? Does it ever get close??? Just food for thought.

So are you saying pats or rams?

**cincinnatikid513** · 02-01-19, 08:19 PM

break a leg tom

**MinnesotaFats** · 02-01-19, 08:24 PM

Hmmm

Upon review

Aikman + Montana =17 winning seasons

Tom Brady = 18 winning seasons

Aikman + Montana = 7 SB rings, 7 appearances

Tom Brady (if he wins)= 6 SB rings, 9 appearances

I mean, look, the 49ers had the 1 blow out versus Den. They had to come back in both Bengals games, and trialed Miami adter 1st qtr.

Dal got the benefit of beating up on the same team twice, and then an overwhelmed Neil O'Donnell- however that was a 1 score game in the 4th

I don't see dynasty teams as having to blow anyone out- they just have to find a way to win.

Rams in 80 dropped a TD to beat Pitt and Dallas did same in 79, Pit should gave been 2-2 in SB under Bradshaw

Niners, for all their greatness, aren't leaps and bounds better than the Skins or Giants in that era (3,2 wins respectively)

Dynasty is constantly being there in the end...after all, those Buffalo Bills were a dynasty were they not?

**cincinnatikid513** · 02-01-19, 08:30 PM

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats

Hmmm

Upon review

Aikman + Montana =17 winning seasons

Tom Brady = 18 winning seasons

Aikman + Montana = 7 SB rings, 7 appearances

Tom Brady (if he wins)= 6 SB rings, 9 appearances

I mean, look, the 49ers had the 1 blow out versus Den. They had to come back in both Bengals games, and trialed Miami adter 1st qtr.

Dal got the benefit of beating up on the same team twice, and then an overwhelmed Neil O'Donnell- however that was a 1 score game in the 4th

I don't see dynasty teams as having to blow anyone out- they just have to find a way to win.

Rams in 80 dropped a TD to beat Pitt and Dallas did same in 79, Pit should gave been 2-2 in SB under Bradshaw

Niners, for all their greatness, aren't leaps and bounds better than the Skins or Giants in that era (3,2 wins respectively)

Dynasty is constantly being there in the end...after all, those Buffalo Bills were a dynasty were they not?

how bout the fact patriots were gift wrapped 2 super bowl wins by the seahawks and falcons should be 2 more losses on the record if those teams had any common sense

**shocka1212** · 02-01-19, 08:33 PM

Originally posted by cincinnatikid513

how bout the fact patriots were gift wrapped 2 super bowl wins by the seahawks and falcons should be 2 more losses on the record if those teams had any common sense

you forgot about Mcnabb Choking the other one away...

the one against the Panthers shouldn't even count if we're being honest... the fact that it was even that tight against a Jake Delhomme led team is comical.

**Redchevy** · 02-01-19, 08:42 PM

Originally posted by cincinnatikid513

how bout the fact patriots were gift wrapped 2 super bowl wins by the seahawks and falcons should be 2 more losses on the record if those teams had any common sense

How about the 2 freak Giants wins that never should have happened!! Works both ways!! Love NE in a "Blowout here" once and for all a cruise control game NE 38 LA 24 JMO on the subject!!!!

**TheMoneyShot** · 02-01-19, 08:59 PM

Originally posted by grease lightnin

So are you saying pats or rams?

Really don't know... I'm just saying that the team who wins... probably wins by DD

**Grits n' Gravy** · 02-01-19, 09:16 PM

Pats have been THE dominant team for the past 2 decades. No other franchise can say that. They are the greatest dynasty in history of NFL to date.

I would be very surprised if either team won by double digits. Rams have been solid all season and NE peaking at right time.

**wikkidinsane** · 02-01-19, 09:30 PM

LB you said it pats o line are playing great this post season and they will run the ball, and thats how they win this sunday. Its that simple

**lakerboy** · 02-01-19, 10:03 PM

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats

Hmmm

Upon review

Aikman + Montana =17 winning seasons

Tom Brady = 18 winning seasons

Aikman + Montana = 7 SB rings, 7 appearances

Tom Brady (if he wins)= 6 SB rings, 9 appearances

I mean, look, the 49ers had the 1 blow out versus Den. They had to come back in both Bengals games, and trialed Miami adter 1st qtr.

Dal got the benefit of beating up on the same team twice, and then an overwhelmed Neil O'Donnell- however that was a 1 score game in the 4th

I don't see dynasty teams as having to blow anyone out- they just have to find a way to win.

Rams in 80 dropped a TD to beat Pitt and Dallas did same in 79, Pit should gave been 2-2 in SB under Bradshaw

Niners, for all their greatness, aren't leaps and bounds better than the Skins or Giants in that era (3,2 wins respectively)

Dynasty is constantly being there in the end...after all, those Buffalo Bills were a dynasty were they not?

Your post is so wrong.

The first game vs Cincinnati they were up 20-0 at the hf.

The second one the game was practically a pkem. Cincinnati was actually the better team that year and if Tim krumrie didn't break his leg in the first qtr the Bengals win.

They trailed Mia after one qtr? So what.? They destroyed them and Denver and SD. You forgot that one. Biggest shit kicking.

The cowboys were dominant. Now you blaming there dynasty on who they played in the final?

Did they get to play a 9-7 team in the final ever?

Niners won 5 bowls not 3. You made my point as well on how good the skins and gmen were. That's why what SF did was so amazing.

For all of the pats greatness they just reached the ten win in a row record held by the niners

**ByeShea** · 02-01-19, 10:09 PM

Originally posted by pavyracer

This could be the year Tom Brady retires due to an on the field injury while being sandwiched between Donald and Suh on a sack. Who is Brady's back up when that happens?

That scenario could potentially play out on every snap Brady has ever taken since he took the reins 18 full seasons ago. Insane to consider this sort of thinking is influencing betting decisions.

Pats -2.5 is the play.

**thechaoz** · 02-01-19, 10:16 PM

Originally posted by Eddy Munny

If this game is a blowout, it'll be the Rams hoisting the tropy. And I'm not suggesting that the Rams win necessarily... Just that if a blowout occurs, I think its more likely that the Pats are on the wrong side of it.

Exactly. It's not their style.

**thechaoz** · 02-01-19, 10:17 PM

Niners won 5 and they last win was 55-10.

Got ripped off ala saints with the no call on Crabtree

**shocka1212** · 02-01-19, 10:23 PM

Their point differential outside their division is +1 so this spread make sense. Teasing this game in favor of the dog seems like the smartest play