Originally <a href='http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/showthread.php?p=23888311'>posted</a> on 04/18/2015:
What would've made the most sense was using a 'cashes' tiebreaker to determine who gets the spots near 50, and then using 1st place finishes if that wasn't enough. Which would eliminate me, I understand that, but that would've been the best way.
BUT.... you said everyone tied would play sudden death. Now that's not the case anymore by allowing the 2 with the most cashes to not have to participate. This is actually very unfair to horja.
Now if you want to change it yet again and give 50th to horja b/c of cashes; I'm actually ok with that. It's my fault for not playing in these tournaments in the beginning months. But next time you run a tournament, get all your ducks in a row before it starts.
What would've made the most sense was using a 'cashes' tiebreaker to determine who gets the spots near 50, and then using 1st place finishes if that wasn't enough. Which would eliminate me, I understand that, but that would've been the best way.
BUT.... you said everyone tied would play sudden death. Now that's not the case anymore by allowing the 2 with the most cashes to not have to participate. This is actually very unfair to horja.
Now if you want to change it yet again and give 50th to horja b/c of cashes; I'm actually ok with that. It's my fault for not playing in these tournaments in the beginning months. But next time you run a tournament, get all your ducks in a row before it starts.