Word is sports book won't offer arieta lines anymore

**Jowframs** · 05-14-16, 03:13 PM

Dude geta clue.....not everyone BETS Arrieta
Books Never-Ever LOSE

**d2bets** · 05-14-16, 03:15 PM

There is always a number to balance action. Just gotta find it. Books are not going to stop offering lines for a game.

**omega** · 05-14-16, 03:16 PM

People got hosed last game with the RL. Books will be fine.

**Booya711** · 05-14-16, 03:17 PM

Has there ever been a RL of -200 or higher??

Arietta might be the first soon

**Booya711** · 05-14-16, 03:18 PM

Originally posted by omega

People got hosed last game with the RL. Books will be fine.

Yes...three games in a row the Cubs lost two and won by one run only in those

**mikefan1034** · 05-14-16, 03:19 PM

Ur gonna be seeing -400 moneyline and -1.5 -200 then

**d2bets** · 05-14-16, 03:21 PM

Originally posted by Booya711

Has there ever been a RL of -200 or higher??

Arietta might be the first soon

Maybe June 11 at Atlanta? Will he head in at 11-0?

Next starts in SF, vs. STL, vs. LA, vs. AZ.

**Darkside Magick** · 05-14-16, 03:21 PM

Originally posted by mikefan1034

I heard they are getting absololuty hammered every time arieta starts that they said it isn't even worth it anymore to even have a line. I agree with them why even offer a line when they have no advantage at all because eceryone takes him and everyone wins. It's bad business

**Darkside Magick** · 05-14-16, 03:24 PM

Has a pitcher ever been -400 or over ever?

**Meansteam** · 05-14-16, 03:25 PM

Books should be more worried with Chris sale.

**Booya711** · 05-14-16, 03:26 PM

Originally posted by Darkside Magick

Has a pitcher ever been -400 or over ever?

Maybe kershaw??

**d2bets** · 05-14-16, 03:29 PM

Originally posted by Meansteam

Books should be more worried with Chris sale.

No, because the White Sox offense is a bit too inconsistent. See: today.

**Jowframs** · 05-14-16, 03:31 PM

Originally posted by Booya711

Maybe kershaw??

Kershaw LY I Believe

**jjgold** · 05-14-16, 03:33 PM

**d2bets** · 05-14-16, 03:34 PM

I've definitely seen -400's late in seasons, but very rarely this early in the season. I can remember back when Pedro would be -400 late season routinely.

**Booya711** · 05-14-16, 03:37 PM

Originally posted by d2bets

I've definitely seen -400's late in seasons, but very rarely this early in the season. I can remember back when Pedro would be -400 late season routinely.

Were the RL's -200...do you remember?

**biggie12** · 05-14-16, 03:41 PM

Classic thread.

ONLY AT SBR

**Grits n' Gravy** · 05-14-16, 03:47 PM

Originally posted by mikefan1034

I heard they are getting absololuty hammered every time arieta starts that they said it isn't even worth it anymore to even have a line. I agree with them why even offer a line when they have no advantage at all because eceryone takes him and everyone wins. It's bad business

You trying to take over for the moneyshot as the dumbest poster at sbr?

Books will continue to post Arrieta numbers every single game. It is only a matter of time until he regresses to the mean or gets popped for PEDs. If they don't have the bankroll to withstand this variance then they shouldn't be in business to begin with.

**TheMoneyShot** · 05-14-16, 03:49 PM

Originally posted by Darkside Magick

Has a pitcher ever been -400 or over ever?

Schilling and Randy Johnson.

Can remember what dump teams they were facing.... but they were -400 and higher.

**mikefan1034** · 05-14-16, 03:49 PM

Originally posted by Grits n' Gravy

You trying to take over for the moneyshot as the dumbest poster at sbr?

Books will continue to post Arrieta numbers every single game. It is only a matter of time until he regresses to the mean or gets popped for PEDs. If they don't have the bankroll to withstand this variance then they shouldn't be in business to begin with.

I would say seeweed is the dumbest poster on here

**TheMoneyShot** · 05-14-16, 03:52 PM

Originally posted by Grits n' Gravy

You trying to take over for the moneyshot as the dumbest poster at sbr?

Books will continue to post Arrieta numbers every single game. It is only a matter of time until he regresses to the mean or gets popped for PEDs. If they don't have the bankroll to withstand this variance then they shouldn't be in business to begin with.

Can you come up with something new for once? You're just a tool who gives Durant reacharounds. Nothing special.

**LT Profits** · 05-14-16, 03:59 PM

Pedro was more than -400 several times and he LOST in that role vs. Tampa Bay once.

**jjgold** · 05-14-16, 04:06 PM

most players do not have money to bet big anyway

**texhooper** · 05-14-16, 04:08 PM

kershaw i'm pretty sure has never been -400. maybe at a place like bovada or some super square waste of internet space like that.

**habitualwinning** · 05-14-16, 04:13 PM

Originally posted by d2bets

Maybe June 11 at Atlanta? Will he head in at 11-0?

Next starts in SF, vs. STL, vs. LA, vs. AZ.

If he rolls through SF, STL & LA b2b2b he'll have a shot at finishing the first half of the season undefeated. At least one of those teams should beat him and put up like a 4 or 5 spot on him. I hope he catches the good pitchers on those teams and not the bottom of the rotation so we can see some good games. If he matches up with MadBum, Martinez, Kershaw etc. we'll see some good games. If he pulls something like Peavy, Leake, Wood, then not only is Jake a helluva pitcher he's also a lucky dude avoiding the other good pitchers on championship pedigree clubs.

**habitualwinning** · 05-14-16, 04:18 PM

If anyone was wondering I read something the other day that this Cubs team is the 4th most profitable MLB team since stats were kept, to this point in the season. The other teams were the 2001 Mariners, the Twins a few years back and some older team I can't remember. So the books have been hit harder than this 3 other times and they're still doing just fine. This thread isn't serious.

Oh and speaking of Pedro since other people brought him up, he was >-200 against the 2001 Mariners later in the season. So think about that one for a minute.

**Booya711** · 05-14-16, 04:25 PM

Originally posted by habitualwinning

If anyone was wondering I read something the other day that this Cubs team is the 4th most profitable MLB team since stats were kept, to this point in the season. The other teams were the 2001 Mariners, the Twins a few years back and some older team I can't remember. So the books have been hit harder than this 3 other times and they're still doing just fine. This thread isn't serious.

Oh and speaking of Pedro since other people brought him up, he was >-200 against the 2001 Mariners later in the season. So think about that one for a minute.

The twins are still the most profitable this year...in FADING them

**The Kraken** · 05-14-16, 04:29 PM

Hopefully this thread is in gest

Maybe?

**Itsamazing777** · 05-14-16, 05:42 PM

Verlander was a 360 vs Houston when they sucked when he was cy young

**Grits n' Gravy** · 05-14-16, 06:00 PM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

Can you come up with something new for once? You're just a tool who gives Durant reacharounds. Nothing special.

Go back to eating your bag of dicks dummy. Grown men are having a conversation.

**Smoke** · 05-14-16, 07:16 PM

Not true. Archie works the books and tells us to fade arrieta rest of way.

**TheMoneyShot** · 05-14-16, 09:26 PM

Originally posted by Grits n' Gravy

Go back to eating your bag of dicks dummy. Grown men are having a conversation.

Is that all you can come up with?

You really suck at comebacks.

Durant.... top rated Cold Blooded player in the NBA???

Go fuk yourself.

**iloseagain** · 05-14-16, 09:49 PM

Originally posted by Darkside Magick

Has a pitcher ever been -400 or over ever?

cliff lee was crazy high against balt.. -360 or -380 i forget. i had this convo with someone on here but cant remember.. it was his first start with texas

**Holdin Aces** · 05-14-16, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by iloseagain

cliff lee was crazy high against balt.. -360 or -380 i forget. i had this convo with someone on here but cant remember.. it was his first start with texas

My local had it at -400 exactly, my buddy bet $500 on Rangers and they lost. He lost 2k on one bad bet. Although if not that bad bet it would of been another one. He never met a huge MONEYLINE he didn't love.