Originally on 02/25/2015:
Finally, someone gets it. I asked them to give me proof of being up 2000; I r my question wrong or they were to technical. There are all kind of scenarios to get to 2000 on a 6 game streak shills. What they failed to include was the cost of product and any loses prior. So while the record looks fancy, their numbers are forgetting all the -50 since they have only one 6 game streak win. So not only do they have to sustain that win % they need 6 game winning streaks. What is not to get people? Cause they can win 6 in a row and have a record of 6-a million or they can be hitting 70% winners but not one 6 game streak causing everyone to lose. HELLO? Yet, there are clowns on here defending them like they got them out of the poor house.
Originally posted by ridetheriver
Finally, someone gets it. I asked them to give me proof of being up 2000; I r my question wrong or they were to technical. There are all kind of scenarios to get to 2000 on a 6 game streak shills. What they failed to include was the cost of product and any loses prior. So while the record looks fancy, their numbers are forgetting all the -50 since they have only one 6 game streak win. So not only do they have to sustain that win % they need 6 game winning streaks. What is not to get people? Cause they can win 6 in a row and have a record of 6-a million or they can be hitting 70% winners but not one 6 game streak causing everyone to lose. HELLO? Yet, there are clowns on here defending them like they got them out of the poor house.