The biggest winners tonight... The 96 Chicago Bulls

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MoMoneyMoVaughn
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 05-08-14
    • 14988

    #36
    Comment
    • Da Phoenix
      SBR Sharp
      • 04-20-14
      • 489

      #37
      Originally posted by BigDofBA
      If it really took last night for you guys to make up your minds of the Warriors were as good as the Bulls you must have not watched must basketball.

      Even if they won it wouldn't have mattered.

      The Warriors lost 9 times in the playoffs and got blown out four times times against OKC and the Cavs. I'm talking serious beat downs.

      The Warriors went 7-7 when the finally played good teams (OKC and Cleveland).

      So when the Warriros are about even with two other teams in the league, how can you say they're close to the '96 Bulls?

      THe Warriors would have definitely struggled against the defense of Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.
      At this point we not talking about Golden st being better than the Bulls we talking Birds Celtics, Dr J and Moses Malone 76ers and Magic Kareem worthy Lakers being better than those Bulls
      Comment
      • BigDofBA
        SBR Posting Legend
        • 09-30-09
        • 19311

        #38
        Originally posted by Da Phoenix
        At this point we not talking about Golden st being better than the Bulls we talking Birds Celtics, Dr J and Moses Malone 76ers and Magic Kareem worthy Lakers being better than those Bulls
        I'm late to the party. I was referring to the thread topic
        Comment
        • Mac4Lyfe
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 01-04-09
          • 48366

          #39
          Originally posted by BigDofBA
          I'm late to the party. I was referring to the thread topic

          Exactly... The topic was about the GS Warriors who many were trying to say was the best team in NBA history. Those bitches were gifted by the refs all year long and when it counted they got blown out in half the games. Best team my ass.
          Comment
          • DrunkHorseplayer
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 05-15-10
            • 7719

            #40
            Originally posted by maggiethebestdog
            The list you gave prove my point.
            How so? 30 years old is not past one's prime for a lot of players, especially the great ones. The Pistons' roster in '91 was almost identical to that of '90.
            Comment
            • maggiethebestdog
              SBR Hall of Famer
              • 12-21-13
              • 6700

              #41
              Originally posted by DrunkHorseplayer
              How so? 30 years old is not past one's prime for a lot of players, especially the great ones. The Pistons' roster in '91 was almost identical to that of '90.
              How so??? You do not have the correct ages listed for all players at that time. I will let you figure out who. Also, you once again fail to show how the Bulls did in all series against the Celtics and Pistons in that era. The answer to that is not very well.
              Comment
              SBR Contests
              Collapse
              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
              Collapse
              Working...