Originally posted on 03/12/2015:

Hey guys... most all of the folding with < 2BB, trying to squeak into $, folding w/2:1 on shorty, etc.... can, in fact, be legitimately explained by bad play (as daner states) or some form of strategy. That's just poker, as we know, and what sometimes can be misinterpreted as soft playing is NOT... and as Sharpy alludes to, there's sometimes a murky gray area in there, too, which is all but unprovable (and usually not soft playing when all is said and done).

That's not what I'm talking about here, however. I'm talking about PROVABLE, 100% soft playing backed up by evidence: HH and accompanying chat log confirming as such.

You guys are correct: I owe it to the community to lay out the evidence... so, I will do so later tonight (forgive me as I'm busy doing various things and can't get to it till later tonight/early morning).

But... STAY TUNED!