Is Boston Celtic's total under 54.5 a lock now?

**seaborneq** · 10-17-17, 10:03 PM

I would have bet the under without Hayward's injury. They played lights out last year and barely won 53 games.

**Mac4Lyfe** · 10-17-17, 10:06 PM

Originally posted by seaborneq

I would have bet the under without Hayward's injury. They played lights out last year and barely won 53 games.

Great point but people really seem to like them this year. I think they took a step back tbh?

**rm18** · 10-18-17, 12:02 AM

Of course it would of most likely hit anyway. They lost 4 starters and olynk.

**dlowilly** · 10-18-17, 12:35 AM

Originally posted by Mac4Lyfe

Lost Hayward in the first few minutes. I don't think the team total has changed yet? Seems like the under might be a good play although I hate locking up my money for several months.

Thoughts?

Where are you betting that team totals stay up after a game is played?

**Goat Milk** · 10-18-17, 12:43 AM

54 games without hayward? Eh.

**jjgold** · 10-18-17, 05:46 AM

no

Tatum will be stud much more upside