shari does not understand the legal system. it's people like her on juries that cause innocent people to be put in jail and worst put to death. innocence is in no way important to a trial. the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove she is guilty, if they can not she should be found not guilty regardless of if you think she did it or not. the defense does not have to produce any evidence she is innocent and they do not have to call witnesses.

there is no such thing as the evidence is better than that she didn't do it. there is no legal burden of that in the criminal systems. you should not speak on things you no nothing about. you are the kind of person destroying the justice system.

also the lack of DNA evidence is the only evidence needed. there is no interpenetration of reasoning. it is concert evidence. it would have been impossible for her to commit the crime and there not be DNA.