Originally posted on 12/22/2011:
I love how you point out how his 3* plays are optional but completely ignore to comment on the 10.4 unit loss. The poster above clearly explains they are not used for his record keeping, but he's not a douche about it. Explain to me this: If you wager 10.4 Units to win 5 units like John did on the DAL game, how is that considered a 5* play? He lost and only counts it as a 5* loss, and therefore if you tailed perfectly you would not be near to where John says he is. I don't care if anyone believes me or not, it doesn't take much common sense to figure that out. I actually like a lot of his plays, I just dislike being deliberately mislead. Best thing to do here is prolly tail if you are leaning that way already, but don't tail because his inaccurate record appears "good."
I love how you point out how his 3* plays are optional but completely ignore to comment on the 10.4 unit loss. The poster above clearly explains they are not used for his record keeping, but he's not a douche about it. Explain to me this: If you wager 10.4 Units to win 5 units like John did on the DAL game, how is that considered a 5* play? He lost and only counts it as a 5* loss, and therefore if you tailed perfectly you would not be near to where John says he is. I don't care if anyone believes me or not, it doesn't take much common sense to figure that out. I actually like a lot of his plays, I just dislike being deliberately mislead. Best thing to do here is prolly tail if you are leaning that way already, but don't tail because his inaccurate record appears "good."