Is betting shit you know nothing about better or worse or the same as normal plays

[topgame85]

I am 2-0 in wc qualifying today and know shit about soccer, I had a good run in wnba and olympic ball over summer, have had bad stretches in BKB, and Foots which i follow closely what gives?

[onthewhat]

its all 50% in the long run

i did well in WNBA when i bet but small sample size

[topgame85]

I agree onner sometimes you over analyze shit, I basically flipped a coin on these two futbol games and won both but am getting hammered in MLB today which is my main stay unreal

[pavyracer]

In soccer you have to be 75% winner to win money since there is huge chalk especially in WC qualifiers.

[sallysnax8]

all the same....whats the worse that could happen? you lose? we've all done that

[onthewhat]

meant 50% on sides paver

[topgame85]

i bet o/u paver one was -146 othe was +114 don't eat big chalk

[pavyracer]

Every weekend out of 100 soccer games 75 are heavy chalk on sides. Overs are a different animal but unless you play at pinny you get raped at bookmaker or betjam with 20-30c juice.

Just because you won today doesn't mean is easy every time. I have seen -170 over 2.5 games end 0-0 many times.

[RogueJuror]

In soccer you have to be 75% winner to win money since there is huge chalk especially in WC qualifiers.

lol, sharp alright

[topgame85]

i'm sure there are Pavy just saying i got lucky today betting something I knew nothing about really 1 of 2 at + money and sometime I bet on something i know about that seems solid at - money and get raped so what really is the difference