It's either corruption, or absolute stupidity. It blows my mind, the guy gets as many replays and angles as he wants, and can't get it right over 50% of the time. Anyone see the TD that they didn't give Cincy vs BYU tonight?
I'm convinced there is serious corruption in the CFB replay system
Collapse
X
-
Albert PujolsSBR MVP
- 06-01-10
- 1670
#1I'm convinced there is serious corruption in the CFB replay systemTags: None -
Pickem2winSBR Wise Guy
- 09-16-11
- 978
#2Couldnt believe it! CLEARLY a td with that left foot dragging in the endzone. ALSO couldnt believe how Cincinnati couldnt do ANYTHING in the 4th quarter. 21 unanswered points! NO first downs and a defense that was pathetic. What a difference from the 1st half. Can only imagine that the team was done and exhausted at that elevation. Coach didnt use one timeout in the 2nd half.Comment -
Whoson1stSBR Hustler
- 04-26-15
- 50
#3Games involving BYU I don't trust.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388189
#4Bad
Idiots that's why and plus many of these guys bets with bookmakersComment -
Albert PujolsSBR MVP
- 06-01-10
- 1670
#5That last Oregon TD tonight was corrupt. There was one person in the entire viewing audience that didn't think that was clearly out of bounds. Why even have replay? It's like the movie Idiocracy every time they go to review.Comment -
Ralphie HalvesSBR MVP
- 12-13-09
- 4507
#6Love that movie. And that was insane. ASU got royally screwed on Pat Tillman night in triple OT. Absolutely Brutal.Comment -
JMobileSBR Posting Legend
- 08-21-10
- 19070
#7Anybody have that on footage? I went to bed after Oregon made that TD in the 4th Q with less then 1 min on the clock.Comment -
Da Manster!SBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-07
- 17720
#8here is the best pic that i've found so far on the controversial play in question...I had Oregon last night so I'm happy that I won but I don't think it was a TD either...you can't really tell from this angle but trust me his toes were clearly out of bounds on the other angle.
Comment -
SquareBetNoMoreSBR Sharp
- 07-06-15
- 286
#9I too had Oregon and didn't think that was a catch. With that said, I didn't think they had evidence to overturn the Oregon pick in the end zone in the 4th quarter. I agree in a sense to many in this thread, replay seems to be fairly inconsistent, usually when you have money riding😉Comment -
BigdaddyQHSBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-09
- 19530
#10If you losers would learn the rule, especially the part regarding the evidence, you would understand that the call, no matter how it went, had to be upheld. You guys lose so much money that you will cry about anything except for the one undeniable truth. You bet on the wrong team. Grow the F**K up losers.Comment -
sweethookSBR Posting Legend
- 11-21-07
- 12667
#11dont let it get to you man , its all wrapped around a dollarComment -
SquareBetNoMoreSBR Sharp
- 07-06-15
- 286
#12Pretty sure a few of us said we won the bet... With that logic then how in the world did they overturn the interception? The interception was a much closer call and it was the play that got overturned, not the obvious dude stepping on the line. The rule makes perfect sense. I'm okay with the TD standing, but if it stands then there is no way the pick has "enough evidence" of not being a pick.Comment -
Da Manster!SBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-07
- 17720
#13^^^...totally agree SquareBetnomore!.......I was saying to myself that the was the proverbial make up call for Oregon on the dude stepping out of the endzone because they fukked up the interception call which by the way was a legit interception and sure as hell no replay evidence was conclusive enough to overturn it like they did...
Comment -
ZINISTERRestricted User
- 10-03-12
- 1651
#14BigdaddyQH is a "PRO"!!!!His words are so strong.Get a life-you douche.Comment -
POOLSIDESBR MVP
- 09-06-14
- 2839
#15Was also on Oregon. Here's the thing about that touchdown. First off, there wasn't enough evidence either way to overturn whatever the call on the field was. Second, I think it was a catch. That picture that Manster posted is a frame or two late. Back it up to when he first catches the ball. I mean, the moment of. At this moment, his right toe is clearly dragging. That's not up for debate. His left foot however, only the heel is touching the ground. The toe is not yet out of bounds. It's a very Sean Elliot-esque play, but I think because it's college and he clearly had the right row dragging BEFORE his left toe hits the line, touchdown.Comment -
Vegas39BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-22-11
- 30686
#16Was also on Oregon. Here's the thing about that touchdown. First off, there wasn't enough evidence either way to overturn whatever the call on the field was. Second, I think it was a catch. That picture that Manster posted is a frame or two late. Back it up to when he first catches the ball. I mean, the moment of. At this moment, his right toe is clearly dragging. That's not up for debate. His left foot however, only the heel is touching the ground. The toe is not yet out of bounds. It's a very Sean Elliot-esque play, but I think because it's college and he clearly had the right row dragging BEFORE his left toe hits the line, touchdown.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82489
#17What I don't understand is the refs have to made a call first and then the replay ref has to decide. Why not don't make a call first and let the replay guy decide instead of putting him at the spot?Comment -
TwoWaysSBR Posting Legend
- 03-24-10
- 13145
#18All sports is fixed. It's well known. The public can take 5 seconds of a replay, and the majority could come to the right conclusions. But these fckers always get it wrongComment -
Albert PujolsSBR MVP
- 06-01-10
- 1670
#19If you losers would learn the rule, especially the part regarding the evidence, you would understand that the call, no matter how it went, had to be upheld. You guys lose so much money that you will cry about anything except for the one undeniable truth. You bet on the wrong team. Grow the F**K up losers.Comment -
Albert PujolsSBR MVP
- 06-01-10
- 1670
#20Was also on Oregon. Here's the thing about that touchdown. First off, there wasn't enough evidence either way to overturn whatever the call on the field was. Second, I think it was a catch. That picture that Manster posted is a frame or two late. Back it up to when he first catches the ball. I mean, the moment of. At this moment, his right toe is clearly dragging. That's not up for debate. His left foot however, only the heel is touching the ground. The toe is not yet out of bounds. It's a very Sean Elliot-esque play, but I think because it's college and he clearly had the right row dragging BEFORE his left toe hits the line, touchdown.Comment -
eeezzzzSBR Wise Guy
- 08-24-12
- 703
#21If you losers would learn the rule, especially the part regarding the evidence, you would understand that the call, no matter how it went, had to be upheld. You guys lose so much money that you will cry about anything except for the one undeniable truth. You bet on the wrong team. Grow the F**K up losers.Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#22If you losers would learn the rule, especially the part regarding the evidence, you would understand that the call, no matter how it went, had to be upheld. You guys lose so much money that you will cry about anything except for the one undeniable truth. You bet on the wrong team. Grow the F**K up losers.
Not one poster above him said they bet the losing team and 2 of the 9 were on the winning team.
What's wrong with this guy?
Maybe he's just one of Big Bear's or TTWarriors other handles. There's something wrong with those guys too.
Bigdaddy, no beef really, unless you continue to fail to read before you respond and call others names.
Comment -
Vegas39BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-22-11
- 30686
#23lol...this guy didn't even read what others posted in this thread yet he talked some wierd kind of shit.
Not one poster above him said they bet the losing team and 2 of the 9 were on the winning team.
What's wrong with this guy?
Maybe he's just one of Big Bear's or TTWarriors other handles. There's something wrong with those guys too.
Bigdaddy, no beef really, unless you continue to fail to read before you respond and call others names.
He is just a plain idiotComment -
WillysmagicSBR Sharp
- 09-10-15
- 469
#27Arizona State was a horrible instant replay call. I'm convinced that a lot of people are on the take in college ballComment -
Albert PujolsSBR MVP
- 06-01-10
- 1670
-
Albert PujolsSBR MVP
- 06-01-10
- 1670
#29What a joke. I have Auburn, but Ole Miss just got absolutely screwed by yet another retarded or cheating replay official.Comment -
JameisBradySBR MVP
- 03-15-15
- 1023
#31here is the best pic that i've found so far on the controversial play in question...I had Oregon last night so I'm happy that I won but I don't think it was a TD either...you can't really tell from this angle but trust me his toes were clearly out of bounds on the other angle.
Comment -
daneblazerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-14-08
- 27861
-
The KrakenBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-25-11
- 28917
Comment -
WrongsideSBR MVP
- 09-26-15
- 3579
#35They made the wrong call on whistling that too soon. Should have been a touchdown the other way. If they would have overturned it and said fumble, it would have been only drawn attention to that fact. They took the cowards way out.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code