To start I need to state I had neither team in the Pats/Chiefs.But you all know if the Chiefs would have won the toss I think they would have scored.Just seems an unfair end to a great game.
-
-
I think they should consider this for the playoffs, not sure what would be the perfect answer, if you’re taking “player safety” seriously but a team losing without touching it to end their season
Kinda sucks.Comment -
Everyone knew it was over on the coin toss. A 5 minute "game" would be 100 times better with both teams getting 3 timeouts and a 2 minute warningComment -
Basically sudden death what HappenedComment -
It’s not easy to score on the first possession though
Brady threw perfect passes under pressureComment -
let's just make it first to score 3 tds in overtime winsComment -
Yeah I should clarify that maybe just give each team a poss regadless of a TD on the first one only in the playoffs.Comment -
I agree. College rules for the playoffs. Especially with all the high powered offenses and offensive rule changes. Both teams should get a crack. When all the marbles are on the line both teams should get a chance.Comment -
I had patriots and it sucks that for such a big moment, literally it comes down to a coinflip. Everyone knew that 75% of time, winner of coin flip there wins game. I'm fine with the OT rules now for regular season games, but for playoffs it should be each side gets minimum 1 chance. Not right.Comment -
Knew the game was over after the coin toss. Just like the Super Bowl against falconsComment -
According to statistics, it does not seem to favor the team which gets the ball first - over long stretch the odds are about even. After all, the Rams would not have won on that FG in the earlier game had they had the ball first - being second to have the ball paid off for them.
Again, by the numbers it does not really seem to be an edge to get the ball first - just whenever it works out for the first team, when they score TD on first possession, it always brings a wave of complaints of how it favors the first team, again the statistics do not support that though.
Granted having Brady as your QB alters the odds no doubt, but again the rules are made universally for all teams.
Many people also say how college OT rules are much better for reasons like this one. While I prefer college rules myself, in terms of giving teams an edge, I really would guess college rules are much more skewed in that regard. The team which gets the ball second in college OT has a HUGE advantage knowing if they must have a TD or if a FG wins it for them etc. But since everyone views it as "both teams get same # of possessions so it's fair" they are less likely to seem skewed but again according to the odds, I would guess they are. It's similar imo to having position in poker - something which might not seem like an edge when you first examine it but really is huge in the long-term.Comment -
How do you not double Edelman on at least one of those 3 and 10s in OT though? You literally had two safeties covering no one.Comment -
Yes, no doubt you can't apply overall statistics to every given situation. But ok, the NFL designs the rules for all teams/players, they can't make special rules obviously based on who is playing and such. So even though it will obviously be skewed in the circumstance you mention, I think it's kind of a moot point - as long as over a good sample size, many years/teams/players, the numbers say it's pretty even, that's really what matters.Comment -
FOOTBALL THROW CHALLENGE. Whichever team can throw the football farthest gets the ball first.Comment -
I have not seen it recently, but I know awhile back I saw it and it said 47% wins for team who has ball first, 47% for team who has ball second, and 6% remain tied. Granted some of that data is probably from old OT rules but that's what I remember seeing.
That said, if the statistics clearly showed that the team which got the ball first had a clear advantage, don't you think the NFL would obviously change the rule? It would make no sense for them to inherently give a huge edge to the team which happens to win a coin flip.Comment -
Might even draft a GUNSLINGER out of college just for this. STRATEGERY!Comment -
They converted 3 third and 10s on that drive. No need to change the rules again because the Chiefs defense couldn't get the job done.Comment -
The team that loses the flip COULD play defense. Then it only takes a FG to win the game.
I think forcing them to score a TD is fair. You should be able to play D on a critical series.Comment -
They should change it so each team gets a possession. They do it if team that wins toss kicks a FG, why not for TD too?Comment -
Again, if that were the rule it would then really favor the second team as they would know if they have to score a TD to tie the game or whether a FG will win it/tie it for them. Knowing whether they have to go on fourth down or not etc. amongst other things, that would be a big edge for the second team. So again, thinking that would be more "fair", I disagree, in that system without question the second team would win on average way more often I believe.Comment -
exactly. and there is more than one aspect to a football game. defense is part of the team. you can start both teams at their own 40, but much like college there will be tired defenses and continued scoring by both teams. now if you do that and have to go for 2 everytime, that can be a possible resolution.Comment -
yeah i agree as well. its bs that a cointoss pretty much determines the winner. each team should posess it once.Comment -
Both teams get only get 8 downs to the field, do what u can with themComment -
They should just play an extra quarterComment -
College has the NFL beat in this one area. They do overtime the right way giving both teams a chance to possess the ball from the 25 yard line. I'm not sure there is a perfect solution but there has to be one better than one team winning because they won the coin toss.Comment
