Updated series price on blues/blackhawks?

**t-wizzle** · 04-14-16, 10:08 AM

Blues -200

**LT Profits** · 04-14-16, 10:16 AM

5 Dimes: -210 / +175
Bookmaker: -205 / +175
Heritage: -190 / +160

**lakerboy** · 04-14-16, 10:27 AM

Hawks are out of gas. Too many games over the years on 3 dmen.

**newguy** · 04-14-16, 10:42 AM

Thanks - laker - i disagree - I think a ton of value can be found on Hawks here

**jjgold** · 04-14-16, 11:15 AM

never count out hawks

It always seems they battle back

**newguy** · 04-14-16, 11:39 AM

Originally posted by jjgold

never count out hawks

It always seems they battle back

Gold gets it. That is my take. Didn't like them at even money on series price but Crawford played well and they won't go 0-5 on power plays forever. I will take an extra 75 cents juice on a team that lost game 1 on road in OT.

Not a lock - far from it - but from a value play - I think you have a lot here

**pavyracer** · 04-14-16, 11:41 AM

Haws can't score. Blues could have put 5 passed them last night. Crawford will start letting goals in soon.

**newguy** · 04-14-16, 12:19 PM

I have watched the Hawks do that a number of times the last few years. Look really bad in game 1 and even sometimes in game 2 and then its like they turn a corner and turn it on. Getting Keith back tomorrow should help and we will see what happens but just think they are a team you ride until they lose

**jjgold** · 04-14-16, 12:52 PM

I think they can't fall behind 2–0 though but hockey is crazy series change so quick

**USCPHILLYGUY** · 04-14-16, 12:54 PM

took blues -120 series price last night........surprised crawford played so well last night but just think st. louis has too much O......good luck though

**CHOICE** · 04-14-16, 01:13 PM

In 2014 St. Louis was up 2-0 on Chi and Chi won the next 4. Chicago will always find a way to win and St. Louis will always find a way to choke. They are a mickey mouse operation and there is HUGE value with Chicago right now.

**jgj311** · 04-14-16, 02:33 PM

I feel like I made a mistake betting the series too early. I definitely think the Hawks are winning it but in the back of my mind I had a feeling they'd lose Game 1. Should've waited but oh well. And honestly, it seemed like the Hawks played better than the Blues from what I saw of the game last night. I swear they dominated puck possession.

**McDabs** · 04-14-16, 04:00 PM

Originally posted by pavyracer

Haws can't score. Blues could have put 5 passed them last night. Crawford will start letting goals in soon.

lol

**USCPHILLYGUY** · 04-14-16, 04:39 PM

Originally posted by jgj311

I feel like I made a mistake betting the series too early. I definitely think the Hawks are winning it but in the back of my mind I had a feeling they'd lose Game 1. Should've waited but oh well. And honestly, it seemed like the Hawks played better than the Blues from what I saw of the game last night. I swear they dominated puck possession.

not sure what game you glanced at last night rookie.....should have been 3-4 zip Blues

**Goat Milk** · 04-14-16, 05:08 PM

Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUY

not sure what game you glanced at last night rookie.....should have been 3-4 zip Blues

what? the blues barely even made any plays bro. what game were you watching? blues were just out to hit and check. they have no skill whatsoever with the puck. i dare them to try and hit the hawks like that in game 2, they'll get exposed real quick on the break

**USCPHILLYGUY** · 04-14-16, 05:10 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

what? the blues barely even made any plays bro. what game were you watching? blues were just out to hit and check. they have no skill whatsoever with the puck. i dare them to try and hit the hawks like that in game 2, they'll get exposed real quick on the break

so why weren't they "exposed" in game 1?

**newguy** · 04-14-16, 05:43 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

what? the blues barely even made any plays bro. what game were you watching? blues were just out to hit and check. they have no skill whatsoever with the puck. i dare them to try and hit the hawks like that in game 2, they'll get exposed real quick on the break

Blues coach did say they needed 70+ hits to win. They didn't get there but wouldn't expect it to be less hitting in game 2

**Goat Milk** · 04-14-16, 07:06 PM

Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUY

so why weren't they "exposed" in game 1?

maybe because blackhawks missed opportunity after opporutnity. you really think toews is gonna miss a 1 on 1 breakaway w the goalie in the next game or a 2 on 1 chance with patrick kane? lol, that's hilarious. only the clutchest team of the last 2 decades and they're gonna be beaten by a bully team? I don't see it.

**Pride** · 04-14-16, 09:35 PM

^
do not listen to anything this clown says about hockey

**CHOICE** · 04-15-16, 09:56 PM

Like clockwork St Louis finds a way to lose LOL. What a pathetic organization

**DC SeanTaylor21** · 04-15-16, 09:56 PM

that backdoor cover though lol

**lakerboy** · 04-15-16, 09:57 PM

Originally posted by CHOICE

Like clockwork St Louis finds a way to lose LOL. What a pathetic organization

Series is tied 1-1. About right.

**newguy** · 04-15-16, 09:59 PM

Wonder how much swung hands between that empty netter and last second goal. Puck lines and totals. I turned a win into push on that last shot with under 5.

**newguy** · 04-16-16, 11:18 AM

Have they posted new series line?

**Russian Rocket** · 04-16-16, 11:26 AM

Originally posted by newguy

Have they posted new series line?

can get Blues at plus 125-130 now...Ducks at plus 140

**lakerboy** · 04-16-16, 11:31 AM

So wait blues are only +135 with 3 games in chitown? Pretty obvious hawks aren't winning this series.

**packerd_00** · 04-16-16, 11:35 AM

Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUY

not sure what game you glanced at last night rookie.....should have been 3-4 zip Blues

Hows that eh!, Hawks dominated shots on goal.

**newguy** · 04-16-16, 08:29 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

So wait blues are only +135 with 3 games in chitown? Pretty obvious hawks aren't winning this series.

Should be able to make a nice chunk on +135. My guess is you will see blues at +175 or better soon though.

**pavyracer** · 04-21-16, 08:50 PM

Originally posted by pavyracer

Haws can't score. Blues could have put 5 passed them last night. Crawford will start letting goals in soon.

Nailed it.

**lakerboy** · 04-21-16, 08:51 PM

Originally posted by newguy

Should be able to make a nice chunk on +135. My guess is you will see blues at +175 or better soon though.

Bro I like you but your username said it all.

**newguy** · 04-21-16, 10:24 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Bro I like you but your username said it all.

You called the two in chicago - I would have lost that bet for sure - didn't see that happening. I hope you jumped on the +135. That said - I don't think its over (easier to say w/ 2 goal lead I know). If Chicago holds on here - who would have guessed both blues and hawks will have combined for 4 home losses in 5 games. Obviously I am holding out hope here and still riding a Arrieta no-no high!