Donald Trump To Run For President in 2016!!!!!!!!

[Optional]

The accusation that a previous president caused too much damage to recover from, had been proved as false. 5 years to rebound is the standard....

I think both Bush and Obama had massive setbacks to overcome during their terms that make it hard to compare their economic performance with the previous three, who all got to ride relatively good economic times.

[PittsburghPlayer]

I am guessing that your new year's resolution was to make incoherent posts on sbr for the entire year. If so, congrats.

Not totally incoherent.

You must be a bigger idiot than we thought.

[DwightShrute]

I see you at all trailer parks I pass by.

Ooops, sorry.

Disrespectful to those in trailer parks.

at least that was understandable and even somewhat funny. There goes the resolution.

[jtoler]

"The Democratic and Republican Parties are virtual opposites of each other in their economic records, going back to the earliest period for which economic data were available, around 1910. More than a dozen studies have been done comparing economic growth, unemployment, average length of unemployment, stock market performance, inflation, federal debt, and other economic indicators, during Democratic and Republican presidencies and congresses, and they all show stunningly better performance when Democrats are in power, than when Republicans are. These studies are all available online, and they are all summarized and discussed in this path-breaking book, which settles, once and for all, the question of whether there’s any significant economic difference between the two Parties. Not only is there a difference, but – shockingly – it always runs in favor of Democrats in power. There might be other types of reasons for voting Republican, but all of the economic reasons favor voting for Democrats. Regarding economic performance, the two Parties aren’t even close. "

[grease lightnin]

I think both Bush and Obama had massive setbacks to overcome during their terms that make it hard to compare their economic performance with the previous three, who all got to ride relatively good economic times.

Nah. Bush 1 had a recession. That is mostly why he was a 1 termer

[PittsburghPlayer]

at least that was understandable and even somewhat funny. There goes the resolution.

I tried to apologize the other day...
maybe I should lay off of you and do the same for brooks -
fukk Brooks,
but you are officially laid-off!!

[khicks26]

nonsense

Blame bush all you want but the facts prove the democrats were largely responsible for the economic crisis. Bush didn't do enough to stop it. No one did but he should have. He was the president. Only shows how there really no difference between the two parties.

Bull Shit nobody forced the banks to give out loans. They knew they were giving loans to people that would never pay them back. That's why the bundled them up & sold them as AAA, a fake rating. Then backed them with fake insurance with AIG.

Do really think it all can be explained in a video 11 mins long? With music playing. This explains why you like Pumpkin Head.

[brooks85]

Bull Shit nobody forced the banks to give out loans. They knew they were giving loans to people that would never pay them back. That's why the bundled them up & sold them as AAA, a fake rating. Then backed them with fake insurance with AIG.

Do really think it all can be explained in a video 11 mins long? With music playing. This explains why you like Pumpkin Head.

stop lying khicks

[khicks26]

No because if this was a schoolyard I would have beat the fukk out of you a long time ago. You would never have the balls to speak to any of us like that to our faces

And no I am not wrong, many things did cause it. And the economic data have improved every year since obama has been in office.

LOL

[brooks85]

^lol I laughed too

[khicks26]

stop lying khicks

Everyone on Wall St knew the loans were ninjas. Sorry it don't fit your right wing BS narrative.

[brooks85]

Everyone on Wall St knew the loans were ninjas. Sorry it don't fit your right wing BS narrative.

wow, two lies in a row. Think before you post.

[khicks26]

Trump has reinvigorated the common sense mindset in America. Spin it all you want but that's the truth. Unfortunately common sense ain't all that common.

The Great White Hope.

[DwightShrute]

[khicks26]

wow, two lies in a row. Think before you post.

OH yeah you went to college. Can't believe your still eating those lies. Such a fuking system puppet you are.

You will lose your ass on Wall St, then Trump & the police state will fuk it for you. Clown.

[khicks26]

More BS Dwight, Sanders does not have a superpac. Now Pumpkin Head is begging the real billionaires for money.

[brooks85]

OH yeah you went to college. Can't believe your still eating those lies. Such a fuking system puppet you are.

You will lose your ass on Wall St, then Trump & the police state will fuk it for you. Clown.

and know how to use google and the search engine on craigslist, don't forget.


The fact is they were forced to give out loans to people who didn't deserve them so, of course, they found a way to not get left holding the bag because of some liberal agenda.

Also, most people on wall st did not know the loans were bad or the market collapse wouldn't have been as bad you putz. Trying using your brain to re-read what you type to make sure it makes sense.


You should go watch the big short. It is entertaining and will help you understand what happened in a way that will keep your attention like a youtube video.

[DwightShrute]

Originally Posted by khicks26
More BS Dwight, Sanders does not have a superpac.

sure he does.

[khicks26]

and know how to use google and the search engine on craigslist, don't forget.


The fact is they were forced to give out loans to people who didn't deserve them so, of course, they found a way to not get left holding the bag because of some liberal agenda.

Also, most people on wall st did not know the loans were bad or the market collapse wouldn't have been as bad you putz. Trying using your brain to re-read what you type to make sure it makes sense.


You should go watch the big short. It is entertaining and will help you understand what happened in a way that will keep your attention like a youtube video.

LOL you stupid sheep.

[khicks26]

sure he does.

Show them to me.

[brooks85]

LOL you stupid sheep.

great non-response to facts!

[DwightShrute]

Show them to me.

google it. Even politico says he does.

[khicks26]

great non-response to facts!

What fact did you post? All you said was BS.

[khicks26]

google it. Even politico says he does.

Not my job to prove your meme.

[khicks26]

and know how to use google and the search engine on craigslist, don't forget.


The fact is they were forced to give out loans to people who didn't deserve them so, of course, they found a way to not get left holding the bag because of some liberal agenda.

Also, most people on wall st did not know the loans were bad or the market collapse wouldn't have been as bad you putz. Trying using your brain to re-read what you type to make sure it makes sense.


You should go watch the big short. It is entertaining and will help you understand what happened in a way that will keep your attention like a youtube video.

So your facts about 2008 come from a movie? LOL

[khicks26]

Maybe I should watch Batman to learn how to fight crime. Your fuking stupid.

[rkelly110]

"The Democratic and Republican Parties are virtual opposites of each other in their economic records, going back to the earliest period for which economic data were available, around 1910. More than a dozen studies have been done comparing economic growth, unemployment, average length of unemployment, stock market performance, inflation, federal debt, and other economic indicators, during Democratic and Republican presidencies and congresses, and they all show stunningly better performance when Democrats are in power, than when Republicans are. These studies are all available online, and they are all summarized and discussed in this path-breaking book, which settles, once and for all, the question of whether there’s any significant economic difference between the two Parties. Not only is there a difference, but – shockingly – it always runs in favor of Democrats in power. There might be other types of reasons for voting Republican, but all of the economic reasons favor voting for Democrats. Regarding economic performance, the two Parties aren’t even close. "

Been saying that for years. Seems we are always in a war or a skirmish during Repub presidencies and afterwards,
recession.

I'm afraid if Trump gets in we are fukked. Our economy is hanging on by a thread, europe isn't in good shape and
our debt and deficit is out of control. If we go into another recession, we don't have the resources to bail anyone out.

[Mr KLC]

[brooks85]

So your facts about 2008 come from a movie? LOL

lol hilarious watching how your logic works. Just so stupid

[brooks85]

"The Democratic and Republican Parties are virtual opposites of each other in their economic records, going back to the earliest period for which economic data were available, around 1910. More than a dozen studies have been done comparing economic growth, unemployment, average length of unemployment, stock market performance, inflation, federal debt, and other economic indicators, during Democratic and Republican presidencies and congresses, and they all show stunningly better performance when Democrats are in power, than when Republicans are. These studies are all available online, and they are all summarized and discussed in this path-breaking book, which settles, once and for all, the question of whether there’s any significant economic difference between the two Parties. Not only is there a difference, but – shockingly – it always runs in favor of Democrats in power. There might be other types of reasons for voting Republican, but all of the economic reasons favor voting for Democrats. Regarding economic performance, the two Parties aren’t even close. "

lol posting old debunked bs. Desperate for them sbr peanuts.

[itchypickle]

Show them to me.

America's Youth PAC

National Nurses United for Patient Protection

Just a couple...and be sure to read up on the difference between the second one listed vs the union "national nurses United" two seperate entities but Sanders has played it off in semantics. He's getting plenty of help from former staffers and friends running them. Don't be fooled man.

[jtoler]

I dont recall Sanders ever saying he was running a self funded campaign. If he did I missed it.

[khicks26]

Fundraising Details

	Campaign Committee	Outside Groups	Combined
Total Raised	$207,664,551	$607,096	$208,271,647
Total Spent	$201,837,030	$679,253	$202,516,283
Cash on Hand	$5,796,719	$-72,157	$5,724,562
Debts	$0	-	-
Date of Report	April 30, 2016	May 16, 2016	-

Source of Funds

	Individual Contributions - Small Individual Contributions - Large Individual Contributions	$206,104,780 $129,495,477 (62%) $79,648,102 (38%)	(99%)
	PAC Contributions	$5,150	(0%)
	Candidate self-financing	$0	(0%)
	Federal Funds	$0	(0%)
	Other	$1,554,622	(1%)

Personal Finances

• Profile
• 2016 Presidential File

Total Spent by All Outside Organizations Targeting Sanders

$5,992,230	$5,132,831	$859,399

View detailed expenditures
Campaign & Single-Candidate Groups Targeting Sanders

Bernie 2016	Pro-Sanders	Campaign	$207,664,551
Progressive Kick	Pro-Sanders	SuperPAC	$308,417
Feel Bern	Pro-Sanders	SuperPAC	$261,214
Progressive Voters of America	Pro-Sanders	Leadership PAC	$23,421
Collective Actions PAC	Pro-Sanders	SuperPAC	$8,795
Las Cruces for Bernie	Pro-Sanders	SuperPAC	$5,248
BillionairesForBernie.org	Pro-Sanders	SuperPAC	$0

NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 2016 election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on Monday, May 23, 2016.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000528

No way that adds up to 4.4 mil.

Trump is not self funding either.

[khicks26]

Candidate Summary, 2016 Cycle

BUSINESSMAN

DECLARED CANDIDACYTrump, born in 1946, is a billionaire real estate developer, businessman and television personality. After decades of persistent flirtation with the idea of seeking a White House bid, Trump announced on June 16, 2015, that he would officially seek the GOP nomination. Having never previously held office, Trump will likely tout his success in business as the focal point of his presidential platform. But he is no stranger to Washington. Trump has been a frequent donor to both Democratic and Republican federal political candidates, spending tens of thousands of dollars supporting them and causing some to question his sincerity as a GOP candidate. He also sparked controversy by questioning whether President Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen, asking for his birth certificate and passport history. Candidacy declared: June 16, 2015
Show More Information About Donald Trump
Fundraising Totals





HC4DTDonald J Trump for President*Committee to Restore America's GreatnessPatriots for TrumpMake America GreatTrumpet! PACAmericans for GreatnessLet's Trump PoliticsTrumPACMake America Great AgainCrippled AmericaTrump USA Super PACMake America Great Again PACAmerican National Trump SuperPACAmerica's Trump Card SuperPACTrumPAC$0$12M$24M$36M$48M$60MRai sed
Spent

* campaign committee
Fundraising Details

	Campaign Committee	Outside Groups	Combined
Total Raised	$57,661,991	$3,294,868	$60,956,859
Total Spent	$55,253,349	$2,963,523	$58,216,872
Cash on Hand	$2,408,642	$331,345	$2,739,987
Debts	$43,454,544	-	-
Date of Report	April 30, 2016	May 16, 2016	-

Source of Funds

	Individual Contributions - Small Individual Contributions - Large Individual Contributions	$13,857,206 $10,514,404 (18%) $3,446,622 (6%)	(24%)
	PAC Contributions	$0	(0%)
	Candidate self-financing	$43,454,544	(75%)
	Federal Funds	$0	(0%)
	Other	$350,241	(1%)

Personal Finances

• Profile
• 2016 Presidential File

Total Spent by All Outside Organizations Targeting Trump

$54,147,604	$13,038,863	$40,782,191

View detailed expenditures
Campaign & Single-Candidate Groups Targeting Trump

Donald J Trump for President	Pro-Trump	Campaign	$57,661,991
Our Principles PAC	Anti-Trump	SuperPAC	$18,880,381
Make America Great Again PAC	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$1,742,684
TrumPAC	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$1,066,588
Committee to Restore America's Greatness	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$341,008
NeverTrump PAC	Anti-Trump	SuperPAC	$305,858
Patriots for Trump	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$131,623
American National Trump SuperPAC	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$12,966
Make America Great Again	Pro-Trump	501c4	$0
Crippled America	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
TuckFrump.com	Anti-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
Dump Terrifying Rhetoric Undermine Mainstream Poli	Anti-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
Trump USA Super PAC	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
America's Trump Card SuperPAC	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
TrumPAC	Pro-Trump	501c4	$0
HC4DT	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
Make America Great	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
Trumpet! PAC	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
Americans for Greatness	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0
Let's Trump Politics	Pro-Trump	SuperPAC	$0

NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 2016 election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on Monday, May 23, 2016.

Surly not 98% self funding. But surly will not pay a dime in tax's

[Optional]

Didn't realize Trump was 70 this year. Thought he was closer to 60.