NCAA FB 2024-25 System Picks Week 7

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Aunty808
    SBR High Roller
    • 09-18-22
    • 193

    #1
    NCAA FB 2024-25 System Picks Week 7
    BEST BETS
    ** Stronger Plays
    **UNLV-19 @Utah St
    **Miss St @ Geo-34'
    ** UAB @ Army -26

    Toledo -9' @ Buff
    App St @ :Laff -10'
    N Texas -7 @ Fla Atl
    Ark St @ Texas St -14'
    =======================================

    Public Contest Dogs (Early Look)
    Consensus as of Tuesday 11 a.m. Hawaii time
    Will update as needed.

    FADE THE DOG
    Group 1 51%-54% YTD/ATS 1-3-0
    Group 2 55%-59% YTD/ATS 2-0-2
    Group 3 60%-100% YTD/ATS 5-1-0
    ==========
    Group 1
    53% Clemson @ WF+20'

    Group 2
    55% Stanford+23 @ ND
    56% Kan St @ Col+4
    56% Cinn+3' @ UCF
    57% Ohio St @ Oreg+3'
    58% Texas @ Okl+14
    59% Vandy+13' @ Kentucky

    Group 3
    62% UTSA @ Rice+6
    ================
    I've decided to just do the System Plays for the above two groups. I'll just post the 7-0 group for those interested.

    7-0 Dogs
    Mia Oh @ EMich +3'
    Marsh @ Geo So +1'
    AF+4 @ NMex

    7-0 Favs
    Utep @ W Kentucky-18
    Northwestern @ Maryland-9'
    Ariz @ BYU -3'
    So Miss @ ULMon -6

    GL2A
  • Aunty808
    SBR High Roller
    • 09-18-22
    • 193

    #2
    Adding to Group 1
    54% FIU+16 @ Liberty
    Comment
    • Aunty808
      SBR High Roller
      • 09-18-22
      • 193

      #3
      Update

      I should've added the Summary from last weeks post but was in a rush and missed posting it here.

      Public Contest Dogs
      Summary: Your best bets out of this Subset from the System will come from Groups 2 and 3. A team that also has a 4-3 consensus is the stronger pick in those groups.
      Group 1 should be the NO PLAY teams or PLAY ON the dogs to win the ML.

      Group 1
      53% Clemson @ WF+20'
      54% FIU+16 @ Liberty

      Group 2
      55% Stanford+23 @ ND
      56% Kan St @ Col+4
      56% Cinn+3' @ UCF
      57% Ohio St @ Oreg+3'
      58% Texas @ Okl+14
      59% Vandy+13' @ Kentucky

      Group 3
      62% UTSA @ Rice+6
      ==========================

      Update
      Group 1
      51% Clemson @ WF+20'
      If it falls out of the 50%, it's a NO PLAY.



      Comment
      • Aunty808
        SBR High Roller
        • 09-18-22
        • 193

        #4
        Update

        Group 1 51%-54%
        47% Clemson @ WF+20' NO PLAY
        52% Ohio St @ Oreg +3' (was Group 2 @ 57%)
        53% Penn St @ USC +4' (added)
        54% No Ill +3 @ B Green ( added)
        54% Cinn +3 @ UCF (was Group 2 @ 56%)


        Group 2 55%-59%
        58% Stanford+23 @ ND (was 55%)
        57% Kan St @ Col+4 (was 56% / line now +3')
        59% Texas @ Okl+14 (was 58%)
        58% Vandy+13' @ Kentucky (was 59%)
        57%% UTSA @ Rice+6 (was Group 3 @ 62%)

        Group 3 60% -100%
        N/A

        ==========================
        Next update Friday evening/early Sat morning.
        GL2A
        Comment
        • Aunty808
          SBR High Roller
          • 09-18-22
          • 193

          #5
          Breakdown for the UAB @ Army Game

          UAB @ Army -26


          I have some extra time on hand so I'll do the numbers for the UAB @ Army game.
          For comparison, I'll first do the Army/Tulsa game from last week.


          Team/SRS/Y-PAD-Y-RAD (Yards Per Pass Attempt Diff- Yards Per Rush Attempt Diff)
          Army-14 +12.90/+4.2 - +5.0
          Army passes for 10.3 yards per attempt and gives up 6.1 yards per attempt, difference of +4.2 yards.
          Army rushes for 6.5 yards per attempt and gives up 1.5 yards per attempt, difference of +5.0 yards.


          Tulsa -10.22/-4.0 - +.5
          Tulsa passes for 5.8 yards per attempt and gives up 9.8 yards per attempt, difference of -4.0 yards.
          Tulsa rushes for 4.3 yards per attempt and gives up 3.8 yards per attempt, difference of +.5 yards


          Game Results
          Army 48-7
          Army passed for 26.6 yards per attempt and rushed for 8.0 yards per attempt.
          Tulsa passed for 3.6 yards per attempt and rushed for 3.6 yards per attempt.
          ==============================


          UAB -777/-.2 - -2.0
          Army -26 +12.96/ +8.2 - +4.3


          UAB passes for 6.4 yards per attempt and gives up 6.6 yards per attempt, difference of -.2 yards.
          UAB rushes for 3.5 yards per attempt and gives up 5.7 yards per attempt, difference of -2.0 yards.


          Army passes for 13.7 yards per attempt and gives up 5.5 yards per attempt, difference of +8.2 yards.
          Army rushes for 6.8 yards per attempt and gives up 2.5 yards per attempt, difference of +4.3 yards.


          Opinion: Army will shut down UAB's running game and force them to pass. UAB may have some success passing the ball, but will it be enough to keep up with Army?
          The Military Academy teams are disciplined teams so I don't think penalties against Army will be a factor. IMHO, the only way Army loses this game will be due to turnovers.
          But what do I know........that's why they play the game!


          GL2A
          Comment
          • Aunty808
            SBR High Roller
            • 09-18-22
            • 193

            #6
            Update

            7-0 Dogs
            Mia Oh @ EMich +3'
            Marsh @ Geo So +1'
            AF+4 @ NMex


            Update- Geo So is no longer a dog, now Marsh+1 . A trend that I follow is when a
            team opens as an underdog, then turns to a favorite, that team becomes a FADE.
            Marsh+1 is now a Public Contest Dog in Group 3 with a 58% consensus.


            Group 1
            51%-54%

            WF+20' is no longer a play. (Clemson 56%)
            54% FIU+16 @ Liberty 24-31 LW
            51% Penn St @ USC +3' (line was +4')
            52% Miss @ LSU +3'
            53% Cinn+3 @ UCF
            53% Mia Oh @ E Mich+2'



            Group 2 55%-59%
            Oreg+3 is no longer a play. (Ohio St 52%)
            55% No Ill+3 @ B Green
            57% Stanford +23 @ ND
            57% Kan St @ Col+3'
            58% Vandy+13' @ Kentucky
            58% UTSA @ Rice +6
            58% Marsh +1 @ Geo Sou
            59% Texas @ Oklahoma +14'
            Comment
            • Aunty808
              SBR High Roller
              • 09-18-22
              • 193

              #7
              Final Update

              Final Update

              FADE THE DOG
              Group 1 51%-54% YTD/ATS 1-3-0
              Group 2 55%-59% YTD/ATS 2-0-2
              Group 3 60%-100% YTD/ATS 5-1-0

              Public Contest Dogs
              Summary: Your best bets out of this Subset from the System will come from Groups 2 and 3. A team that also has a 4-3 consensus is the stronger pick in those groups.
              Group 1 should be the NO PLAY teams or PLAY ON the dogs to win the ML.

              Group 1 51%-54%
              WF+20' is no longer a play. (Clemson 56%)
              54% FIU+16 @ Liberty 24-31 LW
              51% Penn St @ USC +3' (line was +4')
              54% No Ill+3 @ B Green


              Group 2 55%-59%

              Oreg+3 is no longer a play. (Ohio St 52%)
              55% Cinn+3 @ UCF
              55% No Ill+3 @ B Green
              56% Miss @ LSU +3'
              57% Kan St @ Col+3'
              58% Stanford +23 @ ND
              58% Vandy+13' @ Kentucky
              **58% Marsh +1 @ Geo Sou (Play ON Marshall)
              59% UTSA @ Rice +6
              59% Texas @ Oklahoma +14'
              59% Mia Oh @ E Mich+2'

              **
              Geo So is no longer a dog, now Marsh+1 . A trend that I follow is when a

              team opens as an underdog, then turns to a favorite, that team becomes a FADE.
              Marsh+1 is now a Public Contest Dog in Group 3 with a 58% consensus.

              Group 3
              N/A

              GL2A
              Comment
              • Aunty808
                SBR High Roller
                • 09-18-22
                • 193

                #8
                Results/Summary

                Results/Summary
                That dreaded week showed up. Regression sucks. Just makes me want to quit sometimes.


                Instead of typing up the whole System Plays, I'll just summarize them here.
                Overall System picks : ATS 21-27-4 (44.231%) -$870 Fake money (Contest)


                Best Bets: Only survivors of this week's massacre were Army and Texas St.


                Groups 1/2: I guess Vegas wanted to keep their dog players happy this week and let them win. Watch next week, they will be donating their winnings and the books will be more than happy to accept said donations.


                Group 1: USC lost the game but won ATS by a half point. No Illinois moved to 55% and was no longer a Group 1 play. They won S/U so it was a good mistake leaving them there.


                Group 2: Notre Dame and Texas showed up and won, while Marshall teased us with the lead only to give it up and lose the game, pushing ATS, thank you football Gods. Kansas St HAD a healthy lead but gave it up and let Colorado win ATS with the half point. The rest of the group got the memo from Vegas and didn't show up.


                7-0 Fade the Dogs: Yippeeee! We won! Two for two, thank you Air Force and E Mich!


                7-0 Play on the Fav: W Kentucky and BYU won, Maryland and ULMon didn't.


                That's the skinny on Week 7. Total FAIL.


                Moving on the Week 8, I am thinking of changing my strategy . Do all the numbers and just find the POY, GOM, LOCK....lol....type games.
                I read too much. I read on another board about rushing/passing stats. I applied it using my Y-RAD stat to find the teams that fit that theory. Army and Boise St both popped out like a sore thumb. Army won by a wide margin while Boise ended up pushing ATS. I think they were enjoying their hawaiian vacation too much.
                ================================
                At least I got the Army game right. They did shut down UAB's rushing game, forcing them to pass. They only had 4 penalties in the game. Here's the results of that game.


                UAB Y-PAD 39/242( 6.2 yds) Y-RAD 24/61 (2.5 yds)
                Army Y-PAD 8/102 (12.8 yds) Y-RAD 56/413 (7.4 yds)


                Here's the stat that I read about rushing
                Teams that outrush their opponents by 125 yards or more cover the line more than 80% as long as their opponent's average passing ypg is less than 220.



                UAB 215.2 YPG and Army outrushed UAB by +352 yards. Winner winner, chicken dinner!
                Although Boise St outrushed Hawaii by +215 yards, Hawaii didn't meet the YPG, which is 253.8 YPG.
                Maybe I'll call these plays the RUN FORREST RUN plays.....lol....


                Anyways, on to Week 8......
                GL2A
                Comment
                SBR Contests
                Collapse
                Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                Collapse
                Working...