I tend to believe the previous games do affect the "outcome" in some way ...
We had 3 games yesteday, 2 went under (one big under 173.5) and one went barely over the line of 160.5 (Seattle and Connecticut).
June 18 PHX NY ended with 160 pts (2 pts under the line of 162) Aces 155 pts (with line of 169.5), and June 15 Aces went 159 in total where the line was 167.5 and PHX and WAS barely went over 156 pts scoring 157 pts in total.
This entire "under" environment makes me feel like as if we'd finally hit the over tonight and it could be 170-180 or so or even more.
How do you guys see it? Do you see it in the same way or under is the play, again?
We had 3 games yesteday, 2 went under (one big under 173.5) and one went barely over the line of 160.5 (Seattle and Connecticut).
June 18 PHX NY ended with 160 pts (2 pts under the line of 162) Aces 155 pts (with line of 169.5), and June 15 Aces went 159 in total where the line was 167.5 and PHX and WAS barely went over 156 pts scoring 157 pts in total.
This entire "under" environment makes me feel like as if we'd finally hit the over tonight and it could be 170-180 or so or even more.
How do you guys see it? Do you see it in the same way or under is the play, again?